Liza van Eijk1,2,3,4, Brendan P Zietsch3. 1. Department of Psychology, College of Healthcare Sciences, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Douglas, Queensland, Australia. 2. The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Herston, Queensland, Australia. 3. Centre for Psychology and Evolution, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia. 4. Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is more common in males than females and has been linked to male-typical behavior. Accordingly, the "Extreme Male Brain" hypothesis suggests that ASD is associated with an exaggeratedly male-typical brain. To test this hypothesis, we derived a data-driven measure of individual differences along a male-female dimension based on sex differences in subcortical brain shape (i.e., brain maleness) by training our algorithm on two population samples (Queensland Twin IMaging study and Human Connectome Project; combined N = 2153). We then applied this algorithm to two clinical datasets (Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange I and II; ASD N = 1060; neurotypical controls N = 1166) to obtain a brain maleness score for each individual, representing maleness of their brain on a male-female continuum. Consistent with the Extreme Male Brain hypothesis, we found a higher mean brain maleness score in the ASD group than in controls (d = 0.20 [0.12-0.29]), parallel to higher scores for control males than control females (d = 1.17 [1.05-1.29]). Further, brain maleness was positively associated with autistic symptoms. We tested the possibility this finding was driven by the ASD group's larger brains than controls (d = 0.17 [0.08-0.25]), given that males had larger brains than females (d = 0.96 [0.84-1.07]). Indeed, after adjusting for differences in brain size, the brain maleness difference between the ASD group and controls disappeared, and no association with autistic symptoms remained (after controlling for multiple comparisons), suggesting greater maleness of the autistic brain is driven by brain size. Brain maleness may be influenced by the same factors that influence brain size. LAY SUMMARY: A popular theory proposes that individuals with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) have an "extreme male brain", but this has not been subject to rigorous, direct tests. We developed a measure of individual differences along a male-female dimension and then derived this measure for 1060 individuals with ASD and 1166 neurotypical controls. Individuals with ASD had slightly more male-type brains. However, this difference is accounted for by males and individuals with ASD having relatively larger brains than females and controls, respectively.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is more common in males than females and has been linked to male-typical behavior. Accordingly, the "Extreme Male Brain" hypothesis suggests that ASD is associated with an exaggeratedly male-typical brain. To test this hypothesis, we derived a data-driven measure of individual differences along a male-female dimension based on sex differences in subcortical brain shape (i.e., brain maleness) by training our algorithm on two population samples (Queensland Twin IMaging study and Human Connectome Project; combined N = 2153). We then applied this algorithm to two clinical datasets (Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange I and II; ASD N = 1060; neurotypical controls N = 1166) to obtain a brain maleness score for each individual, representing maleness of their brain on a male-female continuum. Consistent with the Extreme Male Brain hypothesis, we found a higher mean brain maleness score in the ASD group than in controls (d = 0.20 [0.12-0.29]), parallel to higher scores for control males than control females (d = 1.17 [1.05-1.29]). Further, brain maleness was positively associated with autistic symptoms. We tested the possibility this finding was driven by the ASD group's larger brains than controls (d = 0.17 [0.08-0.25]), given that males had larger brains than females (d = 0.96 [0.84-1.07]). Indeed, after adjusting for differences in brain size, the brain maleness difference between the ASD group and controls disappeared, and no association with autistic symptoms remained (after controlling for multiple comparisons), suggesting greater maleness of the autistic brain is driven by brain size. Brain maleness may be influenced by the same factors that influence brain size. LAY SUMMARY: A popular theory proposes that individuals with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) have an "extreme male brain", but this has not been subject to rigorous, direct tests. We developed a measure of individual differences along a male-female dimension and then derived this measure for 1060 individuals with ASD and 1166 neurotypical controls. Individuals with ASD had slightly more male-type brains. However, this difference is accounted for by males and individuals with ASD having relatively larger brains than females and controls, respectively.
Authors: Madhura Ingalhalikar; Alex Smith; Drew Parker; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; Hakon Hakonarson; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Ragini Verma Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Siyuan Liu; Jakob Seidlitz; Jonathan D Blumenthal; Liv S Clasen; Armin Raznahan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Adriana Di Martino; David O'Connor; Bosi Chen; Kaat Alaerts; Jeffrey S Anderson; Michal Assaf; Joshua H Balsters; Leslie Baxter; Anita Beggiato; Sylvie Bernaerts; Laura M E Blanken; Susan Y Bookheimer; B Blair Braden; Lisa Byrge; F Xavier Castellanos; Mirella Dapretto; Richard Delorme; Damien A Fair; Inna Fishman; Jacqueline Fitzgerald; Louise Gallagher; R Joanne Jao Keehn; Daniel P Kennedy; Janet E Lainhart; Beatriz Luna; Stewart H Mostofsky; Ralph-Axel Müller; Mary Beth Nebel; Joel T Nigg; Kirsten O'Hearn; Marjorie Solomon; Roberto Toro; Chandan J Vaidya; Nicole Wenderoth; Tonya White; R Cameron Craddock; Catherine Lord; Bennett Leventhal; Michael P Milham Journal: Sci Data Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Andrew C Stanfield; Andrew M McIntosh; Michael D Spencer; Ruth Philip; Sonia Gaur; Stephen M Lawrie Journal: Eur Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 5.361
Authors: Catherine Lord; Traolach S Brugha; Tony Charman; James Cusack; Guillaume Dumas; Thomas Frazier; Emily J H Jones; Rebecca M Jones; Andrew Pickles; Matthew W State; Julie Lounds Taylor; Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 52.329