Literature DB >> 34014329

Prevalence of Immunosuppressive Drug Use Among Commercially Insured US Adults, 2018-2019.

Beth I Wallace1,2, Brooke Kenney3, Preeti N Malani1, Daniel J Clauw4, Brahmajee K Nallamothu1, Akbar K Waljee1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34014329      PMCID: PMC8138687          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

The use of immunosuppressive drugs is a potential risk factor for infectious disease, including COVID-19 illness.[1] For instance, although dexamethasone improves survival among patients with severe COVID-19 infections,[2] long-term glucocorticoid use may increase the risk of hospitalization among patients who contract COVID-19.[3] A prior study relying on patient self-report estimated that 2.7% of US adults were immunosuppressed in 2013, but the study did not explore features associated with use of immunosuppressive medications.[4] In this cross-sectional study, we used direct pharmaceutical claims to describe the contemporary prevalence of drug-induced immunosuppression in a large cohort of US adults.

Methods

Deidentified data from Clinformatics Data Mart (Optum, Inc), a national commercial claims database, were used in this cross-sectional study. Adults aged 18 through 64 years who had continuous commercial medical insurance coverage from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2019, were included. We used 2017 data to establish baseline comorbid conditions; 2018 and 2019 data were used to determine drug-induced immunosuppression. We defined drug-induced immunosuppression as use of any of the following regimens in a 365-day period: (1) 1 dose or more of an antineoplastic immunosuppressive drug; (2) 30 days or more of oral glucocorticoids; (3) 90 days of any other oral or subcutaneous immunosuppressive drug; or (4) 2 doses of intravenous, noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive drugs. We excluded single-dose intravenous corticosteroids, which are often used as premedication for infusions. We classified immunosuppressive drugs into 6 categories as follows: oral corticosteroids, methotrexate, other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and transplant antirejection medications, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, antineoplastic agents, and other biological product medications and Janus kinase inhibitors (eTable 1 in the Supplement). We used Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) to group International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes for common medical conditions associated with drug-induced immunosuppression and common primary diagnoses (eTable 2 in the Supplement). This study was granted exempt status, including a waiver of informed patient consent for use of deidentified secondary data, by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies.

Results

Of the 3 169 441 continuously enrolled patients, 89 925 (2.8%) met the criteria for drug-induced immunosuppression during the period January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019. Table 1 shows baseline patient characteristics. Most recipients of immunosuppressive drugs were older (median age, 53 years; interquartile range, 50-59 years), and women (55 043 [61.2%]).The most commonly prescribed immunosuppressive drugs were prednisone (47 649 patients [53.0%]), methotrexate (22 013 [24.5%]), and methylprednisolone (19 405 [21.6%]), which together were used by 62.5% of patients (Table 2). Oral corticosteroids were received by 67.7% of patients, and 40.9% received oral corticosteroids for 30 days or longer in a 365-day period. The 3 most common immunosuppression-associated diagnosis categories were malignant neoplasms (73.8%), immune-mediated conditions (68.8%), and inflammatory skin conditions (38.8%). After excluding 1 primary diagnosis category that was too general to provide useful diagnostic classification (FAC014, “medical examination/evaluation”), the 3 most common primary diagnosis categories were “neoplasm-related encounters” (51.8%), “exposure, encounters, screening, or contact with infectious disease” (50.6%), and “musculoskeletal findings, not low back pain” (48.3%).
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients Experiencing Drug-Induced Immunosuppression, 2018-2019

CharacteristicNo. (%) (N = 89 925)
Age, y
18-3510 350 (11.5)
36-4514 478 (16.1)
46-5527 516 (30.6)
56-6437 581 (41.8)
Men34 882 (38.8)
Women55 043 (61.2)
Elixhauser comorbidity index score, median (interquartile range)a2 (1-4)
Highest level of education
<High school370 (0.4)
High school22 643 (25.2)
<Bachelor’s degree46 398 (51.6)
≥Bachelor’s degree16 555 (18.4)
Unknown3959 (4.4)
US Census region
Midwest22 137 (24.6)
Northeast8177 (9.1)
South41 808 (46.5)
West17 635 (19.6)
Unreported168 (0.2)

The Elixhauser comorbidity index assesses 30 comorbidity groups as present or absent, generating a numeric score that can be used for population risk adjustment. A score of 2 means 2 of the 30 assessed comorbidity groups are present.

