| Literature DB >> 34016993 |
Linda T Vahdat1, Peter Schmid2, Andres Forero-Torres3, Kimberly Blackwell4, Melinda L Telli5, Michelle Melisko6, Volker Möbus7, Javier Cortes8, Alberto J Montero9, Cynthia Ma10, Rita Nanda11, Gail S Wright12, Yi He13,14, Thomas Hawthorne13, Rebecca G Bagley13,15, Abdel-Baset Halim13,16, Christopher D Turner13,17, Denise A Yardley18.
Abstract
The METRIC study (NCT#0199733) explored a novel antibody-drug conjugate, glembatumumab vedotin (GV), targeting gpNMB that is overexpressed in ~40% of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and associated with poor prognosis. The study was a randomized, open-label, phase 2b study that evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) of GV compared with capecitabine in gpNMB-overexpressing TNBC. Patients who had previously received anthracycline and taxane-based therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive, GV (1.88 mg/kg IV q21 days) or capecitabine (2500 mg/m2 PO daily d1-14 q21 days). The primary endpoint was RECIST 1.1 PFS per independent, blinded central review. In all, 327 patients were randomized to GV (213 treated) or capecitabine (92 treated). Median PFS was 2.9 months for GV vs. 2.8 months for capecitabine. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities for GV were neutropenia, rash, and leukopenia, and for capecitabine were fatigue, diarrhea, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS over capecitabine or demonstrate a relative risk/benefit improvement over capecitabine.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34016993 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00244-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer ISSN: 2374-4677