Trends in malaria prevalence and risk factors associated with the disease in Nkongho-mbeng; a typical rural setting in the equatorial rainforest of the South West Region of Cameroon.

Globally, malaria in recent years has witnessed a decline in the number of cases and death, though the most recent world malaria report shows a slight decrease in the number of cases in 2018 compared to 2017 and, increase in 2017 compared to 2016. Africa remains the region with the greatest burden of the disease. Cameroon is among the countries with a very high burden of malaria, with the coastal and forest regions carrying the highest burden of the disease. Nkongho-mbeng is a typical rural setting in the equatorial rain forest region of Cameroon, with no existing knowledge of the epidemiology of malaria in this locality. This study aimed at determining the current status of malaria epidemiology in Nkongho-mbeng. A cross-sectional survey was conducted, during which blood samples were collected from 500 participants and examined by microscopy. Risk factors such as, age, sex, duration of stay in the locality, housing type, environmental sanitation and intervention strategies including use of, LLINs and drugs were investigated. Trends in malaria morbidity were also determined. Of the 500 samples studied, 60 were positive, giving an overall prevalence of 12.0% with the prevalence of asymptomatic infection (10.8%), more than quadruple the prevalence of symptomatic infections (1.2%) and, fever burden not due to malaria was 1.4%. The GMPD was 6,869.17 parasites/μL of blood (95% C.I: 4,977.26/μL- 9,480.19/μL). A LLINs coverage of 84.4% and 77.88% usage was observed. Unexpectedly, the prevalence of malaria was higher among those sleeping under LLINs (12.56%) than those not sleeping under LLINs (8.97%), though the difference was not significant (p = 0.371). Being a male (p = 0.044), being unemployed (p = 0.025) and, living in Mbetta (p = 0.013) or Lekwe (p = 0.022) and the presence bushes around homes (p = 0.002) were significant risk factors associated with malaria infection. Trends in proportion demonstrated that, the prevalence of malaria amongst patients receiving treatment in the health center from 2015 to 2019 decreased significantly (p < 0.001) and linearly from 9.74% to 3.08% respectively. Data generated from this study can be exploited for development of a more effective control measures to curb the spread of malaria within Nkongho-mbeng.

Introduction

Malaria is the most prevalent mosquito-borne parasitic disease throughout tropical and subtropical regions of the world. An estimated 228 million cases of malaria occurred worldwide in 2018, accounting for nearly 405000 deaths from malaria globally, compared to 416 000 estimated deaths in 2017, and 585000 in 2010, of which 94% were in WHO African region [1]. However, Cameroon remains among 11 countries that account for 92% of the malaria infection in sub-Saharan-Africa [2]. The disease is endemic in Cameroon with the level of endemicity varying from one ecological zone to another. Studies carried out to investigate the epidemiology of malaria in the South West region of Cameroon have been limited to the slope of Mount Cameroon in Fako Division. However, Nkongho-mbeng in the Nguti Sub-Division defers from Fako division, with its pristine forest vegetation consisting of vast surface areas of unexploited timber and numerous valleys and hills. The poor earth road network and absence of industries and higher institutions of learning, makes the standard of living significantly lower than that of inhabitants of Fako division. Consequently, the epidemiology of malaria may vary in this setting compared to what is seen on the slope of Mount Cameroon.

The Ministry of Public Health in Cameroon reported that malaria causes 30 to 35% of overall mortality and 67% of annual childhood mortality [3]. Insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) have both been demonstrated to reduce malaria [4] and, to date, are the methods mainly used for controlling malaria vectors and associated malaria transmission [5]. Nevertheless, long lasting insecticide-treated bed nets (LLINs) are the major and most promising components of the selective vector control strategies [1], and it is the major malaria control measure used by the Cameroon Ministry of Public Health to fight against the disease and its vector. The poor road network of Nkongho-mbeng may have hindered the level of coverage in the distribution of LLINS. It has been shown in Fako division of the South West Region of Cameroon that LLINS ownership was lower in rural settings than in Semi-Urban communities [6], and, a high malaria prevalence of 30.7% was reported during the rainy season, in Bolifamba following the introduction of LLINs [7]. So far, no study has evaluated the coverage of LLINS in Nkongho-mbeng as well as the level of endemicity of malaria parasite in this community. This study, therefore, aimed at determining the trend and risk factors of malaria within these communities.

Nkongho-mbeng, is an example of a typical rural setting in the equatorial rain forest region of Cameroon. Most of its inhabitants are farmers with low level of education, mainly practicing subsistence farming. Thus, it is probable that the inhabitants may have little or no knowledge about the malaria parasite and the appropriate prevention strategies. This would probably lead to a high burden of the disease when coupled with the enabling environment of the equatorial rain forest of varied topography (highlands, slopes and lowland areas) and meandering streams within settlements, serving as breeding grounds for the malaria vector.