Table 2.

Most Commonly Prescribed Immunosuppressive Medications and Medical Diagnoses Among Patients Experiencing Drug-Induced Immunosuppression, 2018-2019

Medications and diagnosesNo. (%) (N = 89 925)a
Drug class
1. Oral corticosteroidsb60 860 (67.7)
2. Methotrexate22 013 (24.5)
3. Nonbiological DMARDs and transplant antirejection medications23 315 (25.9)
4. TNF inhibitors20 434 (22.7)
5. Other biological product medicationsc12 276 (13.7)
6. Antineoplastic medications16 191 (18.0)
Most common immunosuppression-associated diagnoses
1. Malignant neoplasm66 385 (73.8)
2. Immune-mediated conditions61 822 (68.8)
3. Inflammatory skin conditions34 895 (38.8)
4. Asthma or COPD24 205 (26.9)
5. Organ transplantd7105 (7.9)
Most common primary diagnoses
1. Neoplasm-related encounters46 624 (51.8)
2. Exposure, encounters, screening, or contact with infectious disease45 489 (50.6)
3. Musculoskeletal pain, not low back pain43 457 (48.3)
4. Respiratory signs and symptoms33 019 (36.7)
5. Abdominal pain and other digestive/abdomen signs and symptoms31 509 (35.0)

Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

The total number of prescriptions for the study period was 1 455 458.

This group of drugs includes oral formulations of prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, cortisone, and hydrocortisone.

This class includes Janus kinase inhibitors.

This diagnosis group includes solid organ, skin, cornea, bone, bone marrow, and stem cell transplant.

The Elixhauser comorbidity index assesses 30 comorbidity groups as present or absent, generating a numeric score that can be used for population risk adjustment. A score of 2 means 2 of the 30 assessed comorbidity groups are present. Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. The total number of prescriptions for the study period was 1 455 458. This group of drugs includes oral formulations of prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, cortisone, and hydrocortisone. This class includes Janus kinase inhibitors. This diagnosis group includes solid organ, skin, cornea, bone, bone marrow, and stem cell transplant.

Discussion

In a national cohort of insured adults, more than 80 000 patients (2.8%) experienced drug-induced immunosuppression during the study period. Approximately two-thirds of patients (67.7%) received oral corticosteroids, and nearly half (40.9%) used oral corticosteroids for 30 days or longer. Common primary diagnoses in the study population included conditions often associated with corticosteroid use (eg, infections) and conditions for which corticosteroids are often prescribed despite limited evidence of benefit (eg, musculoskeletal pain, respiratory ailments).[5] Limitations of this study include the uncertainty regarding the exact drugs prescribed for a given condition, dual indications for certain drugs (eg, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide), incomplete capture of inpatient medications, imperfect generalizability of commercial claims data, lack of corticosteroid dose information, and lack of modeling to demonstrate associations. These findings are noteworthy given evolving evidence that long-term glucocorticoid use may increase the risk of COVID-19–related hospitalization.[3] Steroid-sparing immunosuppressants may present an alternative to long-term corticosteroid use, but limited data exist regarding how these treatments affect the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19.[3] While the possibility of an association is being clarified, clinicians should adhere to principles of corticosteroid stewardship by avoiding unnecessary corticosteroid prescribing when possible; carefully discussing the risks, benefits, and available treatment alternatives with patients; using the lowest drug dose and shortest duration appropriate for the condition; and advocating for public health measures.[6]
  5 in total

1.  Burst Case Scenario: Why Shorter May Not Be Any Better When It Comes to Corticosteroids.

Authors:  Beth I Wallace; Akbar K Waljee
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Prevalence of Immunosuppression Among US Adults, 2013.

