| Literature DB >> 34010153 |
Weidi Wang1, Lingjun Kong2, Hongkun Guo1, Xiangjin Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presence of clinically negative nodules on the contralateral lobe is common in patients with unilateral papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). The appropriate operational strategies of contralateral thyroid nodules remain controversial. In this study, we analyzed clinical features that could be predictors for malignancy of contralateral thyroid nodules coexisting with diagnosed unilateral PTMC.Entities:
Keywords: contralateral thyroid nodules; meta-analysis; risk factors; unilateral PTMC
Year: 2021 PMID: 34010153 PMCID: PMC8240708 DOI: 10.1530/EC-21-0164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocr Connect ISSN: 2049-3614 Impact factor: 3.335
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Study (author, year) | Study design | Country | Median age (range) | No. of carcinoma/no. of case(%) | Surgical intervention | Surgical time span | Quality assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bom Seok Koo 2010 (6) | Retrospective | Korea | 48 | 18/74 (24.3%) | TT | 2005–2009 | 8 |
| Connor Matt 2011 (7) | Retrospective | USA | 43 | 1/13 (7.7%) | TT | 1998–2008 | 8 |
| Li Wei Meng 2012 (8) | Retrospective | China | 48 | 53/253 (20.9%) | TT/NTT | 2007–2011 | 8 |
| Ming Yang 2013 (9) | Retrospective | China | 56 | 19/90 (21.1%) | TT/NTT | 2009–2012 | 7 |
| Sung Yong Choi 2013 (10) | Retrospective | Korea | 51 | 16/106 (15.1%) | TT | 2005–2009 | 8 |
| Han Feng Wan 2014 (11) | Retrospective | China | 40.5 | 42/97 (43.3%) | TT/NTT | 2011–2013 | 7 |
| Young Chan Lee 2015 (12) | Retrospective | Korea | 53 | 51/241 (21.2%) | TT | 2007–2013 | 9 |
| Zeng Gui Wu 2016 (13) | Retrospective | China | 48 | 100/347 (28.9%) | TT/NTT | 2011–2015 | 9 |
NTT, nearly total thyroidectomy; TT, total thyroidectomy.
Figure 1Flowchart of the study selection.
Figure 2Forest plots of the pooled prevalence of carcinoma in contralateral nodules.
Figure 3Forest plot for the meta-analysis of studies reporting on the association with the risk of contralateral carcinoma of (A) age, (B) sex, (C) size of primary lesion, (D) ipsilateral central lymph node metastasis, (E) multifocality of contralateral lesion.
Summary of data synthesis.
| Clinical features | OR (95% CI) | Heterogeneity | Pub bias | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q test | I 2 (%) | Harbord test | |||
| Age | 1.16 (0.82–1.64) | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0 | 0.154 |
| Sex | 0.84 (0.56–1.26) | 0.40 | 0.63 | 0 | 0.516 |
| Size of primary lesion | 1.18 (0.67–2.09) | 0.57 | 0.04 | 59 | 0.541 |
| Ipsilateral central lymph node metastasis | 1.16 (0.83–1.62) | 0.37 | 0.58 | 0 | 0.490 |
| HT | 1.57 (1.13–2.20) | 0.008 | 0.24 | 28 | 0.333 |
| Multifocality of primary lesion | 3.93 (2.70–5.73) | <0.00001 | 0.87 | 0 | 0.025 |
| Multifocality of contralateral lesion | 1.32 (0.56–3.10) | 0.52 | 0.04 | 68 | 0.220 |
| Capsular invasion | 1.61 (1.10–2.36) | 0.01 | 0.38 | 2 | 0.115 |
Figure 4Forest plots of the association between HT and contralateral carcinoma.
Figure 5Forest plots of the association between multifocality of primary lesion and contralateral carcinoma.
Figure 6Forest plots of the association between capsular invasion and contralateral carcinoma.
GRADE summary of findings.
| Outcomes | No of participants (studies), follow up | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Relative effect* (95% CI) | Anticipated absolute effects | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk with benign nodule | Risk difference contralateral cancer | ||||
| Age | 764 (4 observational studies) | ⨁⨁◯◯ | OR 1.16 (0.82–1.64) | 228 per 1000 | 27 more per 1000 (33 fewer to 98 more) |
| Sex | 967 (6 observational studies) | ⨁⨁◯◯ | OR 0.84 (0.56–1.26) | 262 per 1000 | 32 fewer per 1000 (96 fewer to 47 more) |
| Size of primary lesion | 601 (5 observational studies) | ⨁⨁◯◯ | OR 1.18 (0.67–2.09) | 195 per 1000 | 27 more per 1000 (55 fewer to 141 more) |
| CLNM | 890 (4 observational studies) | ⨁⨁◯◯ | OR 1.16 (0.83–1.62) | 237 per 1000 | 28 more per 1000 (32 fewer to 98 more) |
| HT | 931 (4 observational studies) | ⨁⨁◯◯ | OR 1.57 (1.13–2.20) | 220 per 1000 | 87 more per 1000 (22 more to 163 more) |
| Multifocality of primary lesion | 764 (4 observational studies) | ⨁◯◯◯ | OR 3.93 (2.70–5.73) | 189 per 1000 | 289 more per 1000 (197 more to 383 more) |
| Multifocality of contralateral lesion | 690 (3 observational studies) | ⨁◯◯◯ | OR 1.32 (0.56–3.10) | 204 per 1000 | 49 more per 1000 (79 fewer to 239 more) |
| Capsular invasion | 764 (4 observational studies) | ⨁⨁◯◯ | OR 1.61 (1.10–2.36) | 223 per 1000 | 93 more per 1000 (17 more to 181 more) |
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI); aThe Harbord test result for multifocality of primary lesion suggests that the presence of publication bias may distort the meta-analysis; bHigh I2 (68%) and non-overlapping CI suggest that important inconsistency which lowers our certainty in effect; cWide CIs do not exclude important benefit or harm which lowers our certainty in effect.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence – High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect; Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate, the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different; Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited, the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect; Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate, the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.