Literature DB >> 34008109

Fundoplication is superior to medical therapy for Barrett's esophagus disease regression and progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

H Wilson1, V Mocanu2, W Sun3, J Dang3, U Jogiat3, J Kung4, N Switzer3, C Wong5, S Karmali3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fundoplication and medical management are current mainstays for management of Barrett's esophagus (BE), however our understanding of differences in outcomes between these two treatments is limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions on BE disease regression and progression. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed on February 22, 2021. Inclusion criteria were studies with both medical and surgical management comparators, BE diagnosis prior to treatment, patients aged ≥ 18 years, and studies with greater than five patients. Primary outcomes of interest included evaluating changes in histopathologic BE regression and disease progression between interventions. Meta-analysis was performed using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model (RevMan 5.4.1).
RESULTS: A total of 7231 studies were retrieved after initial search with nine studies (1 randomized trial, 7 prospective cohorts, 1 retrospective cohort) meeting final inclusion criteria. Of included studies, 890 (65%) patients received medical management while 470 (35%) received surgical management. Medical management included proton pump inhibitors (n = 807, 91%; 6 studies), H2-receptor blockers (n = 40, 4% patients; 3 studies), and combination therapy (n = 43, 5%; 1 study). Nissen fundoplication was the most commonly performed type of fundoplication (n = 265, 93%). Median length of follow-up ranged from 1.5-7 years. Meta-analysis revealed that fundoplication was associated with improved histopathologic regression of metaplasia/low-grade dysplasia (OR 4.38; 95% CI 2.28-8.42; p < 0.00001) and disease progression to dysplasia/adenocarcinoma (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.96; p = 0.04) compared to medical therapy.
CONCLUSION: Fundoplication is superior to medical therapy with regards to improved odds of histopathologic BE disease regression and disease progression. Additional randomized trials which directly compare medical management and surgical intervention are required to delineate the optimal delivery and timing of these interventions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s esophagus; Dysplasia; Fundoplication; Proton pump inhibitors

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34008109     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08543-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

Review 1.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

Review 2.  Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review.

Authors:  John Maret-Ouda; Sheraz R Markar; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas M Runge; Julian A Abrams; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  Barrett esophagus: risk factors for progression to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan Oberg; Jörgen Wenner; Jan Johansson; Bruno Walther; Roger Willén
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Frederik Hvid-Jensen; Lars Pedersen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Peter Funch-Jensen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Barrett's oesophagus: effect of antireflux surgery on symptom control and development of complications.

Authors:  S E Attwood; A P Barlow; T L Norris; A Watson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Standardization of surgical technique in antireflux surgery: the LOTUS Trial experience.

Authors:  Stephen E A Attwood; Lars Lundell; Christian Ell; Jean-Paul Galmiche; Jan Hatlebakk; Roberto Fiocca; Tore Lind; Stefan Eklund; Ola Junghard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The Influence of Antireflux Surgery on Esophageal Cancer Risk in England: National Population-based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Chanpreet Arhi; Astrid Leusink; Alberto Vidal-Diez; Alan Karthikesalingam; Ara Darzi; Jesper Lagergren; George B Hanna
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Antireflux Surgery and Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Maret-Ouda; Peter Konings; Jesper Lagergren; Nele Brusselaers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  The Role of Tourism and Recreation in the Spread of Non-Native Species: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lucy G Anderson; Steve Rocliffe; Neal R Haddaway; Alison M Dunn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: ARE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? SHOULD IT BE USED CONJOINED WITH ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY FOR BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS?

Authors:  Shiwei Han; Donald E Low
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-06-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.