Literature DB >> 34006896

Factors affecting in-stent restenosis after angioplasty with the Enterprise stent for intracranial atherosclerotic diseases.

Kun Zhang1, Tian-Xiao Li1, Zi-Liang Wang2, Bu-Lang Gao1, Jian-Jun Gu1, Hui-Li Gao1, Yong-Feng Wang1, Jin-Chao Xia1.   

Abstract

This study investigated factors affecting the safety and in-stent restenosis after intracranial stent angioplasty using the Enterprise stent for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Between January 2017 and March 2019, patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis treated with Enterprise stent angioplasty were enrolled, including 400 patients in the modeling group and 89 patients in the validation group. The clinical factors affecting in-stent restenosis after Enterprise stent angioplasty in the modeling group were analyzed, and a logistic regression model of these factors was established and validated in the validation group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were analyzed. In the modeling group with 400 patients, there were 410 lesions, including 360 stenotic lesions and 50 occluded lesions, with 176 (42.9%) lesions in the anterior circulation and 234 (57.1%) in the posterior circulation. Successful stenting was performed in 398 patients (99.5%). Stenosis was significantly (P < 0.05) improved after stenting compared with before stenting (27.7% ± 2.9% vs. 77.9% ± 8.0%). Periprocedural complications included ischemic stroke (3.25%), hemorrhagic stroke (0.75%), and death (0.50%), with a total periprocedural complication rate of 4.0%. The first follow-up angiography was performed in 348 (87.0%) patients with 359 lesions 3.5-14 months (mean 5.7 months) after stenting. In-stent restenosis occurred in 62 (17.3%) lesions, while the other 295 (82.7%) had no restenosis. Lesion location, calcification degree, balloon expansion pressure, residual stenosis, intraprocedural dissection, and cerebral blood flow TICI grade were significant (P < 0.05) risk factors for in-stent restenosis. The in-stent restenosis prediction model was established as follows: P = 1/[1 + e-(-6.070-1.391 location + 2.745 calcification + 4.117 balloon inflation pressure + 2.195 intraprocedural dissection + 1.163 residual stenosis + 1.174 flow TC grade)]. In the validation group, the AUC in the ROC curve analysis was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.836-0.969), and when the cutoff value was 0.50, the sensitivity and specificity of this model were shown to be 76.92% and 80.26%, respectively, in predicting in-stent restenosis at angiographic follow-up, with a total coincidence rate of 79.78%. In conclusion, in-stent restenosis after intracranial Enterprise stenting is affected by stenosis location, calcification, balloon inflation pressure, intraprocedural arterial dissection, residual stenosis, and cerebral flow grade, and establishment of a logistic model with these factors can effectively predict in-stent restenosis.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34006896     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89670-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  24 in total

1.  Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management.

Authors:  Elad I Levy; Aquilla S Turk; Felipe C Albuquerque; David B Niemann; Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz; Lee Pride; Phil Purdy; Babu Welch; Henry Woo; Peter A Rasmussen; L Nelson Hopkins; Thomas J Masaryk; Cameron G McDougall; David J Fiorella
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Long-term Outcome of Angioplasty Using a Wingspan Stent, Post-Stent Balloon Dilation and Aggressive Restenosis Management for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

Authors:  Seong-Cheol Park; Su Hee Cho; Moon-Kyu Kim; Ji-Eun Kim; Woo-Young Jang; Moon-Kyu Lee; Kwang-Deog Jo; Seung-Hoon You
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Chinese-white differences in the distribution of occlusive cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  E Feldmann; N Daneault; E Kwan; K J Ho; M S Pessin; P Langenberg; L R Caplan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses with balloon dilatation and self-expanding stent deployment (WingSpan).

Authors:  H Henkes; E Miloslavski; S Lowens; J Reinartz; T Liebig; D Kühne
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Colin P Derdeyn; Tanya N Turan; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; Michel T Torbey; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Influence of patient age and stenosis location on wingspan in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  A S Turk; E I Levy; F C Albuquerque; G L Pride; H Woo; B G Welch; D B Niemann; P D Purdy; B Aagaard-Kienitz; P A Rasmussen; L N Hopkins; T J Masaryk; C G McDougall; D Fiorella
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study.

Authors:  Arani Bose; Marius Hartmann; Hans Henkes; Hon Man Liu; Michael M H Teng; Istvan Szikora; Ansgar Berlis; Jurgen Reul; Simon C H Yu; Michael Forsting; Matt Lui; Winston Lim; Siu Po Sit
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Colin P Derdeyn; Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; David Fiorella; Tanya N Turan; L Scott Janis; Jean Montgomery; Azhar Nizam; Bethany F Lane; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; John R Lynch; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Intracranial atherosclerotic disease: an update.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Edward Feldmann; Camilo R Gomez; S Claiborne Johnston; Scott E Kasner; Donald C Quick; Peter A Rasmussen; M Fareed K Suri; Robert A Taylor; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Enterprise stent for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: an initial experience of 44 patients.

Authors:  Zhengzhe Feng; Guoli Duan; Ping Zhang; Lei Chen; Yi Xu; Bo Hong; Wenyuan Zhao; Jianmin Liu; Qinghai Huang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.474

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hemodynamic and Geometric Risk Factors for In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.

Authors:  Xiaowen Song; Hancheng Qiu; Shuo Wang; Yong Cao; Jizong Zhao
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.310

2.  Efficacy and Prediction Model Construction of Drug-Coated Balloon Combined with Cutting Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis.

Authors:  Haokun Wu; Tianhao Yu; Ting Fan; Wenjun Liao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.