Materials and methods

Study area

This study was carried out in Nkongho-mbeng, a clan in the Nguti sub-division of the Kupe-Manenguba division of the South West Region of Cameroon. Nkongho-mbeng is made up of three villages (Dinte, Mbetta and Lekwe), making up the Mbetta health area of the Fontem health district Fig 1. It is located between latitude 5019’ and 5022’E and longitude 9040’ and 9050’N. The topography is slightly sloppy, surrounded by hills; an earth road, cuts across the three villages and one fast flowing river (the Mekoh river) flows across the three villages. Many other smaller streams are located at different places within the village. Nkongho-mbeng has a typical rain forest vegetation with almost every compound having crops like plantain, banana, cocoa and coffee around their home. The locality experiences two major seasons, dry and rainy seasons. The dry season typically runs from November to February, while the rainy season starts in March and ends in October. The walls of the houses in Nkongho-mbeng are made of mud block and a few with cement block. Majority of the inhabitants are famers and depend solely on agriculture for food and income.

Fig 1

Map of Nkongho-mbeng (Mbetta health area) in the South West Region of Cameroon.

Study design

The study was carried out in two arms. The first arm was a cross-sectional community based household survey conducted in the month of July 2019, during which participants were met at their homes in the evening, when most people were back from their farms and were interview face-to-face or his/her guardian, in the case of under age. Blood samples for microscopy were collected and taken to the St. Theresa Catholic Health Center Mbetta laboratory for analysis. The second arm of the study involved a retrospective collection of data from the South West Regional Delegation of Public Health, Cameroon; during which data of the hospital prevalence from 2015 to 2019 was collected and used for determination of trends in malaria prevalence in Nkongho-mbeng.

Sample size calculation

The minimum sample size was calculated using the Swinscow Formula (Swinscow et al., 2002).

Where; n = minimum sample size for this study;

Z = confidence level,

P = prevalence from a similar study

d = level of precision

(d = 0.05, Z = 1.96, P = 0.5)

A total of 500 participants i.e males and females of all age groups who gave their consent and, ascent in case of minors, were sampled. Those who did not give their consent or assent, people who were not resident in Nkongho-mbeng and, people who had taken malaria drugs two weeks before the survey were not allowed to take part in this study.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the University of Buea Faculty of Health Sciences, Institutional Review Board (Ref: 2019/977-05/UB/SG/IRB/FHS). Administrative clearance was obtained from the Ministry of Public Health, Regional Delegation for the South West Region (Ref: R11/MINSANTE/SWR/RDPH/PS/887/652). Further authorization was obtained from the Fontem Health District Service (Ref: 06MINSANTE/RDSW/DHSF/Vol2/013), chiefs and quarter heads of the Nkongho-mbeng villages. Participants also signed an informed consent form before taking part in the study. For participants who were unable to read or write, the information was read and explained to them and their tomb prints were taken.

Questionnaire administration

A semi-structured questionnaire developed for the purpose of this study was used (supplementary 1). It was pretested in Muea, a quarter in Buea, under Fako division, before being administered to the participants, to collect data on demographics (sex, age, literacy, occupation and marital status); Socioeconomic status (number of house occupants, house type, toilet type, nature of house surroundings, water sources and storage) and, malaria treatment and prevention practices (long lasting insecticide nets (LLINs) ownership, and usage) and indoor residual spray (IRS) usage. Use of LLIN was defined as sleeping under a LLIN every night prior to the survey.

Sample collection

Body temperature of the participants who gave their consent were measured using a thermometer and a finger prick was done using a sterile disposable lancet, to obtain blood sample for microscopic analysis. Data for trends in hospital prevalence of malaria in Nkongho-mbeng was collected from the malaria unit at the South West Regional Delegation of Public Health, Cameroon.

Laboratory analysis

Thick blood films made from participants’ samples, were air-dried and transported to the St Theresa Catholic Health Center Mbetta, where they were stained with 5% Giemsa for fifteen to thirty minutes, rinsed, air dried and observed under the light microscope at X100 objective (oil immersion). A thick blood smear was declared negative, after observing more than 100 fields at X100 high power magnification, and no malaria parasite seen. Positive slides were quantified by counting the number of parasites against 200 white blood cells, and the parasites/μl of blood was calculated by assuming a leucocyte count of 8000 per microliter as reported elsewhere [8].

Statistical analyses

Data collected was analyzed using STATA, IBM-Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM-SPSS) version 25 and Epi-info version 7. Prevalence was calculated by dividing the number of positive samples by the total sample size. The data was tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test and the data was not normally distributed, therefore, Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests were used for analysis of continuous variables (parasite load). Chi-square analysis and Logistic regression were also used for analysis of categorical variables and determination of risk factors was by bivariate and multivariate analysis. Multicollinearity analysis was carried out, to determine possible risk factors which could colinearly influence the regression model. The Chi-squared test for trends in proportion was used to determine trends in malaria prevalence over time. Graphical presentation of the data was done using Microsoft Excel 2013, and SPSS version 25.

