Literature DB >> 3400597

Estimating left ventricular ejection fraction after myocardial infarction by various clinical parameters.

R F McNamara1, E Carleen, A J Moss.   

Abstract

The clinical predictors of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) were determined in 760 survivors of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). LVEF was dichotomized at less than or equal to 0.40 (n = 269) and greater than 0.04 (n = 491). Logistic regression showed that 4 of 20 preselected, clinically meaningful variables were strong and independent (p less than 0.001) predictors of LVEF less than or equal to 0.40. Independent variables together with their odds ratio (odds of having a LVEF less than or equal to 0.40 with factor present to odds with factor absent) in order of decreasing importance were: anterior AMI (4.7), congestion on chest x-ray (2.9), previous AMI (2.3) and creatine kinase greater than 1,000 U (2.1). There was a stepwise decrease in LVEF and an increase in the proportion of patients with a low LVEF for each additional clinical variable. A general estimate of LVEF was made by simply considering the total number of clinical factors present. The presence of 0 or 1 clinical variable (n = 466) predicted a high LVEF (greater than 0.40) with an accuracy of 80%. Two or more variables (n = 294) predicted a low LVEF (less than or equal to 0.40) with an accuracy of 60%. The overall predictive accuracy was 72%. Clinically significant major misclassifications were rare (less than 10%). Readily obtainable clinical variables provide the clinician with a useful bedside method of estimating LVEF after AMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3400597     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90210-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Diagnosis of heart failure.

Authors:  J Cleland
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Risk assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in primary care: cross sectional study evaluating a range of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  O W Nielsen; J F Hansen; J Hilden; C T Larsen; J Svanegaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-22

3.  Left ventricular atrioventricular plane displacement: an echocardiographic technique for rapid assessment of prognosis in heart failure.

Authors:  R Willenheimer; C Cline; L Erhardt; B Israelsson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Diagnosis of patients with chronic heart failure in primary care: usefulness of history, examination, and investigations.

Authors:  K Khunti; R Baker; G Grimshaw
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  How well can the chest radiograph diagnose left ventricular dysfunction?

Authors:  R G Badgett; C D Mulrow; P M Otto; G Ramírez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jong-Wook Ban; Emma Wallace; Richard Stevens; Rafael Perera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.