Literature DB >> 34012650

Serum calcium improved systemic inflammation marker for predicting survival outcome in rectal cancer.

Zhuokai Zhuang1,2, Xiaolin Wang1, Meijin Huang1,2, Yanxin Luo2, Huichuan Yu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation markers have shown prognostic values with variability in rectal cancer. Considering the association of serum calcium with inflammation, we aimed to examine whether it could improve systemic inflammation markers for survival prediction.
METHODS: We enrolled 508 patients with stage I to III rectal cancer who underwent curative resection. The cohort was grouped by corrected serum calcium (cCa), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and CaPLR (a score model combining cCa with PLR) for survival analysis. The LR (likelihood ratio) test and AIC (Akaike information criterion) were applied to compare models in survival prediction. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).
RESULTS: A total of 26.7% (136/508) patients reached recurrence after curative surgery. Both high cCa (HR 1.486; 95% CI, 1.018-2.171; P=0.040) and high PLR (HR 1.452; 95% CI, 1.059-1.991; P=0.021) were significantly associated with worse DFS. In model comparison, the AIC and LR were improved after cCa was added to PLR model in DFS prediction (AIC: 1,704.83 vs. 1,707.14 vs. 1,707.15; LR: 8.68 vs. 4.37 vs. 4.36; P=0.037). The CaPLR was developed for DFS prediction with adjusted HRs of 2.216 (95% CI, 1.256-3.909; P=0.006) and 1.679 (95% CI, 1.004-2.836; P=0.047) for high and intermediate score group respectively compared to low score group. A nomogram for predicting DFS was generated by using CaPLR and other clinical predictors, with a concordance index of 0.705 (95% CI, 0.620-0.789; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum calcium could improve systemic inflammation markers in survival prediction for patients with rectal cancer. 2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Serum calcium; platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR); rectal cancer; systemic inflammation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34012650      PMCID: PMC8107585          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  40 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ann Goding Sauer; Stacey A Fedewa; Lynn F Butterly; Joseph C Anderson; Andrea Cercek; Robert A Smith; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Radiation Versus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin With Radiation in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Initial Results of the Chinese FOWARC Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Three-Arm Phase III Trial.

Authors:  Yanhong Deng; Pan Chi; Ping Lan; Lei Wang; Weiqing Chen; Long Cui; Daoda Chen; Jie Cao; Hongbo Wei; Xiang Peng; Zonghai Huang; Guanfu Cai; Ren Zhao; Zhongcheng Huang; Lin Xu; Hongfeng Zhou; Yisheng Wei; Hao Zhang; Jian Zheng; Yan Huang; Zhiyang Zhou; Yue Cai; Liang Kang; Meijin Huang; Junsheng Peng; Donglin Ren; Jianping Wang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Inflammation and Cancer: Triggers, Mechanisms, and Consequences.

Authors:  Florian R Greten; Sergei I Grivennikov
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 4.  Are Markers of Systemic Inflammation Good Prognostic Indicators in Colorectal Cancer?

Authors:  Sabrina Rossi; Michele Basso; Antonia Strippoli; Giovanni Schinzari; Ettore D'Argento; Mario Larocca; Alessandra Cassano; Carlo Barone
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.481

5.  Accuracy of methods to estimate ionized and "corrected" serum calcium concentrations in critically ill multiple trauma patients receiving specialized nutrition support.

Authors:  Roland N Dickerson; Kathryn H Alexander; Gayle Minard; Martin A Croce; Rex O Brown
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 6.  The role of the calcium-sensing receptor in cancer.

Authors:  Karin D Rodland
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.817

7.  Serum levels of vitamin D, parathyroid hormone and calcium in relation to survival following breast cancer.

Authors:  Linnea Huss; Salma Butt; Signe Borgquist; Martin Almquist; Johan Malm; Jonas Manjer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  Systemic inflammation in colorectal cancer: Underlying factors, effects, and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Anne E Tuomisto; Markus J Mäkinen; Juha P Väyrynen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Radiation Versus Fluorouracil Plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Final Results of the Chinese FOWARC Trial.

Authors:  Yanhong Deng; Pan Chi; Ping Lan; Lei Wang; Weiqing Chen; Long Cui; Daoda Chen; Jie Cao; Hongbo Wei; Xiang Peng; Zonghai Huang; Guanfu Cai; Ren Zhao; Zhongcheng Huang; Lin Xu; Hongfeng Zhou; Yisheng Wei; Hao Zhang; Jian Zheng; Yan Huang; Zhiyang Zhou; Yue Cai; Liang Kang; Meijin Huang; Xiaojian Wu; Junsheng Peng; Donglin Ren; Jianping Wang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  Serum Calcium Levels and in-Hospital Infection Risk in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Xueping Chen; Xiaoxue Liang; Jun Zhang; Liujing Chen; Jingping Sun; Xueli Cai
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.989

2.  Altered serum calcium homeostasis independently predicts mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Wen Su; Jie-Gao Zhu; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Hui Chen; Wei-Ping Li; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.