| Literature DB >> 34009259 |
Alexis Ntabona1, Arsene Binanga2, Mr Désiré Josué Bapitani3, Beatrice Bobo3, Bitshi Mukengeshayi4, Pierre Akilimali5, Gloria Kalong6, Zenon Mujani2,7, Julie Hernandez6, Jane T Bertrand6.
Abstract
In Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), modern contraceptive prevalence is low by international standards: 29.6% as of 2020. A 2015 pilot study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of using medical and nursing students to administer DMPA-SC (the subcutaneous injection) among other methods at the community level. The more far-reaching discovery was the potential of clinically trained students to increase access to low-cost contraception in the short-run, while improving the quality of service delivery for future generations of healthcare providers. Scale-up involved integrating the family planning curriculum into the training of nursing students, including classroom instruction in contraceptive technology and service delivery, coupled with a year-long field practicum in which students offered a range of contraceptive methods during intermittent outreach events, door-to-door distribution or sales from their homes. Starting in 2015, a multi-agency team consisting of an international non-governmental organizations (NGO), several Ministry of Health directorates and a local NGO used the ExpandNet/WHO framework to guide this scale-up. This article details the nine steps in the scale-up process. It presents results on increases in contraceptive uptake, feedback from participating nursing school personnel and the employment experience of the graduates from this programme. Between 2015 and 2019, the family planning curriculum was incorporated into 30.8% of the 477 nursing schools in 7 of the 26 provinces in the DRC. Students delivered 461 769 couple-years of protection (the key output indicator for family planning programmes). Nursing school personnel were strongly favourable to the approach, although they needed continued support to adequately implement a set of additional interventions related to the service delivery components of the new training approach. Post-graduation, only 40.1% of graduates had paid employment (reflecting the staggering unemployment in the DRC); among those, over 90% used their family planning training in their work. We describe the multiple challenges faced during the scale-up process and in planning for expansion to additional schools.Entities:
Keywords: Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC); Scale-up; community-based services; contraception; family planning; nursing students
Year: 2021 PMID: 34009259 PMCID: PMC8227455 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czab014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Policy Plan ISSN: 0268-1080 Impact factor: 3.344
Figure 1Number of partner organizations supporting family planning in the 519 health zones of the DRC, as of 2017 (source: CHAI survey).
Figure 2Provinces in which the community-based family planning services module was incorporated into the curriculum of third-year nursing students in the DRC, with start date.
Figure 3Number of schools in which the new family planning module was incorporated, by year and by province (note: the red bar denotes the total number of schools per year that incorporated the training).
Total volume of CYP generated by students per year and per province
| Province | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Total CYP 2016–2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinshasa | 327 | 33 196 | 97 474 | 186 833 | 317 829 |
| Kongo Central | 9 | 4659 | 49 996 | 52 846 | 107 510 |
| Lualaba | 1273 | 3728 | 9547 | 14 547 | |
| Ht Katanga | 6302 | 6302 | |||
| Nord Kivu | 8862 | 8862 | |||
| Sud Kivu | 4063 | 4063 | |||
| Tshopo | 2655 | 2655 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 4Mean CYP provided per trained student and per year for each province.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the nursing graduates
Total
| Overall | Kinshasa | Kongo central | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| Age (mean ±SD) | 25.4 ± 7.5 | 24.0 ± 6.4 | 31.7 ± 9.0*** | |||
| Age (years) | *** | |||||
| <25 ans | 183 | 67.3 | 176 | 78.9 | 7 | 14.3 |
| 25–29 ans | 43 | 15.8 | 25 | 11.2 | 18 | 36.7 |
| ≥ 30 ans | 46 | 16.9 | 22 | 9.9 | 24 | 49.0 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 67 | 24.6 | 60 | 26.9 | 7 | 14.3 |
| Female | 205 | 75.4 | 163 | 73.1 | 42 | 85.7 |
| Marital status | *** | |||||
| Never married | 228 | 83.8 | 197 | 88.3 | 31 | 63.3 |
| widowed/divorced | 5 | 1.8 | 3 | 1.3 | 2 | 4.1 |
| Married/in union | 39 | 14.3 | 23 | 10.3 | 16 | 32.7 |
| Living children | *** | |||||
| No | 199 | 73.2 | 184 | 82.5 | 15 | 30.6 |
| Yes | 73 | 26.8 | 39 | 17.5 | 34 | 69.4 |
| Living children | * | |||||
| 1–3 | 58 | 79.5 | 27 | 69.2 | 31 | 91.2 |
| 4+ | 15 | 20.5 | 12 | 30.8 | 3 | 8.8 |
| 73 | 100.0 | 39 | 100.0 | 34 | 100.0 | |
SD, standard deviation; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Experience with family planning training in nursing school
| Overall | Kinshasa | Kongo Central | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| Year graduation |
| |||||
| 2015–16 | 26 | 9.6 | 25 | 11.2 | 1 | 2.0 |
| 2017 | 104 | 38.2 | 72 | 32.3 | 32 | 65.3 |
| 2018 | 142 | 52.2 | 126 | 56.5 | 16 | 32.7 |
| Received training on contraceptive meth |
| |||||
| No | 18 | 6.6 | 18 | 8.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Yes | 254 | 93.4 | 205 | 91.9 | 49 | 100.0 |
| Participated in campaign event |
| |||||
| No | 20 | 7.4 | 20 | 9.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Yes | 252 | 92.6 | 203 | 91.0 | 49 | 100.0 |
| Taught self-injection | ||||||
| No | 119 | 43.7 | 101 | 45.3 | 18 | 36.7 |
| Yes | 153 | 56.3 | 122 | 54.7 | 31 | 63.3 |
| Provided Implanon NXT |
| |||||
| No | 29 | 10.7 | 29 | 13.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Yes | 243 | 89.3 | 194 | 87.0 | 49 | 100.0 |
| Satisfaction with FP training at School |
| |||||
| Completely satisfied | 191 | 75.2 | 146 | 71.2 | 45 | 91.8 |
| Somewhat satisfied | 63 | 24.8 | 59 | 28.8 | 4 | 8.2 |
| Usefulness of FP training |
| |||||
| Completely useful | 221 | 87.0 | 173 | 84.4 | 48 | 98.0 |
| Somewhat useful | 33 | 13.0 | 32 | 15.6 | 1 | 2.0 |
| Total | 272 | 100.0 | 223 | 100.0 | 49 | 100.0 |
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01;
P < 0.001.
