Simon Chowdhury1, Jeffery R Infante2, Robert Hawkins3, Martin H Voss4, Rodolfo Perini5, Tobias Arkenau6, Mark Voskoboynik7, Paola Aimone8, Isabelle Naeije8, Albert Reising9, David F McDermott10. 1. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom; Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 2. Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN. 3. Institute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom. 4. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 5. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ. 6. Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Cancer Institute, University College, London, United Kingdom. 7. Alfred Health Melbourne, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. 9. Novartis Oncology, East Hanover, NJ. 10. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address: dmcdermo@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study assessed whether antiangiogenic treatment may potentiate immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, two-part, multicenter study involving treatment-naïve patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Part 1 consisted of a phase I dose escalation and expansion of pazopanib plus pembrolizumab (combination therapy). Cohorts A and B received pazopanib in combination with pembrolizumab, whereas Cohort C received pazopanib monotherapy for 9 weeks before receiving the combination therapy. Part 2 was planned as a randomized three-arm study but was not conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 42 patients were enrolled (10 each in Cohorts A and B, 22 in Cohort C). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached and the recommended phase II dose was not declared, as Cohort C was closed early because of safety concerns. The overall response rates were 60% and 20% in Cohorts A and B, respectively. In Cohort C, the overall response rates were 33%, 25%, and 0% in the combination therapy, pembrolizumab monotherapy, and pazopanib monotherapy groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival rates were 21.95 months and 41.40 months in Cohorts A and B, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 90% of patients in Cohorts A and B. In Cohort C, the frequencies of grade 3 or 4 AEs, serious adverse events, and AEs leading to dose reduction were typically high in the combination therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite preliminary signs of efficacy, significant hepatotoxicity was observed in Cohorts A and B. The sequential schedule of pazopanib followed by pazopanib plus pembrolizumab showed reduced hepatotoxicity; however, other safety issues emerged with this approach.
BACKGROUND: This study assessed whether antiangiogenic treatment may potentiate immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, two-part, multicenter study involving treatment-naïve patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Part 1 consisted of a phase I dose escalation and expansion of pazopanib plus pembrolizumab (combination therapy). Cohorts A and B received pazopanib in combination with pembrolizumab, whereas Cohort C received pazopanib monotherapy for 9 weeks before receiving the combination therapy. Part 2 was planned as a randomized three-arm study but was not conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 42 patients were enrolled (10 each in Cohorts A and B, 22 in Cohort C). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached and the recommended phase II dose was not declared, as Cohort C was closed early because of safety concerns. The overall response rates were 60% and 20% in Cohorts A and B, respectively. In Cohort C, the overall response rates were 33%, 25%, and 0% in the combination therapy, pembrolizumab monotherapy, and pazopanib monotherapy groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival rates were 21.95 months and 41.40 months in Cohorts A and B, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 90% of patients in Cohorts A and B. In Cohort C, the frequencies of grade 3 or 4 AEs, serious adverse events, and AEs leading to dose reduction were typically high in the combination therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite preliminary signs of efficacy, significant hepatotoxicity was observed in Cohorts A and B. The sequential schedule of pazopanib followed by pazopanib plus pembrolizumab showed reduced hepatotoxicity; however, other safety issues emerged with this approach.
Authors: Thomas Powles; Elizabeth R Plimack; Denis Soulières; Tom Waddell; Viktor Stus; Rustem Gafanov; Dmitry Nosov; Frédéric Pouliot; Bohuslav Melichar; Ihor Vynnychenko; Sergio J Azevedo; Delphine Borchiellini; Raymond S McDermott; Jens Bedke; Satoshi Tamada; Lina Yin; Mei Chen; L Rhoda Molife; Michael B Atkins; Brian I Rini Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Brian I Rini; David F McDermott; Bruce G Redman; Timothy M Kuzel; Michael R Harrison; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Harry A Drabkin; Saby George; Theodore F Logan; Kim A Margolin; Elizabeth R Plimack; Alexandre M Lambert; Ian M Waxman; Hans J Hammers Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ana Ezponda; Ignacio González De La Huebra; Marta Calvo; Miguel Ángel Idoate; Isabel Vivas Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Laurence Albiges; André P Fay; Wanling Xie; Katherine Krajewski; David F McDermott; Daniel Y C Heng; Charles Dariane; Guillermo DeVelasco; Renee Lester; Bernard Escudier; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Yuanquan Yang; Sarah P Psutka; Anish B Parikh; Mingjia Li; Katharine Collier; Abdul Miah; Sherry V Mori; Megan Hinkley; Scott S Tykodi; Evan Hall; John A Thompson; Ming Yin Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 4.711
Authors: Michael B Atkins; Hamzah Abu-Sbeih; Paolo A Ascierto; Michael R Bishop; Daniel S Chen; Madhav Dhodapkar; Leisha A Emens; Marc S Ernstoff; Robert L Ferris; Tim F Greten; James L Gulley; Roy S Herbst; Rachel W Humphrey; James Larkin; Kim A Margolin; Luca Mazzarella; Suresh S Ramalingam; Meredith M Regan; Brian I Rini; Mario Sznol Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 12.469