| Literature DB >> 34007492 |
Antoine Berberi1, Georges Aoun2, Emile Khalaf3, Georges Aad2.
Abstract
Fibrous dysplasia is a developmental disorder of the bone that originates from a genetic defect disturbing the osteogenesis leading to the replacement of normal bone with the excess proliferation of fibrous tissue. It can be associated with hyperpigmentation of the skin and endocrine disorders. Fibrous dysplasia can manifest in a monostotic form affecting one bone or in a polyostotic form involving several bones. Approximately 30% of monostotic forms are observed in the maxilla and the mandible. It frequently appears in the posterior region and is usually unilateral. It is found in teenagers and could become static after adulthood. Patients can present with swelling, facial asymmetry, pain, or numbness on the affected side. Treatment modalities vary between conservative surgical treatment, radical surgical approach, and medical treatment based on bisphosphonates. Here, we present a case of a monostotic form of fibrous dysplasia affecting the posterior left region of the mandible in a 9-year-old male complaining of gradually increased swelling on the left mandibular side of one-year duration. The diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia is established based on clinical, radiographical, and histopathological features. Conservative surgery is implemented with surgical shaving and reencountering of the bone excess to reduce the facial asymmetry. Recurrence is reported 10 years later and is also treated with a localized osteoplasty and remodeling of the bone contours. Five years later, the lesion remains stable. In conclusion, a conservative approach should be adopted as the first line of treatment for young patients suffering from monostotic fibrous dysplasia.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34007492 PMCID: PMC8110395 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9963478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Dent
Figure 1(a) Facial asymmetry on the left side. (b) Swelling in the buccal side of the mandible. (c) Panoramic X-ray showing the radiopaque image englobing the dental germ of the permanent second premolar. (d) The course of the mandibular canal displaced buccally is shown on the axial image of the CBCT. (e) Axial image of the CBCT showing the expansion of the body of the mandible. (f) Para-axial images of the CBCT revealed the ossification of the lesion and the positions of the retained dental germ and the mandibular canal.
Figure 2(a) Clinical view of the excess bone. (b) The excised bone with the dental germ. (c) HE × 10 showing irregularly shaped trabeculae of immature bone within proliferating fibroblastic tissue (B: bone; FT: fibrous tissue). (d) One-week panoramic radiograph. (e) Five-year panoramic radiograph.
Figure 3(a) Facial asymmetry at 10 years. (b) Clinical view of the intraoral swelling. (c) Panoramic X-ray at 10 years. (d) Axial image of a CBCT showing the expansion of the lesion to the midline and discontinuity of the buccal cortex. (e) 3D reconstruction showed an increase in the volume of the left hemimandible.
Figure 4(a) Intraoperative view for the surgical approach. (b) The excised bone with respect to the mental foramen. (c) Healing of the soft tissue one month later. (d) Facial stability after 5 years following the second surgery and 15 years after the first surgery. (e) Clinical appearance of the soft healing after 15 years of the first surgery. (f) Panoramic X-ray after 15 years of the first surgery.