| Literature DB >> 34011058 |
Jieun Kim1, Kyoungsik Jeong, Siwoo Lee, Bok-Nam Seo, Younghwa Baek.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Diet plays a crucial role as a modifiable risk factor related to the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its cluster. Constitution type of traditional Korean medicine has shown accuracy to predict the risk for MetS. We attempted to examine the association between nutritional status, pre-MetS, and its cluster in Korean adults by their constitution type.Participants aged 30 to 55 years who had no cancer or cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were assigned to join in the present study. Pre-MetS was defined as ≥2 of the following factors: abdominal obesity; elevated triglycerides (TG); reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); elevated blood pressure (BP); and elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Constitution type was categorized into Tae-Eumin (TE) or non-TE. Dietary assessment of the subjects were surveyed using a short-form of the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and the nutrition quotient (NQ), which uses 4 factors, namely, balance, diversity, moderation, and dietary behavior.A total of 986 subjects were evaluated by constitution type with MetS status. Of these subjects, 48.6% had pre-MetS, 89.5% were obese and had the highest waist circumference (WC) in Pre-MetS TE. BP, FPG, TG were higher, while HDL-C was lower, than normal TE or non-TE both in Pre-MetS TE and non-TE. The prevalence of pre-MetS was positively associated with lower status of dietary behavior (odds ratio [ORs]: 2.153, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.179-3.931) while negatively related to higher vegetables and fruits intakes (ORs: 0.594, 95% CI: 0.359-0.983) in TE. Lower status of NQ had about 2 times higher risk of Pre-MetS (ORs: 1.855, 95% CI: 1.018-3.380) and abdominal obesity (ORs: 2.035, 95% CI: 1.097-3.775) in TE compared with higher status of NQ after controlling for covariates.Poor diet was a key contributor to the development of Pre-MetS and abdominal obesity in Korean adults with TE. Customized nutrition care and integrated medicinal approaches are strongly suggested to conduct optimal preventive care for people who are vulnerable to health risk.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34011058 PMCID: PMC8137084 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Flow diagram illustrating the selection of subjects for analysis. 1. Pre-Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined as having two or more of the following: elevated triglycerides: ≥150 mg/dL or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides as an alternate indicator. Reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C): <40 mg/dL in men and <50 mg/dL in women or drug treatment for reduced HDL-C as an alternate indicator. Elevated fasting glucose: ≥100 mg/dL or drug treatment of elevated glucose as an alternate indicator. Elevated blood pressure: systolic BP (SBP) ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥85 mm Hg or on antihypertensive medication. Elevated waist circumference: ≥90 cm in men and ≥85 cm in women Cut-off point for waist circumference was based on the Asia-Pacific. World Health Organization guideline. 2. Constitution type was categorized into 2 groups; Non-TE = So-eumin and So-yangin, TE = Tae-eumin.
