Literature DB >> 34011623

The value of anal swab RT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis in adult Indonesian patients.

Murdani Abdullah1,2, Dedy Gunawanjati Sudrajat1, Virly Nanda Muzellina3, Juferdy Kurniawan4, Aulia Rizka5, Amanda Pitarini Utari1, Rabbinu Rangga Pribadi1, Muhammad Firhat Idrus1, Yusra Yusra6, Sofy Meilany7, Andry Surandy1, Hamzah Shatri8, Ikhwan Rinaldi9, Ceva Wicaksono Pitoyo10, Kaka Renaldi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study will test the performance of the anal swab PCR test when compared with the nasopharyngeal swab PCR test as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19.
DESIGN: An observational descriptive study which included hospitalised suspected, or probable cases of hopitalised COVID-19 patients, conducted in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Hospital, Ciputra Hospital, Mitra Keluarga Depok Hospital and Mitra Keluarga Kelapa Gading Hospital, Indonesia. Epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiology data were obtained. Nasopharyngeal and anal swabs specimens were collected for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection.
RESULTS: We analysed 136 subjects as part of this study. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 manifesation in this study was typical of hospitalised patients, with 25% classified as mild cases, 14.7% in severe condition and 12.5% of subjects classified as having acute respiratory distress syndrome. When compared with nasopharyngeal swab as the standard specimen for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen, the sensitivity and specificity of the anal swab was 36.7% and 93.8%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value were 97.8% and 16.5 %, respectively. The performance of the anal swab remained similar when only the subgroup of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (n=92, 67.6%) was analysed (sensitivity 40% and specificity 91.7%). Out of all the subjects included in analysis, 67.6% had gastrointestinal symptoms. Similarly, 73.3% of patients in the anal swab-positive group had gastrointestinal symptoms. The two most common gastrointestinal symptoms in the subjects' population were nausea and anorexia.
CONCLUSION: Anal swab specimen has low sensitivity (36.7%) but high specificity (93.8%) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigen by RT-PCR. Only one additional positive result was found by anal swab among the nasopharyngeal swab-negative group. Anal swab may not be needed as an additional test at the beginning of a patient's diagnostic investigation and nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR remains as the standard diagnostic test for COVID-19. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; anal; diagnostic virology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34011623     DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2054-4774


  3 in total

1.  SARS-CoV-2: Reinfection after 18 Months of a Previous Case with Multiple Negative Nasopharyngeal Swab Tests and Positive Fecal Molecular Test.

Authors:  Carlo Brogna; Barbara Brogna; Domenico Rocco Bisaccia; Marino Giuliano; Luigi Montano; Simone Cristoni; Mauro Petrillo; Marina Piscopo
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 2.  SARS-CoV-2 detection methods: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Galyah Alhamid; Huseyin Tombuloglu; Ali A Rabaan; Ebtesam Al-Suhaimi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Importance of Adequate qPCR Controls in Infection Control.

Authors:  Matthew Oughton; Ivan Brukner; Shaun Eintracht; Andreas I Papadakis; Alan Spatz; Alex Resendes
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.