| Literature DB >> 34012699 |
Fernanda Cristina Stenger Moura1, Carmem Lúcia Dos Santos Machado2, Favero Reisdorfer Paula2, Angélica Garcia Couto1, Maurizio Ricci3, Valdir Cechinel-Filho1, Tiago J Bonomini1, Louis P Sandjo4, Tania Mari Bellé Bresolin1.
Abstract
Taxifolin has a plethora of therapeutic activities and is currently isolated from the stem bark of the tree Larix gmelinni (Dahurian larch). It is a flavonoid of high commercial interest for its use in supplements or in antioxidant-rich functional foods. However, its poor stability and low bioavailability hinder the use of flavonoid in nutritional or pharmaceutical formulations. In this work, taxifolin isolated from the seeds of Mimusops balata, was evaluated by in silico stability prediction studies and in vitro forced degradation studies (acid and alkaline hydrolysis, oxidation, visible/UV radiation, dry/humid heating) monitored by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) and ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS). The in silico stability prediction studies indicated the most susceptible regions in the molecule to nucleophilic and electrophilic attacks, as well as the sites susceptible to oxidation. The in vitro forced degradation tests were in agreement with the in silico stability prediction, indicating that taxifolin is extremely unstable (class 1) under alkaline hydrolysis. In addition, taxifolin thermal degradation was increased by humidity. On the other hand, with respect to photosensitivity, taxifolin can be classified as class 4 (stable). Moreover, the alkaline degradation products were characterized by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS as dimers of taxifolin. These results enabled an understanding of the intrinsic lability of taxifolin, contributing to the development of stability-indicating methods, and of appropriate drug release systems, with the aims of preserving its stability and improving its bioavailability.Entities:
Keywords: Dihydroquercetin; Forced degradation; In silico stability prediction
Year: 2020 PMID: 34012699 PMCID: PMC8116214 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.06.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Anal ISSN: 2214-0883
Fig. 1Chemical structure of taxifolin (A); 3D visualization in tube (B); Molecular electronic potential (MEP) (C), beyond the van der Waals isosurface 0.002 eV using Spartan for Windows 08. Color scheme: blue positive to red negative electrostatic potentials values (-40.000–75.000 kcal/mol).
Values of the neutral, positive and negative populational analysis (NPA), electrophilic f− and nucleophilic f+ condensed Fukui functions and Δf of the atoms of the taxifolin molecule calculated with the DFT/B3LYP and the 6.311G∗ (d,f) basis set considering Eqs. (1), (2), (3).
| Atoms | NPA | NPA+ | NPA- | Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O1 | 8.52946 | 8.49859 | 8.55921 | -0.03087 | -0.02975 | -0.00112 |
| C2 | 5.92398 | 5.93919 | 5.92735 | 0.015207 | -0.00337 | 0.01858 |
| C3 | 5.97847 | 5.97604 | 5.96088 | -0.00243 | 0.01759 | -0.02002 |
| C4 | 5.47298 | 5.47368 | 5.67386 | 0.000698 | -0.20088 | 0.20158 |
| C4a | 6.32195 | 6.32146 | 6.29739 | -0.00048 | 0.02456 | -0.02505 |
| C5 | 5.57605 | 5.56164 | 5.64018 | -0.01440 | -0.06414 | 0.04973 |
| C6 | 6.37703 | 6.28324 | 6.39284 | -0.09378 | -0.01582 | -0.07797 |
| C7 | 5.61044 | 5.61768 | 5.71376 | 0.007233 | -0.10332 | 0.11055 |
| C8 | 5.59928 | 5.58731 | 5.68196 | -0.01198 | -0.08268 | 0.07071 |
| C8a | 6.40131 | 6.34162 | 6.40806 | -0.05968 | -0.00675 | -0.05294 |
| O9 | 8.75674 | 8.75092 | 8.78593 | -0.00582 | -0.02919 | 0.02337 |
| O10 | 8.62877 | 8.59317 | 8.75514 | -0.03559 | -0.12637 | 0.09077 |
| O11 | 8.68331 | 8.62974 | 8.73394 | -0.05357 | -0.05064 | -0.00293 |
| O12 | 8.67417 | 8.65064 | 8.71821 | -0.02353 | -0.04404 | 0.02051 |
| C1′ | 6.08394 | 5.99073 | 6.05584 | -0.09321 | 0.02801 | -0.12130 |
| C2′ | 6.29342 | 6.29690 | 6.30145 | 0.00348 | -0.00804 | 0.01152 |
| C3′ | 5.73766 | 5.67456 | 5.74815 | -0.06309 | -0.01050 | -0.05259 |
| C4′ | 5.70828 | 5.64012 | 5.73460 | -0.06816 | -0.02632 | -0.04184 |
| C5′ | 6.27564 | 6.25328 | 6.29178 | -0.02236 | -0.01614 | -0.00623 |
| C6′ | 6.22217 | 6.17170 | 6.22733 | -0.05047 | -0.00516 | -0.04531 |
| O7′ | 8.72534 | 8.66951 | 8.73926 | -0.05583 | -0.01391 | -0.04192 |
| O8′ | 8.69390 | 8.60099 | 8.71253 | -0.09291 | -0.01863 | -0.07428 |
Fukui function values for radical attack and bond dissociation energies of taxifolin hydrogen.