Group differences in sociodemographic characteristics and MetS cluster of the subjects according to constitution type∗ with MetS status†.
| All (n = 986) | Pre-MetS (n = 308) | Normal (n = 678) | |||||
| Characteristics | TE (n = 488) | Non-TE (n = 498) | TE (n = 237) | Non-TE (n = 71) | TE (n = 251) | Non-TE (n = 427) | |
| Age, y | 44.1 ± 0.3 | 44.6 ± 0.3 | 45.6 ± 0.4b | 48.1 ± 0.8¶ | 42.6 ± 0.4c | 44.0 ± 0.3c | <.0001 |
| 30–44 years (n, %) | 252 (51.6) | 251 (50.4) | 98 (41.4) | 22 (31.0) | 154 (61.4) | 229 (53.6) | <.0001 |
| 45–55 years | 236 (48.4) | 247 (49.6) | 139 (58.6) | 49 (69.0) | 97 (38.6) | 200 (46.4) | |
| Gender (%) | |||||||
| Male | 162 (33.4) | 97 (19.5) | 95 (40.1) | 29 (40.9) | 67 (26.7) | 68 (15.9) | <.0001 |
| Female | 326 (66.6) | 401 (80.5) | 142 (59.9) | 42 (59.2) | 184 (73.3) | 359 (84.1) | |
| Marital status (%) | |||||||
| Unmarried | 47 (9.6) | 38 (7.6) | 17 (7.2) | 2 (2.8) | 30 (12.0) | 36 (8.4) | .206 |
| Married | 415 (85.0) | 437 (87.8) | 208 (87.8) | 67 (94.4) | 207 (82.5) | 370 (86.7) | |
| Never-married | 26 (5.3) | 23 (4.6) | 12 (5.0) | 2 (2.8) | 14 (5.5) | 21 (4.9) | |
| Education (%) | |||||||
| High school lower levels | 173 (35.5) | 169 (33.9) | 101 (42.6) | 20 (28.2) | 72 (28.7) | 149 (34.9) | .008 |
| College and higher levels | 315 (64.5) | 329 (66.1) | 136 (57.4) | 51 (71.8) | 179 (71.3) | 278 (65.1) | |
| Household income‡ (%) | |||||||
| Low | 121 (25.0) | 92 (18.7) | 66 (28.0) | 6 (8.57) | 55 (22.1) | 86 (20.4) | .004 |
| Middle | 326 (67.2) | 344 (69.9) | 148 (62.7) | 53 (74.6) | 178 (71.5) | 291 (69.1) | |
| High | 38 (7.8) | 56 (11.4) | 22 (9.3) | 12 (16.9) | 16 (6.4) | 44 (10.5) | |
| Weight status§ (%) | |||||||
| BMI, kg/m2 <25 | 143 (29.3) | 480 (96.4) | 25 (10.5) | 62 (87.3) | 118 (47.0) | 418 (97.9) | <.0001 |
| 25 ≤ BMI, kg/m2 | 345 (70.7) | 18 (3.6) | 212 (89.5) | 9 (12.7) | 133 (53.0) | 9 (2.1) | |
| Disease history (%) | |||||||
| Hypertension | 123 (25.2) | 58 (11.7) | 106 (44.7) | 32 (45.1) | 17 (6.8) | 26 (6.1) | <.0001 |
| Diabetes | 20 (4.1) | 6 (1.2) | 20 (8.4) | 5 (7.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.2) | <.0001 |
| Dyslipidemia | 144 (29.5) | 96 (19.3) | 114 (48.1) | 39 (54.9) | 30 (12.0) | 8 (13.4) | <.0001 |
| MetS cluster (mean ± SE) | |||||||
| WC, cm | 87.6 ± 8.5 | 75.9 ± 6.2 | 92.4 ± 0.4¶ | 80.5 ± 0.8c | 84.7 ± 0.4b | 76.9 ± 0.3d | <.0001 |
| SBP, mmHg | 122.8 ± 15.1 | 115.9 ± 14.0 | 130.1 ± 0.8¶ | 130.4 ± 1.5¶ | 117.5 ± 0.8b | 114.9 ± 0.7b | <.0001 |
| DBP, mmHg | 76.4 ± 12.6 | 70.9 ± 11.0 | 82.2 ± 0.7¶ | 82.0 ± 1.3¶ | 73.1 ± 0.7b | 71.4 ± 0.6b | <.0001 |
| Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL | 86.6 ± 17.8 | 81.7 ± 13.1 | 91.3 ± 1.0¶ | 91.6 ± 1.8¶ | 83.3 ± 1.0b | 81.1 ± 0.8b | <.0001 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 53.5 ± 12.6 | 61.3 ± 14.2 | 47.3 ± 0.8c | 47.7 ± 1.4c | 57.5 ± 0.8b | 61.6 ± 0.7¶ | <.0001 |
| TG, mg/dL | 142.3 ± 113.9 | 108.6 ± 80.9 | 195.8 ± 5.7¶ | 202.9 ± 10.4¶ | 108.0 ± 5.7b | 109.1 ± 4.7b | <.0001 |
Group differences in nutritional status of the subjects according to constitution type with Mets status.
