| Literature DB >> 34014437 |
Domenico Albano1, Mark Tulchinsky2, Francesco Dondi3, Angelica Mazzoletti3, Francesco Bertagna3, Raffaele Giubbini3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of thyroglobulin (Tg) kinetics in predicting 2-[18F]-FDG-PET/CT results and overall survival (OS) in patients affected by differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and suspected recurrence.Entities:
Keywords: 2-[18F]-FDG PET/CT; Differentiated thyroid carcinoma; Thyroglobulin doubling time; Thyroglobulin kinetics; Thyroglobulin velocity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34014437 PMCID: PMC8497300 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-021-02755-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocrine ISSN: 1355-008X Impact factor: 3.633
Baseline features of our population
| Average (range) | Patients | |
|---|---|---|
| Age years | 55.5 (20–82) | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 75 (54%) | |
| Female | 64 (46%) | |
| Histotype | ||
| Papillary | 50 (36%) | |
| Follicular variant of papillary | 21 (15%) | |
| Follicular | 32 (23%) | |
| Aggressive variant | 22 (16%) | |
| Hurtle cell | 13 (9%) | |
| Unknown (Tx) | 1 (1%) | |
| Tumor size (mm) | 33 (6–90) | |
| Multicentricity | 33 (24%) | |
| Thyroiditis | 10 (7%) | |
| T-stage | ||
| sTx | 1 (1%) | |
| sT1 | 26 (19%) | |
| sT2 | 31 (22%) | |
| sT3 | 65 (47%) | |
| sT4 | 16 (11%) | |
| N-stage | ||
| sN0 | 84 (60%) | |
| sN1a | 29 (21%) | |
| sN1b | 26 (19%) | |
| M-stage | ||
| sM1 | 13 (9%) | |
| ATA class risk | ||
| Low | 29 (21%) | |
| Intermediate | 81 (58%) | |
| High | 29 (21%) | |
| Tg at the time of ablation (ng/mL) | 165 (0.1–600) | |
| TgAb positive at ablation | 21 (15%) | |
| First RAI activities administrated (GBq) | 3.3 (1–5.5) | |
| Cumulative RAI activities administrated (GBq) | 31.9 (3.7–96.6) | |
| N° therapies | 4.6 (1–10) | |
n number, GBq Gigabequerel, RAI radioiodine, var variant, Tg thyroglobulin, Ab antibodies
Fig. 1ROC curve analyses for the evaluation of the relationship between Tg in ng/mL (A), TgDT (B), and Tg-vel (C) thresholds for identifying positive PET/CT results. Comparison of ROC curves (D)
Cutoff values calculated using ROC curve analysis considering the entire population
| ROC curve analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | AUC (95% CI) | Cut-off value | Youden Index | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
| Tg ng/mL | 0.848 (0.778–0.903) | <0.001 | 18 | 0.605 | 73% | 87.5% |
| TgDT y | 0.788 (0.185–0.926) | <0.001 | 1.36 | 0.535 | 66% | 87.5% |
| Tg-vel ng/mL/y | 0.790 (0.713–0.854) | <0.001 | 1.95 | 0.532 | 78% | 75% |
Fig. 2The relationship between PET/CT results and TgDT (A) and Tg-vel (B)
Fig. 3Overall survival curves according to ATA class risk (A), PET results (B), Tg before PET (C), and TgDT (D)
univariate and multivariate analyses for OS
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Gender | 0.968 | 0.987 (0.540–1.806) | ||
| Age | 0.468 | 1.260 (0.673–2.358) | ||
| Histotype | 0.666 | 0.784 (0.239–2.494) | ||
| Tumor size | 0.885 | 1.084 (0.353–3.336) | ||
| Multicentricity | 0.997 | 1.002 (0.271–3.701) | ||
| ATA class risk | <0.001 | 6.022 (2.335–15.530) | <0.001 | 3.233 (1.988–5.256) |
| Cumulative RAI activities administrated (GBq) | 0.268 | 0.220 (0.069–1.903) | ||
| N° radiometabolic therapies | 0.272 | 1.897 (0.615–5.609) | ||
| Tg at the time of ablation | 0.164 | 0.090 (0.058–1.620) | ||
| Presence of bone metastasis at ablation | 0.099 | 0.150 (0.030–2.222) | ||
| Positive PET/CT | 0.018 | 0.422 (0.186–0.956) | 0.036 | 1.803 (1.111–2.567) |
| Tg before PET/CTa | 0.029 | 0.502 (0.272–0.935) | 0.014 | 2.883 (1.236–6.722) |
| Tg-vela | 0.750 | 0.891 (0.437–1.861) | ||
| TgDTa | 0.048 | 0.583 (0.318–0.998) | 0.055 | 0.501 (0.247–1.015) |
| Interval from diagnosis to PET/CT (years) | 0.820 | 1.003 (0.972–1.035) | ||
| Presence of bone metastases before PET/CT | <0.001 | 1.252 (1.111–1.500) | 0.002 | 2.001 (1.250–3.108) |
OS overall survival, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, N° number
aVariables dichotomized using cutoff values after ROC analysis reported in Table 2