Results

Prevalence of malaria in Nkongho-mbeng

Of the 500 blood samples examined, 60 were positive for malaria infection using microscopy giving an overall prevalence of malaria in Nkongho-mbeng of 12.0%, with the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria infection of 10.8% (54/500), which more than quadruples the prevalence of symptomatic malaria infection of 1.2% (6/500) Fig 2. The percentage of fever observed in the community, which was not caused by malaria was 1.4% (7/500). Most (86.6%) of the participants were apparently healthy.

Fig 2

Prevalence of malaria in Nkongho-mbeng.

Prevalence of malaria in relation to demographic factors

The prevalence of malaria was significantly associated with age (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.042), location of villages (p = 0.022) and occupation (p < 0.001) as shown on Table 1. The prevalence of malaria was higher among males (14.90%) than females (8.98%), though the difference was marginally significant (p = 0.042). Malaria infection was most common among infants (26.09%) than any other age category. Equally, malaria prevalence was highest among the unemployed (25.49%) and the inhabitants of Mbetta (14.29%).

Table 1

Prevalence of malaria in relation to demographic factors (N = 500).

Characteristic	Category	Frequency (%)	Prevalence (%)	p-value chi square	Bivariate analysis	P value	Multivariate analysis	P value
					COR (95% CI)		AOR (95% CI)
Gender	FemaleMaleSex ratio (M/F)	245(49.0)255 (51.0)1.15	22 (8.98)38 (14.90)χ2 = 4.150		1		1
				0.042*	1.78 (1.02–3.10)	.044*	1.91 (1.06–3.47)	.032
Age Group (years)	Infants (0<2)Children (2–10)Teenagers (>10–18)Adults (>18–100)	23 (4.6)135(27.0)89 (17.8)253(50.6)	6 (26.09)22 (16.29)19 (21.35)13 (5.38)χ2 = 25.327		1		1
					0.52 (0.23–1.18)	.117	0.84 (.26–2.73)	.778
					0.73 (0.35–1.51)	.388	2.56 (.71–9.28)	.151
				<0.001*	0.15 (0.06 –.41)	< .001*	1.10 (.13–9.70)	.929
Mean ± S.D age	25.30 ± 21.30
Village	DinteLekweMbetta	63 (12.6)220(44.0)217(43.4)	1 (1.59)28 (12.73)31 (14.29)χ2 = 7.652		1		1
					9.04 (1.21–67.83)	.032*	10.83(1.41–83.14)	.022
				0.022*	10.33 (1.38–77.27)	.023*	13.17 (1.71–101.1)	.013
Educational level	No schoolNurseryPrimarySecondaryHigh schoolUniversity	85 (17.0)17 (3.4)254(50.8)120 (24.0)20 (4.0)4 (0.8)	-		1		-	-
					1.09 (0.28–4.29)	.905	-	-
					0.71 (0.36–1.40)	.317	-	-
					0.46 (0.19–1.10)	.079	-	-
					0.56 (0.12–2.71)	.474	-	-
					0	.999	-	-
Occupation	BusinessFarmerHealth workerPupilStudentTeacherUnemployed	33 (6.6)158 (31.6)11 (2.2)143 (28.6)88 (17.6)16 (3.2)51 (10.2)	1 (3.03)7 (4.43)0 (0.0)27 (18.88)10 (11.36)2 (12.50)13 (25.49)χ2 = 27.826	< 0.001*	11.48 (0.18–12.48)0.007.45 (0.97–56.94)4.10 (0.50–33.38)4.57 (0.38–54.66)10.95 (1.36–88.30)	0.7170.9990.0530.1870.2300.025*	11.04 (.11–9.94)0.0071.64 (1.61–3185)21.94 (0.54–900.0)4.76 (0.35–65.30)139.27 (2.62–7401)	0.9710.9990.0270.1030.2430.015
Marital status	SingleMarriedWidowWidower	341(68.2)134 (26.8)24 (4.8)1 (0.2)	-	-
Religion	ChristianMuslimPagan	478 (95.6)6 (1.2)16 (3.2)	-	-
House type	CementMud	88 (17.6)412 (82.4)	-	-	1		-	-
					0.84 (0.42–1.65)	0.603	-	-
1Household size	1–10> 10	387(77.4)113(22.6)	-	-
Income level (CFA)	< 25,00025,000–50,000> 50,000	320(64.0)142(28.4)38 (7.6)	-	-	1		1
					0.42 (0.21–0.85)	0.017*	14.76(.59–369.9)	0.101
					0.15 (0.02–1.12)	0.064	3.32 (.12–94.49)	0.483
Toilet type	Pit latrineFlushing toiletNo toilet	462 (92.4)31(6.2)7 (1.4)	-	-

S.D = Standard Deviation M/F ratio = Male to Female ratio COR: Crude Odds Ratio AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio.

* Statistically significant association, p < 0.05 χ2 = Pearson’s Chi square test.

