| Literature DB >> 34012521 |
Sorour Shojaeian1, Abdolkarim Moazeni-Roodi2, Abdolamir Allameh3, Ata Garajei4,5, Anoshirvan Kazemnejad6, Kourosh Kabir7, Amir-Hassan Zarnani8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is among the ten most common cancers worldwide. Hypermethylation of CpG sites in the promoter region and subsequent down-regulation of a tumor suppressor gene, TGM-3 has been proposed to be linked to different types of human cancers including OSCC. In this study, methylation status of CpG sites in the promoter region of TGM-3 has been evaluated in a cohort of patients with OSCC compared to normal controls.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; Genetic; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Promoter regions
Year: 2021 PMID: 34012521 PMCID: PMC8112137 DOI: 10.18502/ajmb.v13i2.5523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Med Biotechnol ISSN: 2008-2835
Demographic/clinico-pathologic characteristics and smoking status among patients and controls
| 40 | 40 | - | |
| 49.9±15.7 | 44.1±12.1 | 0.121 | |
| 24/16 | 22/18 | 0.821 | |
| 26/14 | 19/21 | 0.176 | |
| Well differentiated | 22 (55%) | N/A | |
| Moderately differentiated | 12 (30%) | - | |
| Poorly differentiated | 6 (15%) | ||
| I | 8 (20%) | N/A | |
| II | 19 (47.5%) | - | |
| III | 7 (17.5%) | ||
| IV | 6 (15%) | ||
| Lips | 3 (7.5%) | N/A | |
| Tongue | 15 (37.5%) | - | |
| Floor of mouth | 4 (10%) | ||
| Buccal mucosa | 8 (20%) | ||
| Gingiva | 5 (12.5%) | ||
| Hard palate | 5 (12.5%) | ||
Figure 1Examining the quality of DNA and bisulfite-treated DNA amplicons. Quality of DNA was evaluated for extracted DNA (A) and bisulfite-treated DNA amplicons (B) using agarose gel (1% and 2%, respectively) electrophoresis and staining with gel red dye. (A): A single, high molecular weight DNA band was detected with no evidence of shearing and RNA contamination (Lanes 1–4). M: 100 bp DNA ladder marker. (B): The DNA amplicons were detected as a single DNA band related to TGM-3 gene amplification, comparable to 200 bp band (Lanes 1–3). M: 100 bp DNA ladder marker.
Genomic position of assessed CpG sites of regulatory region of TGM-3 gene
| CpG number | CpG1 | CpG2 | CpG3 | CpG4 | CpG5 | CpG6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CpG location | −6604 | −6618 | −6629 | −6657 | −6669 | −6693 |
Comparison of methylation of CpG sites in TGM-3 promoter between OSCC and control groups
| 33.43±1.73 | 22.18±2.49 | <0.001 | |
| 53.04±2.05 | 40.38±1.63 | <0.001 | |
| 45.06±2.01 | 47.00±1.66 | 0.459 | |
| 24.52±1.80 | 12.35±1.67 | <0.001 | |
| 46.91±3.18 | 31.13±3.20 | 0.001 | |
| 62.03±2.75 | 53.31±1.15 | 0.004 |
p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 2Comparison of methylation of CpG sites in TGM-3 promoter between OSCC and control groups. Methylation of cytosine at CpG1 to CpG6 sites was assessed using BSP amplification. The results revealed significant higher methylation at five CpG sites in OSCC patients compared to control group. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 3Comparison of gender-dependent TGM-3 promoter methylation in patients and control groups. The assessment of relation between methylation status and gender in patients (A) and controls (B) revealed that there was only a significant difference in methylation level of CpG3 site in patients. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 4Comparison of the effect of smoking habit on TGM-3 promoter methylation in patient and control groups. Analysis of BSP amplification of the TGM-3 promoter methylation in patient (A) and control (B) groups showed that there was a significant difference related to smoking habit and methylation level of CpG6 site in patients. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Comparison of grade-dependent TGM-3 promoter methylation in patients
| 29.82±2.23 | 37.84±2.36 | 0.019 | |
| 52.32±3.36 | 53.91±2.09 | 0.705 | |
| 39.38±2.36 | 51.99±2.66 | 0.001 | |
| 22.14±2.47 | 27.43±2.51 | 0.144 | |
| 42.59±4.7 | 52.18±3.91 | 0.136 | |
| 59.43±4.4 | 65.20±2.87 | 0.302 |
p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. WD: Well Differentiated, MD: Moderately Differentiated, PD: Poorly Differentiated.
Comparison of stage-dependent TGM-3 promoter methylation in patients
| 30.49±1.86 | 39.53±3.08 | 0.02 | |
| 51.84±2.81 | 55.53±2.45 | 0.408 | |
| 41.13±2.31 | 53.20±2.84 | 0.004 | |
| 23.55±1.93 | 26.52±3.86 | 0.447 | |
| 42.26±4.22 | 56.53±3.12 | 0.01 | |
| 59.52±3.69 | 67.08±3.32 | 0.206 |
p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 5Comparison of grade- and stage-dependent TGM-3 promoter methylation in patients. Analysis of BSP amplification of the TGM-3 promoter showed that there was a statistically significant difference in (A) methylation level of CpG1 and CpG3 in moderately/poorly differentiated (MD/PD) and well differentiated (WD) tumor grades and (B) methylation level of CpG1, CpG3 and CpG5 in tumor stage III/IV and stage I/II patients. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.