Literature DB >> 34013347

Predicting circadian phase across populations: a comparison of mathematical models and wearable devices.

Yitong Huang1, Caleb Mayer2, Philip Cheng3, Alankrita Siddula4, Helen J Burgess5, Christopher Drake3, Cathy Goldstein6, Olivia Walch6, Daniel B Forger2,7,8.   

Abstract

From smart work scheduling to optimal drug timing, there is enormous potential in translating circadian rhythms research results for precision medicine in the real world. However, the pursuit of such effort requires the ability to accurately estimate circadian phase outside of the laboratory. One approach is to predict circadian phase noninvasively using light and activity measurements and mathematical models of the human circadian clock. Most mathematical models take light as an input and predict the effect of light on the human circadian system. However, consumer-grade wearables that are already owned by millions of individuals record activity instead of light, which prompts an evaluation of the accuracy of predicting circadian phase using motion alone. Here, we evaluate the ability of four different models of the human circadian clock to estimate circadian phase from data acquired by wrist-worn wearable devices. Multiple datasets across populations with varying degrees of circadian disruption were used for generalizability. Though the models we test yield similar predictions, analysis of data from 27 shift workers with high levels of circadian disruption shows that activity, which is recorded in almost every wearable device, is better at predicting circadian phase than measured light levels from wrist-worn devices when processed by mathematical models. In those living under normal living conditions, circadian phase can typically be predicted to within 1 h, even with data from a widely available commercial device (the Apple Watch). These results show that circadian phase can be predicted using existing data passively collected by millions of individuals with comparable accuracy to much more invasive and expensive methods. © Sleep Research Society 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actigraphy; circadian rhythms; mathematical models; wearable data

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34013347      PMCID: PMC8503830          DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsab126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   6.313


  46 in total

1.  Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells.

Authors:  Emi Nagoshi; Camille Saini; Christoph Bauer; Thierry Laroche; Felix Naef; Ueli Schibler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Macroscopic Models for Human Circadian Rhythms.

Authors:  Kevin M Hannay; Victoria Booth; Daniel B Forger
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.182

Review 3.  Locomotor activity and non-photic influences on circadian clocks.

Authors:  N Mrosovsky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1996-08

4.  Bright light induction of strong (type 0) resetting of the human circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  C A Czeisler; R E Kronauer; J S Allan; J F Duffy; M E Jewett; E N Brown; J M Ronda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Disruption of circadian rhythms accelerates development of diabetes through pancreatic beta-cell loss and dysfunction.

Authors:  John E Gale; Heather I Cox; Jingyi Qian; Gene D Block; Christopher S Colwell; Aleksey V Matveyenko
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.182

6.  Fragmentation and stability of circadian activity rhythms predict mortality: the Rotterdam study.

Authors:  Lisette A Zuurbier; Annemarie I Luik; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; Eus J W Van Someren; Henning Tiemeier
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Irregular sleep/wake patterns are associated with poorer academic performance and delayed circadian and sleep/wake timing.

Authors:  Andrew J K Phillips; William M Clerx; Conor S O'Brien; Akane Sano; Laura K Barger; Rosalind W Picard; Steven W Lockley; Elizabeth B Klerman; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Daily Light Exposure Patterns Reveal Phase and Period of the Human Circadian Clock.

Authors:  Tom Woelders; Domien G M Beersma; Marijke C M Gordijn; Roelof A Hut; Emma J Wams
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.182

9.  Human circadian phase-response curves for exercise.

Authors:  Shawn D Youngstedt; Jeffrey A Elliott; Daniel F Kripke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  High sensitivity and interindividual variability in the response of the human circadian system to evening light.

Authors:  Andrew J K Phillips; Parisa Vidafar; Angus C Burns; Elise M McGlashan; Clare Anderson; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Steven W Lockley; Sean W Cain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Initial proof of concept that a consumer wearable can be used for real-time rest-activity rhythm monitoring.

Authors:  Stephen F Smagula; Sarah T Stahl; Robert T Krafty; Daniel J Buysse
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  A method for characterizing daily physiology from widely used wearables.

Authors:  Clark Bowman; Yitong Huang; Olivia J Walch; Yu Fang; Elena Frank; Jonathan Tyler; Caleb Mayer; Christopher Stockbridge; Cathy Goldstein; Srijan Sen; Daniel B Forger
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2021-07-29

3.  Estimating circadian phase in elementary school children: leveraging advances in physiologically informed models of circadian entrainment and wearable devices.

Authors:  Jennette P Moreno; Kevin M Hannay; Olivia Walch; Hafza Dadabhoy; Jessica Christian; Maurice Puyau; Abeer El-Mubasher; Fida Bacha; Sarah R Grant; Rebekah Julie Park; Philip Cheng
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 4.  Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in sleep medicine: a sleep clinician's perspective.

Authors:  Anuja Bandyopadhyay; Cathy Goldstein
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Automated analysis of activity, sleep, and rhythmic behaviour in various animal species with the Rtivity software.

Authors:  Rui F O Silva; Brígida R Pinho; Nuno M Monteiro; Miguel M Santos; Jorge M A Oliveira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The circadian stimulus-oscillator model: Improvements to Kronauer's model of the human circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  Mark S Rea; Rohan Nagare; Andrew Bierman; Mariana G Figueiro
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 7.  Holistic Needs Assessment of Cancer Survivors-Supporting the Process Through Digital Monitoring of Circadian Physiology.

Authors:  Max Gibb; Hannah Winter; Sandra Komarzynski; Nicholas I Wreglesworth; Pasquale F Innominato
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.077

8.  The Promise of Sleep: A Multi-Sensor Approach for Accurate Sleep Stage Detection Using the Oura Ring.

Authors:  Marco Altini; Hannu Kinnunen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.