Logistic regression analysis was carried out between malaria prevalence as dependent variable and socio-demographic as independent variables, for all the variables which were significant by bivariate analysis. In the bivariate analysis, males (cOR = 1.78, p = .044), being unemployed (cOR = 10.95, p = .025), those residing in Lekwe (cOR = 9.04, p = 0.032) and Mbetta (cOR = 10.33, p = 0.023) were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of Malaria infection among inhabitants of Nkongho-mbeng. Nonetheless, it was observed that increase in age (p < 0.001) and increase in income level (p = .017) significantly reduced the odds of being malaria infected. Hence, age (cOR = 0.15) and income (cOR = 0.42) levels were considered as protective factors of malaria infection. After performing the multivariate logistic regression analysis, being unemployed (p = .015), being a pupil (p = 0.027), as well as living in Lekwe (p = .022) and Mbetta (p = 0.013) were found to be the significant risk factors of malaria among the people of Nkongho-mbeng.

Multicollinearity analysis revealed that all the variables associated with income levels had variance inflation factor less than 3 (Table 2). So, there is no evidence of multicollinearity amongst the risk factors associated with income level.

Table 2

Variance inflation factor values for multicollinearity of variables associated with income level in Nkongho-mbeng.

Independent variableDependentvariable	House type	House size	ceiling type	window nets	Toilet type	Educational level	monthly income
House type	-	1.647	1.488	1.778	1.674	1.825	1.786
House size	1.199	-	1.321	1.316	1.325	1.329	1.318
Ceiling type	1.450	1.769	-	1.482	1.776	1.777	1.776
Window nets	1.398	1.422	1.196	-	1.316	1.435	1.437
Toilet type	1.221	1.328	1.330	1.220	-	1.331	1.333
Educational level	1.073	1.074	1.072	1.073	1.073	-	1.027
monthly income	1.090	1.105	1.112	1.114	1.115	1.065	-

Environmental and behavioral characteristics of the study population in relation to malaria prevalence

Participants living in bushy areas had significantly (p < 0.001) higher malaria prevalence (23.23%) than those living in non-bushy areas (9.23%) Table 3. Similarly, those residing around stagnant water had significantly (p = 0.045) higher malaria prevalence (15.35%) than those residing in areas with no stagnant water (9.47%). Though not significant (p = 0.814), malaria prevalence was higher among those living around streams (12.29%) compared to those not living around streams (11.59%).

Table 3

Environmental and behavioral characteristics of the study population in relation to malaria prevalence.

Variable	Category	Frequency	Percentage	prevalence	P value Chi square	Bivariate analysis		Multivariate analysis
						COR (95% CI)	P value	AOR (95% CI)	P value
Use of insecticides spray	Yes	22	4.4			1
	No	478	95.6	60 (12.0)	p = .076	0	0.998	–	–
Presence of bushes	Yes	99	19.8	23 (23.23)		1		1
	No	401	80.2	37 (9.23)	p < .001*	2.98(1.67–5.30)	< .001*	2.72 (1.44–5.13)	0.002*
Presence of stream around home	Yes	293	58.6	36 (12.29)		1
	No	207	41.4	24 (11.59)	p = .814	1.07 (.62–1.85)	0.814
Presence of stagnant water	Yes	215	56.7	33 (15.35)		1		1
	No	164	43.3	27 (9.47)	p = .045*	1.73 (.01–2.98)	0.047*	1.22 (0.67–2.24)	0.515
Use of window nets	Yes	75	15.0
	No	425	85.0
Ceiling type	Bamboo	22	4.4	4 (18.18)		1
	Plywood	151	30.2	19 (12.58)		1.67 (.60–1.95)	0.377
	Zinc	12	2.4	0 (0)		1.08 (.54–5.20)	0.795
	No ceiling	315	63.0	37 (11.75)	p = .475	.000	0.999
Source of water	Tap	93	18.6	8 (8.60)		1
	Stream	123	24.6	22 (17.89)		1.53 (.34–6.80)	0.578
	Spring	257	51.4	28 (10.89)		2.72 (.60–12.35)	0.194
	River	27	5.4	2 (7.41)	p = 0.117	1.18 (.24–5.90)	0.843
Water storage method	Both	424	84.8	49 (11.56)		1
	Close containers	44	8.8	6 (13.64)		1.21 (.49–3.01)	0.684
	Open containers	32	6.4	5 (15.63)	p = .745	1.42 (.52–3.85)	0.494

COR: Crude Odds Ratio AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio * Statistically significant association, p < 0.05 χ2 = Pearson’s Chi square test.

In the bivariate analysis, those residing around bushy areas (cOR = 2.98, p < .001) and areas of stagnant water (cOR = 1.73, p = 0.047) were significantly associated with malaria infection. After performing the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only living around bushy areas (p = 0.002), was found to be a significant environmental risk factors for malaria infection in Nkongho-mbeng.

Prevalence of malaria in relation to malaria management characteristics of study participants

The prevalence of malaria was significantly (p = 0.005) higher among those who had been infected with malaria before (11.4%) than those who have not been infected with malaria before (0.6%) Table 4. Those who were lastly diagnose of malaria five months prior to the survey had the highest prevalence (7.8%) compared to those who were diagnoses of malaria one month (1.4%), and one year (2.2%) prior to this study. Majority of the participants (45%) commonly receive their malaria treatment from Health centers, although 7% practice auto-medication, while 2.4% depend on herbalist for treatment. Surprisingly, people who practice auto medication had zero prevalence of malaria. The commonly reported drugs used for treatment of malaria in these communities were Athermeter (21.2%), quinine (12%) and herbs (7.3%).

