Literature DB >> 34006662

A Generic, Scalable, and Rapid Time-Resolved Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Assay for Antigen Detection-SARS-CoV-2 as a Proof of Concept.

Juuso Rusanen1, Lauri Kareinen1,2, Leonora Szirovicza1, Hasan Uğurlu1, Lev Levanov1, Anu Jääskeläinen3,4, Maarit Ahava3,4, Satu Kurkela3,4, Kalle Saksela1, Klaus Hedman1,3,4, Olli Vapalahti1,2,3,4, Jussi Hepojoki5,6.   

Abstract

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has seen an unprecedented increase in the demand for rapid and reliable diagnostic tools, leaving many laboratories scrambling for resources. We present a fast and simple assay principle for antigen detection and demonstrate its functionality by detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigens in nasopharyngeal swabs. The method is based on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (NP) and S protein (SP) via time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) with donor- and acceptor-labeled polyclonal anti-NP and -SP antibodies. Using recombinant proteins and cell culture-grown SARS-CoV-2, the limits of detection were established as 25 pg of NP or 20 infectious units (IU) and 875 pg of SP or 625 IU. Testing reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)-positive (n = 48, with cycle threshold [CT ] values from 11 to 30) or -negative (n = 96) nasopharyngeal swabs demonstrated that the assay yielded positive results for all samples with CT values of <25 and for a single RT-PCR-negative sample. Virus isolation from the RT-PCR-positive nasopharyngeal swabs showed a strong association between the presence of infectious virus and a positive antigen test result. The NP-based assay showed 97.4% (37/38) sensitivity and 100% (10/10) specificity in comparison with virus isolation and 77.1% (37/48) sensitivity and 99.0% (95/96) specificity in comparison with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. The assay is performed in a buffer that neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, and the assay is relatively simple to set up as an "in-house" test. Here, SARS-CoV-2 served as the model pathogen, but the assay principle is applicable to other viral infections, and the test format could easily be adapted to high-throughput testing.IMPORTANCE PCR is currently the gold standard for the diagnosis of many acute infections. While PCR and its variants are highly sensitive and specific, the time from sampling to results is measured in hours at best. Antigen tests directly detect parts of the infectious agent, which may enable faster diagnosis but often at lower sensitivity and specificity. Here, we describe a technique for rapid antigen detection and demonstrate the test format's potential using SARS-CoV-2 as the model pathogen. The 10-min test, performed in a buffer that readily inactivates SARS-CoV-2, from nasopharyngeal samples identified 97.4% (37/38) of the samples from which we could isolate the virus. This suggests that the test performs well in identifying patients potentially shedding the virus. Although SARS-CoV-2 served as the model pathogen to demonstrate proof of concept, the test principle itself would be applicable to a wide variety of infectious and perhaps also noninfectious diseases.
Copyright © 2021 Rusanen et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; TR-FRET; antigen test; mix and read; rapid diagnostic test

Year:  2021        PMID: 34006662     DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00902-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mBio            Impact factor:   7.867


  12 in total

Review 1.  Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Pawana Sharma; Sarah Berhane; Susanna S van Wyk; Nicholas Nyaaba; Julie Domen; Melissa Taylor; Jane Cunningham; Clare Davenport; Sabine Dittrich; Devy Emperador; Lotty Hooft; Mariska Mg Leeflang; Matthew Df McInnes; René Spijker; Jan Y Verbakel; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Ann Van den Bruel; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-22

2.  Preparation of the luciferase-labeled antibody for improving the detection sensitivity of viral antigen.

Authors:  Ying Tang; Yuchang Li; Sen Zhang; Jing Li; Yi Hu; Wenguang Yang; Yuehong Chen; Chengfeng Qin; Tao Jiang; Xiaoping Kang
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.913

3.  Common Laboratory Mice Are Susceptible to Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Beta Variant.

Authors:  Ravi Kant; Lauri Kareinen; Teemu Smura; Tobias L Freitag; Sawan Kumar Jha; Kari Alitalo; Seppo Meri; Tarja Sironen; Kalle Saksela; Tomas Strandin; Anja Kipar; Olli Vapalahti
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Persistence of neutralizing antibodies a year after SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans.

Authors:  Anu Haveri; Nina Ekström; Anna Solastie; Camilla Virta; Pamela Österlund; Elina Isosaari; Hanna Nohynek; Arto A Palmu; Merit Melin
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 6.688

5.  Neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant after third mRNA vaccination in health care workers and elderly subjects.

Authors:  Anu Haveri; Anna Solastie; Nina Ekström; Pamela Österlund; Hanna Nohynek; Tuomo Nieminen; Arto A Palmu; Merit Melin
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.688

6.  Vaccine-Induced Antibody Responses against SARS-CoV-2 Variants-Of-Concern Six Months after the BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.

Authors:  Anu Kantele; Ilkka Julkunen; Johanna Lempainen; Laura Kakkola; Pinja Jalkanen; Pekka Kolehmainen; Anu Haveri; Moona Huttunen; Larissa Laine; Pamela Österlund; Paula A Tähtinen; Lauri Ivaska; Sari Maljanen; Arttu Reinholm; Milja Belik; Teemu Smura; Hanni K Häkkinen; Eeva Ortamo
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-03-09

7.  Comparative analysis of COVID-19 vaccine responses and third booster dose-induced neutralizing antibodies against Delta and Omicron variants.

Authors:  Anu Kantele; Johanna Lempainen; Laura Kakkola; Pekka Kolehmainen; Ilkka Julkunen; Milja Belik; Pinja Jalkanen; Rickard Lundberg; Arttu Reinholm; Larissa Laine; Elina Väisänen; Marika Skön; Paula A Tähtinen; Lauri Ivaska; Sari H Pakkanen; Hanni K Häkkinen; Eeva Ortamo; Arja Pasternack; Mikael A Ritvos; Rauno A Naves; Simo Miettinen; Tarja Sironen; Olli Vapalahti; Olli Ritvos; Pamela Österlund
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Kinetics of Neutralizing Antibodies of COVID-19 Patients Tested Using Clinical D614G, B.1.1.7, and B 1.351 Isolates in Microneutralization Assays.

Authors:  Jenni Virtanen; Ruut Uusitalo; Essi M Korhonen; Kirsi Aaltonen; Teemu Smura; Suvi Kuivanen; Sari H Pakkanen; Sointu Mero; Anu Patjas; Marianna Riekkinen; Anu Kantele; Visa Nurmi; Klaus Hedman; Jussi Hepojoki; Tarja Sironen; Eili Huhtamo; Olli Vapalahti
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Performance of the Sofia SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test as frontline test in a university hospital, Germany.

Authors:  Linus Bornemann; Theo Dähne; Alexey Fomenko; Olaf Kaup; Johannes Kleideiter; Robert Kulis-Horn; Bertram Ruprecht; Michael Wehmeier; Marcus Panning
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  COVID-19 mRNA vaccine induced antibody responses against three SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Authors:  Pinja Jalkanen; Pekka Kolehmainen; Hanni K Häkkinen; Moona Huttunen; Paula A Tähtinen; Rickard Lundberg; Sari Maljanen; Arttu Reinholm; Sisko Tauriainen; Sari H Pakkanen; Iris Levonen; Arttu Nousiainen; Taru Miller; Hanna Välimaa; Lauri Ivaska; Arja Pasternack; Rauno Naves; Olli Ritvos; Pamela Österlund; Suvi Kuivanen; Teemu Smura; Jussi Hepojoki; Olli Vapalahti; Johanna Lempainen; Laura Kakkola; Anu Kantele; Ilkka Julkunen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.