Among those who training on contraceptive methods.
Employment status and use of family planning training post-graduation
| Overall | Kinshasa | Kongo Central | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| Currently employed |
| |||||
| No | 162 | 59.6 | 142 | 63.7 | 20 | 40.8 |
| Yes | 110 | 40.4 | 81 | 36.3 | 29 | 59.2 |
| Place of employment ( | ||||||
| Public hospital/health centre | 31 | 28.2 | 20 | 24.7 | 11 | 38.0 |
| Private hospital/health centre | 58 | 52.7 | 47 | 58.0 | 11 | 38.0 |
| Pharmacy | 14 | 12.7 | 9 | 11.1 | 5 | 17.2 |
| Others | 7 | 6.4 | 5 | 6.2 | 2 | 6.8 |
| Opportunity to provide FP in current job ( |
| |||||
| No | 10 | 9.1 | 10 | 12.3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Yes | 100 | 90.9 | 71 | 87.7 | 29 | 100.0 |
| Type of FP work ( | ||||||
| Counselling | 99 | 99.0 | 70 | 98.6 | 29 | 100.0 |
| Contraceptive provision | 81 | 81.0 | 58 | 81.7 | 23 | 79.3 |
| Referral | 39 | 39.0 | 36 | 50.7 | 3 | 10.3 |
| Other | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1.4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Training helpful in current work |
| |||||
| No | 29 | 10.7 | 28 | 12.6 | 1 | 2.0 |
| UYes | 230 | 84.6 | 182 | 81.6 | 48 | 98.0 |
| Don’t know | 13 | 4.8 | 13 | 5.8 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Ever provided FP services as volunteer |
| |||||
| No | 62 | 23.8 | 59 | 27.8 | 3 | 6.2 |
| Yes | 198 | 76.2 | 153 | 72.2 | 45 | 93.8 |
| Ever provided services at National FP day |
| |||||
| No | 194 | 71.3 | 147 | 65.9 | 47 | 95.9 |
| Yes | 78 | 28.7 | 76 | 34.1 | 2 | 4.1 |
| Ever provided services at campaign (Lelo PF) |
| |||||
| No | 150 | 55.1 | 111 | 49.8 | 39 | 79.6 |
| Yes | 122 | 44.9 | 112 | 50.2 | 10 | 20.4 |
| Total | 272 | 100.0 | 223 | 100.0 | 49 | 100.0 |
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01;
P < 0.001.
Among those employed.
More than one response possible and percentage is calculated for those who got Opportunity to provide FP in current job.
Factors associated with use of the family planning training on the job
| Use of the FP training on the Job | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||||||||
|
|
| % |
| % | crude OR | 95% CI | Adjust OR | 95% CI | |
| Age (years) | |||||||||
| <25 | 71 | 48 | 67.6 | 23 | 32.4 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 25–29 | 141 | 91 | 64.5 | 50 | 35.5 | 1.15 | 0.63–2.09 | 1.03 | 0.53–1.99 |
| ≥30 | 42 | 15 | 35.7 | 27 | 64.3 | 3.76 | 1.68–8.39 | 5.61 | 1.68–18.76 |
| Sex | |||||||||
| Male | 66 | 35 | 53.0 | 31 | 47.0 | 1.53 | 0.87–2.69 | 1.92 | 1.04–3.56 |
| Female | 188 | 119 | 63.3 | 69 | 36.7 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Marital status | |||||||||
| Not married | 218 | 135 | 61.9 | 83 | 38.1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Married/in union | 36 | 19 | 52.8 | 17 | 47.2 | 1.46 | 0.72–2.96 | 0.58 | 0.20–1.72 |
| Living children | |||||||||
| No | 183 | 117 | 63.9 | 66 | 36.1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 71 | 37 | 52.1 | 34 | 47.9 | 1.63 | 0.93–2.84 | 0.58 | 0.23–1.45 |
| Province | |||||||||
| Kinshasa | 205 | 134 | 65.4 | 71 | 34.6 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Kongo central | 49 | 20 | 40.8 | 29 | 59.2 | 2.74 | 1.45–5.18 | 2.70 | 1.22–6.00 |
| Year graduation | |||||||||
| 2015–16 | 25 | 13 | 52.0 | 12 | 48.0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2017 | 89 | 50 | 56.2 | 39 | 43.8 | 0.85 | 0.34–2.06 | 0.53 | 0.20–1.40 |
| 2018 | 140 | 91 | 65.0 | 49 | 35.0 | 0.58 | 0.25–1.38 | 0.52 | 0.21–1.33 |
| Total | 254 | 154 | 60.6 | 100 | 39.4 | ||||
This table is based on those respondents who reported to have received training in contraceptive methods.