Table 4

Prevalence of malaria in relation to malaria management characteristics of participants.

Variable	Category	Frequency	Percentage	Prevalence	Significance
Have you had malaria before?	Yes	409	81.8	57(11.4)	X2 = 7.980, p = .005*
	No	91	18.2	3(0.6)
If yes when last were you sick of malaria?	one month ago	63	12.6	7(1.4)	X2 = 21.782, p < .001*
	five months ago	224	44.8	39(7.8)
	1 year and above	120	24.0	11(2.2)
Where do you take treatment?	Auto medication	35	7.0	-	X2 = 16.798, p = .002*
	drug store	137	27.4	18(3.6)
	Health center	225	45.0	36(7.2)
	herbalist	12	2.4	3(0.6)
drugs used	Athermeter	106	21.2	14(2.8)	X2 = 10.053, p = .040*
	Quinine	60	12.0	9(1.8)
	herbs	39	7.3	3(0.6)
	don’t know	203	40.6	31(6.2)

Relationship between the prevalence of malaria and duration of stay in Nkongho-mbeng

Chi square test showed a significant relationship between malaria prevalence and duration of stay (X2 = 26.852, p < 0.001). Participants who had resided for 10–15 years in Nkongho-mbeng had the highest prevalence of malaria compared to those in the other groups as indicated on Fig 3.

Fig 3

Relationship between the prevalence of malaria and duration of stay in Nkongho-mbeng.

Parasite density of malaria

The overall geometric mean parasite density (GMPD) of malaria among the people of Nkongho-mbeng was 6,869.17 parasites/μL of blood (95% C.I: 4,977.26/μL– 9,480.19/μL) Table 5.The GMPD in males (8,467.40 parasites/μL) was significantly (p = 0.030) higher than in females (4,786.16 parasites/μL). Equally, the GMPD of malaria was significantly (p < 0.001) higher among teachers (26,037.78/μL) than those in other professions, (H = 28.172/μL). With regards to marital status, the GMPD was significantly (p = 0.001) higher among singles (7000.12 Parasites/μL) than those married (5795.57 Parasites/μL), (H = 15.420/μL,).

Table 5

Geometric mean parasite density of malaria with respect to demographic factors.

Characteristics	Category	Number examined	GMPD (Parasites/μL)	Statistics	P value
Overall GMPD			6869.17
Sex	Female	245	4,786.16	U = 29255	0.030*
	Male	255	8,467.40
Occupation	Business	33	7,407.41	H = 28.172	< 0.001*
	Farmer	158	5,834.80
	Health worker	11	0
	Pupil	143	6,315.56
	Student	88	5,319.37
	Teacher	16	26,037.78
	Unemployed	51	8,804.98
Marital status	Single	341	7000.12	H = 15.420	0.001*
	Married	134	5795.57
	Widow	24	0
	Widower	1	0

* Significant association, p < 0.05 H = Kruskal-Wallis test U = Mann-Whitney.

Parasite density with respect to age groups

The parasite density of malaria was significantly associated with age (H = 23.209, p < 0.001). Adults (835 parasites/μL) had the lowest parasite density of malaria while infants (6712 parasites/μL) had the highest parasite loads of malaria in the study as shown in Fig 4.

Fig 4

Parasite density with respect to age groups.

Parasite density with relation to duration of stay in the community

The mean malaria parasite density was significantly associated with duration of stay in the community (H = 27.02, p < 0.001). Participants who had resided in Nkongho-mbeng for less than 5 years had higher malaria parasite loads (4272.41 parasites/μL) than those who had lived for 5 years and above as illustrated on Fig 5.

Fig 5

Parasite density with relation to duration of stay.

Relationship between mean parasite density of malaria and income level

A Spearman’s rank correlation showed that, the mean parasite density of malaria decreased significantly with increase in income level (r = - 0.137, p = 0.002) (Fig 6).

Fig 6

Relationship between mean parasite density of malaria and income level.

Parasite density of malaria with respect to the participants’ villages

The geometric mean parasite density of malaria was significantly higher among the inhabitants of Dinte village (33600 parasites/μL) compared to those residing in Lekwe (6724 parasites/μL) and Mbetta (6653 parasites/μL); (H = 7.394, p = 0.025) as shown in Fig 7.

Fig 7

Geometric mean parasite density of malaria with respect to villages examined.

Determination of LLINs coverage and usage in Nkongho-Mbeng

Up to 422 of the 500 participants owned LLINs at home giving a percentage LLINs coverage in Nkongho-Mbeng of 84.4% as shown in Fig 8A. Most (70.28%) of the LLINs used in Nkongho-Mbeng were old LLINs ie more than three years old (Fig 8B). Majority (77.88%) of the inhabitants slept under LLINs daily. Some (20.94%) slept infrequently under LLINs while a few (1.18%) did not use LLINs (Fig 8C).