| Pre-MetS (n = 308) | Normal (n = 678) | ||||
| Variables | TE (n = 237) | Non-TE (n = 71) | TE (n = 251) | Non-TE (n = 427) | |
| Energy, kcal/d∗ | |||||
| Men | 2222.7 ± 69.5 | 2417.0 ± 128.6 | 2166.3 ± 84.7 | 2277.0 ± 81.7 | .419 |
| Women | 2115.8 ± 58.0 | 2034.9 ± 106.8 | 2004.3 ± 50.8 | 1952.5 ± 36.3 | .125 |
| Macronutrients† | |||||
| Carbohydrates, g | 324.5 ± 7.2 | 330.3 ± 13.2 | 311.1 ± 7.3 | 313.9 ± 6.0 | .403 |
| Fat, g | 54.1 ± 1.6 | 53.6 ± 2.8 | 52.8 ± 1.6 | 50.3 ± 1.3 | .231 |
| Protein, g | 72.7 ± 1.7 | 72.8 ± 3.2 | 70.4 ± 1.8 | 68.3 ± 1.5 | .215 |
| C : F : P, % | 59.7:22.1:13.2 | 59.4:21.6:13.1 | 59.5:22.6:13.4 | 60.4:21.8:13.1 | N/S |
| FFQ, times/wk† | |||||
| White rice | 16.1 ± 0.4 | 16.7 ± 0.7 | 15.8 ± 0.4 | 16.5 ± 0.3 | .358 |
| Mixed rice | 7.4 ± 0.5 | 7.2 ± 0.9 | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 7.5 ± 0.4 | .752 |
| Noodles/bread | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.2 | .364 |
| Potatoes/sweet potatoes | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | .870 |
| Beans/tofu | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.8 | 5.8 ± 0.4 | 5.0 ± 0.3 | .177 |
| Fish | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | .839 |
| Beef/pork | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | .677 |
| Poultry | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | .639 |
| Eggs | 4.2 ± 0.2§,b | 3.8 ± 0.4§,b | 4.5 ± 0.2§ | 3.8 ± 0.2b | .043 |
| Vegetables/fruits | 10.0 ± 0.6 | 12.0 ± 1.2 | 11.0 ± 0.6 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | .423 |
| Seaweeds | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | .673 |
| Milk/yogurt | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.4 | .249 |
| Total NQ†,‡ | 52.8 ± 0.6 | 53.9 ± 1.0 | 54.8 ± 0.5 | 53.2 ± 0.4 | .047 |
| Balance | 29.4 ± 0.9§,b | 31.5 ± 1.6§,b | 32.6 ± 0.9§ | 29.6 ± 0.7b | .021 |
| Diversity | 58.8 ± 1.0§,b | 58.4 ± 1.8§,b | 59.6 ± 1.0§ | 55.5 ± 0.7b | .004 |
| Moderation | 73.2 ± 0.8 | 74.7 ± 1.5 | 73.4 ± 0.8 | 74.4 ± 0.6 | .573 |
| Dietary behavior | 44.0 ± 0.9b | 45.3 ± 1.6§,b | 48.6 ± 0.9§ | 48.0 ± 0.7§ | .001 |
Dietary factors associated with Pre-MetS according to constitution type of the subjects.
| Model I ORs (95% CI) | Model II ORs (95% CI) | |||
| TE | Non-TE | TE | Non-TE | |
| Dietary behavior | (ref: High)∗ | |||
| Middle | 1.382 (0.857–2.229) | 1.228 (0.628–2.402) | 1.383 (0.825–2.316) | 1.185 (0.596–2.357) |
| Low | 2.070 (0.964–4.446) | |||
| | 0.0642 | |||
| Vegetables and fruits | (ref: Low)† | |||
| Middle | 0.787 (0.502–1.236) | 0.640 (0.316–1.295) | 0.628 (0.369–1.071) | 0.501 (0.231–1.087) |
| High | 0.999 (0.524–1.903) | 0.852 (0.435–1.669) | ||
| | 0.421 | 0.172 | 0.118 | 0.250 |
Figure 2Associations between low status of the total NQ1 and prevalence of Pre-MetS and its cluster by constitution type2 of the subjects. 1Total Nutrient quotient (NQ): Three different grades (high: 75–100% tile, middle: 25% to <75% tile, low: 0% to <25% tile) were assigned according to the total NQ score, and a higher score indicated better dietary behaviors. 2Constitution type was categorized into 2 groups; TE: Tae-eumin (TE); Non-TE: So-eumin (SE) and So-yangin (SY) ∗P for trend was tested across 3 levels (low–high) of the 4 factors of NQ by including the median score as a continuous measure in the regression model. Adjusted covariates were included age, sex, education level, household income, and weight status.