Authors:  Rafael Harpaz; Rebecca M Dahl; Kathleen L Dooling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Effect of Dexamethasone on Days Alive and Ventilator-Free in Patients With Moderate or Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19: The CoDEX Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bruno M Tomazini; Israel S Maia; Alexandre B Cavalcanti; Otavio Berwanger; Regis G Rosa; Viviane C Veiga; Alvaro Avezum; Renato D Lopes; Flavia R Bueno; Maria Vitoria A O Silva; Franca P Baldassare; Eduardo L V Costa; Ricardo A B Moura; Michele O Honorato; Andre N Costa; Lucas P Damiani; Thiago Lisboa; Letícia Kawano-Dourado; Fernando G Zampieri; Guilherme B Olivato; Cassia Righy; Cristina P Amendola; Roberta M L Roepke; Daniela H M Freitas; Daniel N Forte; Flávio G R Freitas; Caio C F Fernandes; Livia M G Melro; Gedealvares F S Junior; Douglas Costa Morais; Stevin Zung; Flávia R Machado; Luciano C P Azevedo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Short term use of oral corticosteroids and related harms among adults in the United States: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Akbar K Waljee; Mary A M Rogers; Paul Lin; Amit G Singal; Joshua D Stein; Rory M Marks; John Z Ayanian; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-04-12

5.  Characteristics associated with hospitalisation for COVID-19 in people with rheumatic disease: data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry.

Authors:  Milena Gianfrancesco; Kimme L Hyrich; Jinoos Yazdany; Pedro M Machado; Philip C Robinson; Sarah Al-Adely; Loreto Carmona; Maria I Danila; Laure Gossec; Zara Izadi; Lindsay Jacobsohn; Patricia Katz; Saskia Lawson-Tovey; Elsa F Mateus; Stephanie Rush; Gabriela Schmajuk; Julia Simard; Anja Strangfeld; Laura Trupin; Katherine D Wysham; Suleman Bhana; Wendy Costello; Rebecca Grainger; Jonathan S Hausmann; Jean W Liew; Emily Sirotich; Paul Sufka; Zachary S Wallace
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 19.103

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Pancreatic Stone Protein as a Biomarker for Sepsis at the Emergency Department of a Large Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Titus A P de Hond; Jan Jelrik Oosterheert; Susan J M van Hemert-Glaubitz; Ruben E A Musson; Karin A H Kaasjager
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Small Molecule Signatures of Mice Lacking T-cell p38 Alternate Activation, a Model for Immunosuppression Conditions, after Total-Body Irradiation.

Authors:  Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Jerry Angdisen; Meth M Jayatilake; Pelagie Ake; Lorreta Yun-Tien Lin; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 3.  When to Start and Stop Bone-Protecting Medication for Preventing Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kaleen N Hayes; Ulrike Baschant; Barbara Hauser; Andrea M Burden; Elizabeth M Winter
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Modulation of immunosuppressant drug treatment to improve SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy in mice.

Authors:  Amy V Paschall; Ahmet Ozdilek; Sydney L Briner; Melinda A Brindley; Fikri Y Avci
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  The Role of the Oral Immune System in Oropharyngeal Candidiasis-Facilitated Invasion and Dissemination of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Raymond Pasman; Bastiaan P Krom; Sebastian A J Zaat; Stanley Brul
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-07

6.  Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees.

Authors:  James J Tsakas; David F L Liew; Cameron L Adams; Catherine L Hill; Susanna Proudman; Samuel Whittle; Rachelle Buchbinder; Philip C Robinson
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2022-10-17

Review 7.  Cardiovascular effects of immunosuppression agents.

Authors:  Aly Elezaby; Ryan Dexheimer; Karim Sallam
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-21

Review 8.  Lactobacilli Infection Case Reports in the Last Three Years and Safety Implications.

Authors:  Franca Rossi; Carmela Amadoro; Maurizio Gasperi; Giampaolo Colavita
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.