| Hydrogen atoms | ||
|---|---|---|
| H–C2 | -0.02141 | |
| H–C3 | -0.02848 | |
| H–C6 | -0.03022 | 110.8045 |
| H–C8 | -0.02669 | 123.2532 |
| H–C2′ | 105.5393 | |
| H–C5′ | -0.02537 | 105.8795 |
| H–C6′ | -0.01725 | 103.9090 |
| H–O9 | -0.01293 | 102.8659 |
| H–O11 | 107.5006 | |
| H–O12 | -0.01873 | 107.5006 |
| H–O7′ | -0.01459 | |
| H–O8′ | -0.01546 | 77.9537 |
The bold values are the smallest values, indicating the more liable H to be abstracted from the auto-oxidation reaction.
Fig. 2Chromatograms of pristine taxifolin (A and A1) and of taxifolin degraded with 1 M HCl, 30 min (B), 1 mM NaOH, 15 min (C), 30% H2O2, 24 h (D), dry heat, 30 days (E), humid heat, 30 days (F) and photolysis, 2.4 million lx・h (G).
Fig. 3LC-MS of pristine taxifolin (A) and the alkaline forced degradation (0.01 M NaOH immediately neutralized with equimolar HCl) of taxifolin (B).
Degradation products of taxifolin after exposition to different stress conditions, monitored by UPLC-ESI-MS.
| Peak | Retention time | MS [M-H]- in negative ion mode ( | Elemental composition | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxifolin | Stress condition | |||||||||
| 1mM NaOH | 1M HCl | 30% H2O2 | Visible light (2.4 million lx·h) | Visible light negative control | Humid heat 40°C, 75% relative humidity | Dry heat 40 °C | ||||
| 1 | 0.46 | - | - | 197.79 | - | - | - | - | - | C7H3O7 |
| 2 | 0.49 | - | - | - | 162.89 | - | - | - | - | C6H10O5 |
| 3 | 6.47 | 303.05 | 303.05 | 303.05 | 303.06 | 303.05 | 303.05 | 303.06 | 303.05 | C15H12O7 |
| 4 | 6.62 | 303.05 | 303.05 | - | - | 303.05 | 303.05 | - | - | C15H12O7 |
| 5 | 7.10 | - | 723.50 | 723.501 | 723.51 | - | - | 723.52 | - | CHO |
| 6 | 7.54 | 301.04 | - | - | - | 301.04 | 301.04 | - | 301.04 | C15H10O7 |
| 7 | 8.42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 265.14 | CHO |
| 8 | 8.82 | - | - | - | - | 221.12 | 221.12 | - | - | CHO |
| 9 | 10.77 | 265.15 | 265.15 | 265.15 | 265.151 | 265.15 | 265.15 | 265.15 | 265.15 | CHO |
| 10 | 12.46 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 325.18 | |
| 11 | 12.57 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 439.25 | - | CHO |
| 12 | 12.60 | - | - | - | - | 421.23 | - | - | - | CHO |
| 13 | 13.34 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 339.20 | CHO |
| 14 | 14.47 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 439.25 | - | |
| 15 | 14.77 | 281.25 | 281.25 | 281.24 | 281.25 | 281.25 | 281.25 | - | 281.25 | CHO |
Fig. 4Hypothetical alkaline degradation mechanism of taxifolin with 0.01 M NaOH leading to m/z 319.0456 and m/z 337.0568 (A); m/z 605.0964 (B); m/z 603.0787 (C).