| Literature DB >> 34012523 |
Tina Moshaashaee1, Saeed Zavareh2, Shahram Pourbeiranvand1, Mojdeh Salehnia1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Sodium Selenite (SS) supplemented media on oocyte maturation, expression of mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) and embryo quality.Entities:
Keywords: Gene expression; In vitro oocyte maturation; Mice; Mitochondrial transcription factor A; Oocytes; Sodium selenite
Year: 2021 PMID: 34012523 PMCID: PMC8112142 DOI: 10.18502/ajmb.v13i2.5526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Med Biotechnol ISSN: 2008-2835
List of primer
| F: TGTGACGTTGACATCCGTAA | NM-007393 | 64 | |
| F: AAGGGAATGGGAAAGGTAGA | NM-011045 | 76 | |
Developmental rates of in vitro cultured GV oocytes in the Sodium Selenite (SS) treated and non treated groups
| 202 | 176 (87.82±5.75) | 26 (12.18±5.75) | 30 (15.10±5.40) | 8 (7.96±2.90) | 138 (67.17±2.47) | |
| 222 | 201 (90.97±4.69) | 21 (9.03±4.69) | 24 (15.33±6.93) | 9 (8.42±6.62) | 168 (75.65±6.56) |
Significant differences compared with other group in the same column (p<0.05). Seven experimental replicates were performed for each group. GV= Germinal Vesicle, GVBD=Germinal Vesicle Breakdown.
Fertilization and embryonic developmental rates of oocytes treated with Sodium Selenite (SS) treated and non treated groups
| 43 | 35 (81.39%±3.51) | 25 (71.40%±3.51) | 17 (48.50%±2.08) | 8 (22.80%±1.52) | 6 (17.40%±10) | |
| 40 | 28 (70.00%±1.52) [ | 19 (67.80%±2.3) [ | 13 (46.40%±1.52) [ | 5 (17.80%±1.52) [ | 3 (10.71%±10) [ |
Significant differences compared with other group in the same column (p<0.05).
Figure 1Staining of blastocysts derived from in vivo condition (A) and in vitro matured germinal vesicle oocytes in the absence (SS-; B) and presence of Sodium Selenite (SS+; C). The comparison of total cell number of blastocysts in previous groups was shown in part D. Letter a indicated the differences of each group with the control group and letter b showed significant differences between Sodium Selenite treated group with non-treated group (p<0.05).
Figure 2The relative expression of TFAM and β-actin in MII oocytes obtained from in vivo and in vitro conditions in the presence and absence of Sodium Selenite (A). a: significant differences with in vivo group; b: significant differences with non-treated in vitro group (p<0.05). The representative figure of gel electrophoresis of PCR product in studied groups (B). No template control (NTC).