BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the transmission chains and clusters of COVID-19 infection in Tunisia. METHODS: All cases were confirmed by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction of a nasopharyngeal specimen. Contact tracing is undertaken for all confirmed cases in order to identify close contacts that will be systematically screened and quarantined. Transmission chains were identified based on field investigation, contact tracing, results of screening tests and by assessing all probable mode of transmission and interactions. RESULTS: As of May 18, 2020, 656 cases out of a total of 1043 confirmed cases of Coronavirus disease 2019 belong to 127 transmission chains identified during the epidemic (mean age 42.36 years, Standard deviation 19.56 and sex ratio 0.86). The virus transmission is the most concentrated in the governorate of Tunis (31.5%), Ariana (10.2%) and Ben Arous (10.2%). Virus transmission occurred 50 times (9.72% of secondary transmission events) between two different governorates. A maximum of seven generations of secondary infection was identified, whereas 62% of these secondary infections belong the first generation. A total of 11 "super spreader" cases were identified in this investigation. Four large clusters have been identified. The evolution of secondary cases highlighted two peaks: one in 2nd April and a second in 16 th April whereas imported cases caused local transmission of virus during the early phase of the epidemic. CONCLUSION: Correct contact tracing and early active case finding is useful to identify transmission chains and source of infection in order to contain the widespread transmission in the community.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the transmission chains and clusters of COVID-19infection in Tunisia. METHODS: All cases were confirmed by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction of a nasopharyngeal specimen. Contact tracing is undertaken for all confirmed cases in order to identify close contacts that will be systematically screened and quarantined. Transmission chains were identified based on field investigation, contact tracing, results of screening tests and by assessing all probable mode of transmission and interactions. RESULTS: As of May 18, 2020, 656 cases out of a total of 1043 confirmed cases of Coronavirus disease 2019 belong to 127 transmission chains identified during the epidemic (mean age 42.36 years, Standard deviation 19.56 and sex ratio 0.86). The virus transmission is the most concentrated in the governorate of Tunis (31.5%), Ariana (10.2%) and Ben Arous (10.2%). Virus transmission occurred 50 times (9.72% of secondary transmission events) between two different governorates. A maximum of seven generations of secondary infection was identified, whereas 62% of these secondary infections belong the first generation. A total of 11 "super spreader" cases were identified in this investigation. Four large clusters have been identified. The evolution of secondary cases highlighted two peaks: one in 2nd April and a second in 16 th April whereas imported cases caused local transmission of virus during the early phase of the epidemic. CONCLUSION: Correct contact tracing and early active case finding is useful to identify transmission chains and source of infection in order to contain the widespread transmission in the community.
Authors: Kenneth W Tsang; Pak L Ho; Gaik C Ooi; Wilson K Yee; Teresa Wang; Moira Chan-Yeung; Wah K Lam; Wing H Seto; Loretta Y Yam; Thomas M Cheung; Poon C Wong; Bing Lam; Mary S Ip; Jane Chan; Kwok Y Yuen; Kar N Lai Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sean Wei Xiang Ong; Yian Kim Tan; Po Ying Chia; Tau Hong Lee; Oon Tek Ng; Michelle Su Yen Wong; Kalisvar Marimuthu Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Chang Kyung Kang; Kyoung Ho Song; Pyoeng Gyun Choe; Wan Beom Park; Ji Hwan Bang; Eu Suk Kim; Sang Won Park; Hong Bin Kim; Nam Joong Kim; Sung Il Cho; Jong Koo Lee; Myoung Don Oh Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Sun Young Cho; Ji-Man Kang; Young Eun Ha; Ga Eun Park; Ji Yeon Lee; Jae-Hoon Ko; Ji Yong Lee; Jong Min Kim; Cheol-In Kang; Ik Joon Jo; Jae Geum Ryu; Jong Rim Choi; Seonwoo Kim; Hee Jae Huh; Chang-Seok Ki; Eun-Suk Kang; Kyong Ran Peck; Hun-Jong Dhong; Jae-Hoon Song; Doo Ryeon Chung; Yae-Jean Kim Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J S M Peiris; C M Chu; V C C Cheng; K S Chan; I F N Hung; L L M Poon; K I Law; B S F Tang; T Y W Hon; C S Chan; K H Chan; J S C Ng; B J Zheng; W L Ng; R W M Lai; Y Guan; K Y Yuen Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Victor M Corman; Ali M Albarrak; Ali Senosi Omrani; Mohammed M Albarrak; Mohamed Elamin Farah; Malak Almasri; Doreen Muth; Andrea Sieberg; Benjamin Meyer; Abdullah M Assiri; Tabea Binger; Katja Steinhagen; Erik Lattwein; Jaffar Al-Tawfiq; Marcel A Müller; Christian Drosten; Ziad A Memish Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Sarah Ee Fang Yong; Danielle Elizabeth Anderson; Wycliffe E Wei; Junxiong Pang; Wan Ni Chia; Chee Wah Tan; Yee Leong Teoh; Priyanka Rajendram; Matthias Paul Han Sim Toh; Cuiqin Poh; Valerie T J Koh; Joshua Lum; Nur-Afidah Md Suhaimi; Po Ying Chia; Mark I-Cheng Chen; Shawn Vasoo; Benjamin Ong; Yee Sin Leo; Linfa Wang; Vernon J M Lee Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Joel Hellewell; Sam Abbott; Amy Gimma; Nikos I Bosse; Christopher I Jarvis; Timothy W Russell; James D Munday; Adam J Kucharski; W John Edmunds; Sebastian Funk; Rosalind M Eggo Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 26.763