Literature DB >> 34006253

Single-port thoracoscopic anatomic resection for chronic inflammatory lung disease.

Chen-Yu Wu1, Ying-Yuan Chen1,2, Chao-Chun Chang1, Yi-Ting Yen1, Wu-Wei Lai1, Wei-Li Huang3,4, Yau-Lin Tseng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is challenging to proceed thoracoscopic anatomic resection when encountering severe pleural adhesion or calcified peribronchial lymphadenopathy. Compared with multiple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (MP-VATS), how to overcome these challenges in single-port (SP-) VATS is still an intractable problem. In the present study, we reported the surgical results of chronic inflammatory lung disease and shared some useful SP-VATS techniques.
METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the surgical results of chronic inflammatory lung disease, primarily bronchiectasis, and mycobacterial infection, at our institution between 2010 and 2018. The patients who underwent SP-VATS anatomic resection were compared with those who underwent MP-VATS procedures. We analyzed the baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes, and illustrated four special techniques depending on the situation: flexible hook electrocautery, hilum-first technique, application of Satinsky vascular clamp, and staged closure of bronchial stump method.
RESULTS: We classified 170 consecutive patients undergoing thoracoscopic anatomic resection into SP and MP groups, which had significant between-group differences in operation time and overall complication rate (P = 0.037 and 0.018, respectively). Compared to the MP-VATS group, the operation time of SP-VATS was shorter, and the conversion rate of SP-VATS was relatively lower (3.1% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.135). The most common complication was prolonged air leakage (SP-VATS, 10.8%; MP-VATS, 2.9%, P = 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: For chronic inflammatory lung disease, certain surgical techniques render SP-VATS anatomic resection feasible and safe with a lower conversion rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomic resection; Bronchiectasis; Inflammatory lung disease; Mycobacterial infection; Single-port; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34006253     DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01252-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Surg        ISSN: 1471-2482            Impact factor:   2.102


  4 in total

1.  How to deal with benign hilar or interlobar lymphadenopathy during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy-firing the bronchus and pulmonary artery together.

Authors:  Chengwu Liu; Lin Ma; Qiang Pu; Hu Liao; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-02-23

Review 2.  Intraoperative bleeding control by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery†.

Authors:  Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Tomaz Stupnik; Ricardo Fernandez; Mercedes de la Torre; Carlos Velasco; Yang Yang; Wentao Lee; Gening Jiang
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Surgical treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis: is video-assisted thoracic surgery "better" than thoracotomy?

Authors:  Yi Han; Dezhi Zhen; Zhidong Liu; Shaofa Xu; Shuku Liu; Ming Qin; Shijie Zhou; Daping Yu; Xiaoyun Song; Yunsong Li; Ning Xiao; Chongyu Su; Kang Shi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Uniportal thoracoscopic treatment in bronchiectasis patients: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Ilhan Ocakcioglu
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.195

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.