Fig 8

A: Percentage of LLINs ownership in Nkongho-Mbeng, B: State of LLINs used in Nkongho-mbeng (Old = LLINs acquired more than 3year ago, fairly use = LLINs acquired between one and three years, and new = LLINs that were less than a year old) and C: Frequency of LLINs usage in Nkongho-mbeng.

Prevalence and parasite density of malaria with respect to utilization of LLINs

Unexpectedly, the prevalence of malaria was higher among those sleeping under LLINs (12.56%) than those not sleeping under LLINs (8.97%), though the difference in prevalence was not significant (p = 0.371) Table 6. However, the GMPD of malaria was higher among those not sleeping under LLINs (10659.07/μL) than those sleeping under LLINs (6481.89/μL), although the difference was not significant (p = 0.399). In terms of frequency of LLINs used, those that slept under LLINs infrequently (13.48%) had higher malaria prevalence than those that slept under LLINs daily (12.69%) although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.678). The parasite load was similar among those that slept under LLINs daily (6351.64/μL) and those that slept under LLINs infrequently (6007.99/μL, p = 0.684).

Table 6

Prevalence and parasite density of malaria with respect to utilization of LLINs.

Characteristic	Category	Number examined	No Positive (%)	GMPD (Parasite/μL)
Presence of LLINs	Yes	422	53 (12.56)	6481.89
	No	78	7 (8.97)	10659.07
Significance			p = 0.371a	U = 15900.0, p = 0.399
Frequency of LLINs usage	Everyday	331	42 (12.69)	6351.64
	Some days	89	12 (13.48)	6007.99
	don’t use	5	0	0.0
Significance			p = 0.678 a	H = 0.759, p = 0.684
State of LLINs	Fairly use	72	5 (6.94)	14,236.42
	New	54	9 (16.67)	10504.71
	Old	298	40 (13.42)	5042.693
Significance			p = 0.218a	H = 2.869, p = 0.238

a: P value computed from chi square test H = Kruskal-Wallis test U = Mann-Whitney test.

Trends in the prevalence of malaria from 2015–2019 in Nkongho-mbeng

The Chi-squared test for trends in proportion among hospital attending patients demonstrated that, the prevalence of malaria per 1,000 inhabitants decreased significantly and linearly from 9.74% in 2015, to 3.08% in 2019 (X2 = 406.64, p < 0.001) as shown on Fig 9.

Fig 9

Trends in Malaria prevalence per 1,000 inhabitants in Nkongho-mbeng from 2015–2019.

Discussion

The overall prevalence of malaria parasite infection in Nkongho-mbeng was found to be 12.0%. This observed prevalence is in line with 14.5% and 8.8% prevalence observed in a study in Bamenda and Ngaoundere, respectively, which are towns found in different epidemiological strata within Cameroon [9]. Based on the classification of malaria endemicity [10], Nkongho-mbeng could be ranked on the scale of Plasmodium falciparum parasite rate for the age group 2–10 years (pfpr2-10) as belonging to a mesoendemic stratum where transmission is high, under normal rainfall conditions and low during the dry season.

However, the overall prevalence of malaria in Nkongho-mbeng in this study (12%) was lower than that reported in other areas of the South West Region of Cameroon by previous studies; 27.7%, 33.3%, 33.7%, 20.1% and 27.4% [7,6,11,12], in the Mount Cameroon area and in Limbe [9], respectively. The low prevalence observed in this study could be as a result of the period, during which this study was carried out (July); the peak of the rainy season with frequent heavy rains with too much run-offs, which might have washed off breeding sites of the mosquitos vectors.

Prevalence of malaria infection was higher among infants (26.09%) than any other age group category. This observation in prevalence, among infants, is in line with other studies [6,11] carried out in some rural and urban settings in the South West Region of Cameroon with a prevalence of 27.7% and 29.6%, respectively in children <15 years of age. In contrast, higher prevalence of 46.7% and 66.9% in children less than 15 years has been reported in other areas in the Mount Cameroon area [13,14].

Malaria prevalence was also observed to be significantly associated with gender (p = 0.042), with males having a higher prevalence (14.90%) compared to females (8.98%), though the difference was minimal. This could be due to the fact that, men frequently stay out of their home late into the night and carry out more outdoor activities- like leaving their homes very early in the morning before it’s dawn to go to their farms and often have to spend several days living in their farm houses, as such, exposing themselves to the mosquito vector. However, this was in contrast to previous findings, which showed a higher prevalence among woman than men in the mount Cameroon area, which is attributed to females spending more time outdoors at dusk and dawn than males to perform household chores, and as such, are more exposed to mosquito bites in this area [11,15].

Equally, malaria prevalence was significantly higher among the unemployed (p<0.001) and the GMPD decreased significantly with increase in income level (r = - 0.137, p = 0.002). This high prevalence among the unemployed is in concordance with the observation that poverty and socio-economic status of individuals can lead to increase in malaria prevalence [16,17] due to the fact that, the poorest people often have limited access to health services, particularly in rural settings.

