Literature DB >> 34007536

A Practice Based Chronic Pain Management Registry (CPMR): Structure and Content of Proposed Patient and Patient/Provider Platforms.

Paul C Langley1.   

Abstract

Previous commentaries in the Formulary Evaluation section of INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy have pointed to the difficulties of establishing the credibility of trial-based and modeled claims for therapy interventions. Claims for interventions in the management of chronic pain are no exception. To meet this challenge, the Chronic Pain Management Registry (CPMR) has been designed to provide an evidence base for physician practices and health care decision makers to evaluate the impact of pain management interventions. The purpose of this commentary is to detail the development, structure and content of the CPMR in two versions: (i) a patient response version and (ii) a combined patient/provider response version. The CPMR has a potentially critical role to play in providing a framework for the effective auditing of practice compliance in the prescribing and monitoring of opioids in the management of chronic pain. The CPMR tracks, with on-line input from the patient and the treating physician, the process and outcomes of therapy interventions. These reports cover the overall pain experience of patients as well as pain intensity and functional status by eleven specific pain locations, covering both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Prior to each practice visit patients complete reports which are entered to the CPMR with a summary transmitted to the physician practice. Over time, these reports track the cumulative response to therapy as well as the perception of the patients as to whether or not the therapy has led to any substantive improvement in activity limitations, symptoms and quality of life. A particular focus of the CPMR is on monitoring and evaluating the experience with, and impact of opioid medications, to include the effectiveness of opioid formulations on reducing pain intensity and improving functional status, including an intensive assessment of the potential for and experience of opioid substance abuse for individual patients. The CPMR can also support monthly reports to the practice to summarize patient throughput, the response to care by target pain patients and profiles of opioid use and abuse. The CPMR can be customized to meet the needs of individual practices. © Individual authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPMR; Chronic Pain Management Registry; claims credibility; medication abuse; opioid evaluation; pain management

Year:  2019        PMID: 34007536      PMCID: PMC7643708          DOI: 10.24926/iip.v10i1.1628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Pharm        ISSN: 2155-0417


  48 in total

Review 1.  Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mark P Jensen; Nathaniel P Katz; Robert D Kerns; Gerold Stucki; Robert R Allen; Nicholas Bellamy; Daniel B Carr; Julie Chandler; Penney Cowan; Raymond Dionne; Bradley S Galer; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Susan Martin; Cynthia G McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Wendye Robbins; James P Robinson; Margaret Rothman; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Wendy Stein; Jane Tollett; Joachim Wernicke; James Witter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Therapeutic Effectiveness of Sacroiliac Joint Interventions.

Authors:  Thomas T Simopoulos; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Sanjeeva Gupta; Steve M Aydin; Chong Hwan Kim; Daneshvari Solanki; Devi E Nampiaparampil; Vijay Singh; Peter S Staats; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Kamran Golmohammadi; Renea V Johnston; Richard J Owen; Joanne Homik; Allyson Jones; Sukhvinder S Dhillon; David F Kallmes; Robert G W Lambert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-30

4.  The measurement of fatigue: a new instrument.

Authors:  J E Schwartz; L Jandorf; L B Krupp
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

Authors:  Robert L Spitzer; Kurt Kroenke; Janet B W Williams; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-22

7.  Grading the severity of chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael Von Korff; Johan Ormel; Francis J Keefe; Samuel F Dworkin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Development of a self-report screening instrument for assessing potential opioid medication misuse in chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Laura L Adams; Robert J Gatchel; Richard C Robinson; Peter Polatin; Noor Gajraj; Martin Deschner; Carl Noe
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects.

Authors:  Nicholas J Greco; Allen F Anderson; Barton J Mann; Brian J Cole; Jack Farr; Carl W Nissen; James J Irrgang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation With Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain From Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Tim Davis; Eric Loudermilk; Michael DePalma; Corey Hunter; David Lindley; Nilesh Patel; Daniel Choi; Marc Soloman; Anita Gupta; Mehul Desai; Asokumar Buvanendran; Leonardo Kapural
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.