Literature DB >> 34006900

Differentiation of two swim bladdered fish species using next generation wideband hydroacoustics.

Sarah M Gugele1,2, Marcus Widmer3, Jan Baer4, J Tyrell DeWeber1, Helge Balk3, Alexander Brinker1,2.   

Abstract

Monitoring fish populations in large, deep water bodies by conventional capture methodologies requires intensive fishing effort and often causes mass mortality of fish. Thus, it can be difficult to collect sufficient data using capture methods for understanding fine scale community dynamics associated with issues such as climate change or species invasion. Hydroacoustic monitoring is an alternative, less invasive technology that can collect higher resolution data over large temporal and spatial scales. Monitoring multiple species with hydroacoustics, however, usually requires conventional sampling to provide species level information. The ability to identify the species identity of similar-sized individuals using only hydroacoustic data would greatly expand monitoring capabilities and further reduce the need for conventional sampling. In this study, wideband hydroacoustic technology was used in a mesocosm experiment to differentiate between free swimming, similar-sized individuals of two swim-bladdered species: whitefish (Coregonus wartmanni) and stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Individual targets were identified in echograms and variation in wideband acoustic responses among individuals, across different orientations, and between species was quantified and visually examined. Random forest classification was then used to classify individual targets of known species identity, and had an accuracy of 73.4% for the testing dataset. The results show that species can be identified with reasonable accuracy using wideband hydroacoustics. It is expected that further mesocosm and field studies will help determine capabilities and limitations for classifying additional species and monitoring fish communities. Hydroacoustic species differentiation may offer novel possibilities for fisheries managers and scientists, marking the next crucial step in non-invasive fish monitoring.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34006900     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89941-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  4 in total

1.  Random forests for classification in ecology.

Authors:  D Richard Cutler; Thomas C Edwards; Karen H Beard; Adele Cutler; Kyle T Hess; Jacob Gibson; Joshua J Lawler
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Declining coastal piscivore populations in the Baltic Sea: Where and when do sticklebacks matter?

Authors:  Pär Byström; Ulf Bergström; Alexander Hjälten; Sofie Ståhl; David Jonsson; Jens Olsson
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Real-time distribution of pelagic fish: combining hydroacoustics, GIS and spatial modelling at a fine spatial scale.

Authors:  Milan Muška; Michal Tušer; Jaroslava Frouzová; Tomáš Mrkvička; Daniel Ricard; Jaromír Seďa; Federico Morelli; Jan Kubečka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Admixture between old lineages facilitated contemporary ecological speciation in Lake Constance stickleback.

Authors:  David A Marques; Kay Lucek; Vitor C Sousa; Laurent Excoffier; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.