The overall geometric mean parasite density (GMPD) of malaria among the people of Nkongho-mbeng in the current study was 6,869 parasites/μL of blood. This is similar to GMPD of 7,874 parasites/μL that was observed in a study carried out in Central Ghana [18] and 7,345 parasites/μL in Sudan [19]. The geometric mean parasite density of malaria was significantly associated with gender, age group, occupation and marital status. The differences observed in parasite density among different age groups with infants being the most heavily parasitized could be attributed to the fact that older people can control parasite densities than younger ones due to immunity build-up over time, from years of exposure to the parasite [20,21].

In relation to gender and marital status, the GMPD in this study was observed to be higher in males than females and in singles than in married people. This is contrary to what was observed in Muea, located in Fako division in the South West Region of Cameroon, where there was no significant difference in GMPD between sexes [22]. The parasite density in men could be due to the fact that, men spend more time outdoor and in farmhouses, and male children play outdoors in the evenings more often than female children and, are therefore, more exposed to mosquito bites. The fact that singles had higher parasite densities when compared with married persons, irrespective of age, suggests that other factors may account for high parasite load in singles. Some studies suggest that, marriage could improve health outcomes in a variety of ways: it may improve economic well-being [23], health outcomes by enhancing access to health care or lowering stress. In addition, a spouse may play an important role in monitoring and encouraging healthy behaviors [24].

Duration of stay in Nkongho-mbeng was observed to be significantly associated with parasite density, with individuals who have lived for less than 15 years in this community having a higher parasite load than those who lived there beyond 15 years. A similar observation was made in Bolifamba [7]. This could be due to acquired immunity developed with prolonged duration of stay for people who have lived within this community longer than 15 years.

With reference to participants’ income level, in this study, a correlation analysis showed that, the mean parasite density of malaria decreased significantly with increase in income level. This could be as a result of low nutritional balance and inability to access quality health care due to poverty in individuals with low income level. Our findings concur with observations elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa, where study participants with low socio-economic status and income level were more liable to be infected than those with high income level [25,26].

The prevalence and geometric mean parasite density of malaria was seen to be significantly associated with presence of bushes and presence of stagnant water around houses. Participants living in bushy environments had significantly higher malaria prevalence and GMPD than those living in non-bushy areas. In the same line, those residing around stagnant water had significantly higher malaria prevalence (15.35%), but a lower GMPD than those residing in non-stagnant water areas. Malaria prevalence and GMPD were also higher among those living around streams, compared to those who were not living around streams, though not statistically significant. This could be from constant exposure to the vector as a result of living around vector breeding sites. This finding is in accordance with the findings in the high lands of Western Kenya, where participants that lived around streams had a higher GMPD compared to those that did not live around streams [27].

LLINs have been shown to reduce the burden of malaria infections, but coverage continues to be moderate in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa. However, our study showed a high ownership (84.4%) and usage (77.88%) by all persons in the area after the campaign, as reported elsewhere [28-30]. This high coverage of LLINs in Nkongho-mbeng could be due to the presence of more than two household members in almost all households in Nkongho-mbeng. Previous studies have shown that household whose family sizes are >2 have more chances of owning and using LLINs compared to their counterparts living in household with family size ≤ 2 [31,32]. This high LLINs coverage in Nkongho-mbeng could also be as a result of proper distribution of LLNs by the health facility during the campaigns. These findings are however in contrast what was observed in Fako division on the slope of Mount Cameroon, where there was a low ownership and usage of LLINs in rural areas compared to semi-urban settings [6].

The present study investigated the potential risk factors associated with malaria infection in Nkongho-mbeng. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, residing around bushy areas and areas of stagnant water, and male participants were significantly associated with the prevalence of malaria infection among people of Nkongho-mbeng. These findings are consistent with those of other studies conducted in Bomaka and Molyko, located on the slope of mount Cameroon, and with a study on individual and housing factors influencing the incidence of malaria in Ethiopia, where residing around bushy areas and areas of stagnant water were identified as risk factors for malaria [15,33]. Living in Lekwe and Mbetta were also shown to increase the odds of being infected with malaria. Our study showed that, the prevalence of malaria in Lekwe (12.73%) and Mbetta, (14.29) was observed to be far higher than the 1.59% seen in Dinte. This finding could be due to the fact that the topography of Dinte is hilly compared to that of Lekwe and Mbetta which are more of lowland areas which harbor several breeding grounds for the malaria vector. Other studies have shown that, living around malaria vectors breeding grounds are a potential risk factor for malaria infection [15,34]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed that being a pupil was a possible determinant of malaria infection in Nkongho-mbeng. Similar findings have been reported elsewhere [35,36]. This could be as a result of pupils constantly playing around the malaria vector breeding site, hence constantly exposed to the vector. This could also be as a result of a weak immune system in younger aged children.

