INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the only cure for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), with R0 resection being critical for successful tumor removal. Early detection of residual disease is key for optimal management, but both imaging and current biomarkers are ineffective post-surgery. NETest, a multigene blood biomarker, identifies NETs with >90% accuracy. We hypothesized that surgery would decrease NETest levels and that elevated scores post-surgery would predict recurrence. METHODS: This was a multicenter evaluation of surgically treated primary NETs (n = 153). Blood sampling was performed at day 0 and postoperative day (POD) 30. Follow-up included computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI), and messenger RNA (mRNA) quantification was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; NETest score: 0-100; normal ≤20). Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), as appropriate. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The NET cohort (n = 153) included 57 patients with pancreatic cancer, 62 patients with small bowel cancer, 27 patients with lung cancer, 4 patients with duodenal cancer, and 3 patients with gastric cancer, while the surgical cohort comprised patients with R0 (n = 102) and R1 and R2 (n = 51) resection. The mean follow-up time was 14 months (range 3-68). The NETest was positive in 153/153 (100%) samples preoperatively (mean levels of 68 ± 28). In the R0 cohort, POD30 levels decreased from 62 ± 28 to 22 ± 20 (p < 0.0001), but remained elevated in 30% (31/102) of patients: 28% lung, 29% pancreas, 27% small bowel, and 33% gastric. By 18 months, 25/31 (81%) patients with a POD30 NETest >20 had image-identifiable recurrence. An NETest score of >20 predicted recurrence with 100% sensitivity and correlated with residual disease (Chi-square 17.1, p < 0.0001). AUROC analysis identified an AUC of 0.97 (p < 0.0001) for recurrence-prediction. In the R1 (n = 29) and R2 (n = 22) cohorts, the score decreased (R1: 74 ± 28 to 45 ± 24, p = 0.0012; R2: 72 ± 24 to 60 ± 28, p = non-significant). At POD30, 100% of NETest scores were elevated despite surgery (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The preoperative NETest accurately identified all NETs (100%). All resections decreased NETest levels and a POD30 NETest score >20 predicted radiologically recurrent disease with 94% accuracy and 100% sensitivity. R0 resection appears to be ineffective in approximately 30% of patients. NET mRNA blood levels provide early objective genomic identification of residual disease and may facilitate management.
INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the only cure for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), with R0 resection being critical for successful tumor removal. Early detection of residual disease is key for optimal management, but both imaging and current biomarkers are ineffective post-surgery. NETest, a multigene blood biomarker, identifies NETs with >90% accuracy. We hypothesized that surgery would decrease NETest levels and that elevated scores post-surgery would predict recurrence. METHODS: This was a multicenter evaluation of surgically treated primary NETs (n = 153). Blood sampling was performed at day 0 and postoperative day (POD) 30. Follow-up included computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI), and messenger RNA (mRNA) quantification was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; NETest score: 0-100; normal ≤20). Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), as appropriate. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The NET cohort (n = 153) included 57 patients with pancreatic cancer, 62 patients with small bowel cancer, 27 patients with lung cancer, 4 patients with duodenal cancer, and 3 patients with gastric cancer, while the surgical cohort comprised patients with R0 (n = 102) and R1 and R2 (n = 51) resection. The mean follow-up time was 14 months (range 3-68). The NETest was positive in 153/153 (100%) samples preoperatively (mean levels of 68 ± 28). In the R0 cohort, POD30 levels decreased from 62 ± 28 to 22 ± 20 (p < 0.0001), but remained elevated in 30% (31/102) of patients: 28% lung, 29% pancreas, 27% small bowel, and 33% gastric. By 18 months, 25/31 (81%) patients with a POD30 NETest >20 had image-identifiable recurrence. An NETest score of >20 predicted recurrence with 100% sensitivity and correlated with residual disease (Chi-square 17.1, p < 0.0001). AUROC analysis identified an AUC of 0.97 (p < 0.0001) for recurrence-prediction. In the R1 (n = 29) and R2 (n = 22) cohorts, the score decreased (R1: 74 ± 28 to 45 ± 24, p = 0.0012; R2: 72 ± 24 to 60 ± 28, p = non-significant). At POD30, 100% of NETest scores were elevated despite surgery (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The preoperative NETest accurately identified all NETs (100%). All resections decreased NETest levels and a POD30 NETest score >20 predicted radiologically recurrent disease with 94% accuracy and 100% sensitivity. R0 resection appears to be ineffective in approximately 30% of patients. NET mRNA blood levels provide early objective genomic identification of residual disease and may facilitate management.
Authors: Chan Shen; Yiyi Chu; Daniel M Halperin; Arvind Dasari; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; James C Yao; Ya-Chen Tina Shih Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-06-22
Authors: Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ashley Kieran Clift; Mark Kidd; Lisa Bodei; Christos Toumpanakis; Richard P Baum; Kjell Oberg; Irvin M Modlin; Andrea Frilling Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 5.135
Authors: Kjell Oberg; Eric Krenning; Anders Sundin; Lisa Bodei; Mark Kidd; Margot Tesselaar; Valentina Ambrosini; Richard P Baum; Matthew Kulke; Marianne Pavel; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Ignat Drozdov; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Andrea Frilling; Robert Jensen; Klaus Koopmans; Tiny Korse; Dik Kwekkeboom; Helmut Maecke; Giovanni Paganelli; Ramon Salazar; Stefano Severi; Jonathan Strosberg; Vikas Prasad; Aldo Scarpa; Ashley Grossman; Annemeik Walenkamp; Mauro Cives; Irene Virgolini; Andreas Kjaer; Irvin M Modlin Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 3.335
Authors: Mark J C van Treijen; Catharina M Korse; Rachel S van Leeuwaarde; Lisette J Saveur; Menno R Vriens; Wieke H M Verbeek; Margot E T Tesselaar; Gerlof D Valk Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Alessandra Pulvirenti; Deepthi Rao; Caitlin A Mcintyre; Mithat Gonen; Laura H Tang; David S Klimstra; Martin Fleisher; Lakshmi V Ramanathan; Diane Reidy-Lagunes; Peter J Allen Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: V Andreasi; S Partelli; M F Manzoni; F Muffatti; L Di Filippo; S Crippa; A Corti; M Falconi Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2022-02-05 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Marta Opalińska; Anna Sowa-Staszczak; Helena Olearska; Magdalena Ulatowska-Bialas; Aleksandra Gilis-Januszewska; Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Noémie S Minczeles; Casper H J van Eijck; Marjon J van Gils; Marie-Louise F van Velthuysen; Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum; Richard A Feelders; Wouter W de Herder; Tessa Brabander; Johannes Hofland Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 10.057