Literature DB >> 34005969

Arnold tongues in oscillator systems with nonuniform spatial driving.

Alexander Golden1,2, Allyson E Sgro2,3, Pankaj Mehta1,2.   

Abstract

Nonlinear oscillator systems are ubiquitous in biology and physics, and their control is a practical problem in many experimental systems. Here we study this problem in the context of the two models of spatially coupled oscillators: the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGLE) and a generalization of the CGLE in which oscillators are coupled through an external medium (emCGLE). We focus on external control drives that vary in both space and time. We find that the spatial distribution of the drive signal controls the frequency ranges over which oscillators synchronize to the drive and that boundary conditions strongly influence synchronization to external drives for the CGLE. Our calculations also show that the emCGLE has a low density regime in which a broad range of frequencies can be synchronized for low drive amplitudes. We study the bifurcation structure of these models and find that they are very similar to results for the driven Kuramoto model, a system with no spatial structure. We conclude by discussing qualitative implications of our results for controlling coupled oscillator systems such as the social amoebae Dictyostelium and populations of Belousov Zhabotinsky (BZ) catalytic particles using spatially structured external drives.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34005969      PMCID: PMC9004068          DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.042211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E        ISSN: 2470-0045            Impact factor:   2.529


  16 in total

1.  Model for the transition in bluff body wakes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-05-16       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Dynamical quorum sensing: Population density encoded in cellular dynamics.

Authors:  Silvia De Monte; Francesco d'Ovidio; Sune Danø; Preben Graae Sørensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dynamical quorum sensing and synchronization in large populations of chemical oscillators.

Authors:  Annette F Taylor; Mark R Tinsley; Fang Wang; Zhaoyang Huang; Kenneth Showalter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Diffusively coupled chemical oscillators in a microfluidic assembly.

Authors:  Masahiro Toiya; Vladimir K Vanag; Irving R Epstein
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Kuramoto model with coupling through an external medium.

Authors:  David J Schwab; Gabriel G Plunk; Pankaj Mehta
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.642

6.  Coupling between distant biofilms and emergence of nutrient time-sharing.

Authors:  Jintao Liu; Rosa Martinez-Corral; Arthur Prindle; Dong-Yeon D Lee; Joseph Larkin; Marçal Gabalda-Sagarra; Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo; Gürol M Süel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae.

Authors:  Thomas Gregor; Koichi Fujimoto; Noritaka Masaki; Satoshi Sawai
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Oscillatory signaling and network responses during the development of Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Vanessa C McMains; Xin-Hua Liao; Alan R Kimmel
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2008-05-04       Impact factor: 10.895

9.  From intracellular signaling to population oscillations: bridging size- and time-scales in collective behavior.

Authors:  Allyson E Sgro; David J Schwab; Javad Noorbakhsh; Troy Mestler; Pankaj Mehta; Thomas Gregor
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Metabolic co-dependence gives rise to collective oscillations within biofilms.

Authors:  Jintao Liu; Arthur Prindle; Jacqueline Humphries; Marçal Gabalda-Sagarra; Munehiro Asally; Dong-yeon D Lee; San Ly; Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo; Gürol M Süel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.