The prevalence of malaria amongst the health care seeing population in Nkongho-mbeng decreased significantly from 2015 to 2019.This significant decrease in malaria morbidity could be due to constant emigration of people from Nkongho-mbeng to other regions where their children can have access to quality education and health care, due to the crisis in the English speaking regions of Cameroon. This could also be as a result of several inhabitants not being able to afford the cost of health care services due to economic hardship and poverty in Nkongho-mbeng that is being aggravated by the crisis. As a result, many people may be seeking treatment elsewhere other than the health facility, as such are not being considered in the data that is sent to the South West Regional Delegation of Public Health from heath facilities.

In conclusion, the prevalence of malaria in Nkongho-Mbeng located in the Nguti division of the South West Region of Cameroon is decreasing, with a currently low prevalence of 12%. Risk factors for the disease include; presence of bushes around homes and being unemployed, although there is a high level of ownership and usage of LLINs in the communities.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.

19 Mar 2021

PONE-D-21-00225

Trends in malaria prevalence and risk factors associated with the disease in Nkongho-Mbeng; a typical rural setting in the equatorial rainforest of the South West Region of Cameroon

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. NYASA,

After careful consideration, we feel that your manuscript will likely be suitable for publication if the authors revise it to address critical points raised by the reviewer.  According to reviewer, there are some specific areas where further improvements would be of substantial benefit to the readers.   A major concern was related to the multicollinearity in the  regression analyses.  For your guidance, a copy of the reviewer' comments was included below.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Abril 10. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Luzia Helena Carvalho, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

5. Please ensure you have thoroughly discussed any potential limitations of this study within the Discussion section, including the potential impact of confounding factors.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a well-done and important contribution to the malaria literature. Updating the epidemiological profile of malaria prevalence is important for prioritizing control and prevention activities, and this study provides results that are useful for informing prevention and control. I have a few minor items I would like the authors to address:

1. Including a map showing the study area would be helpful to the reader.

2. It would be useful for the authors to address the possibility of multicollinearity in the multiple regression analyses between income level and variables associated with income level (housing structure, window screens, etc). Was multicollinearity assessed, and is it something that needs to be addressed? This is the most important comment I have.

3. Consider eliminating the p-values in tables 1 and 2 for the regression results. The 95% confidence intervals are the most important to include, and p-values are not as meaningful.

4. I found the high infant prevalence to be interesting. The authors addressed the role of no built immunity as a reason for higher prevalence in this age group, which is an appropriate explanation. I am curious about the sleeping habits of infants in the study areas in relation to LLIN use- do infants typically sleep with a guardian? Is it known whether infants typically sleep under LLINs?

5. In figure 7, consider using the same type of figure to maintain consistency (either use all pie charts or all bar graphs)

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

13 Apr 2021

Dear Editor,

We appreciate the significant contributions of the reviewers, which has given a face-lift to the manuscript. We are very grateful to them. However, our opinion differs with theirs on some minor issues, which could still be amended based on your recommendation. Details of the corrections are as below.

1) Including a map showing the study area would be helpful to the reader.

A map of the study area has been drawn and included in the manuscript.

2) It would be useful for the authors to address the possibility of multicollinearity in the multiple regression analyses between income level and variables associated with income level (housing structure, window screens, etc). Was multicollinearity assessed, and is it something that needs to be addressed? This is the most important comment I have.

Multicollinearity analysis has been carried out and the results included in the manuscript.

3) Consider eliminating the p-values in tables 1 and 2 for the regression results. The 95% confidence intervals are the most important to include, and p-values are not as meaningful.

Although the 95% confidence intervals are the most important, novices to statistics easily interpret p-values than confidence intervals. Thus, having both will enable us to effectively communicate to a wider audience.

4) I found the high infant prevalence to be interesting. The authors addressed the role of no built immunity as a reason for higher prevalence in this age group, which is an appropriate explanation. I am curious about the sleeping habits of infants in the study areas in relation to LLIN use- do infants typically sleep with a guardian? Is it known whether infants typically sleep under LLINs?

There is no statistically significant difference (p=0.06) in LLINs usage between this age group and other age groups. Many other studies elsewhere have reported higher prevalence of malaria in this age group than the general population.

5) In figure 7, consider using the same type of figure to maintain consistency (either use all pie charts or all bar graphs)

If we use all pie charts or all bar charts, the manuscript may become banal and too uniform to the viewer, to incite interest in reading onward.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

26 Apr 2021

Trends in malaria prevalence and risk factors associated with the disease in Nkongho-mbeng; a typical rural setting in the equatorial rainforest of the South West Region of Cameroon

PONE-D-21-00225R1

Dear Dr. NYASA,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Luzia Helena Carvalho, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I commend the authors for addressing the reviewer comments, and I am thankful for the reminder that p-values can be more useful to a broader audience. This is an excellent perspective that I will keep in mind myself moving forward in my own work. Additionally, the map is wonderful! Great work to the authors.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

29 Apr 2021

PONE-D-21-00225R1

Trends in malaria prevalence and risk factors associated with the disease in Nkongho-mbeng; a typical rural setting in the equatorial rainforest of the South West Region of Cameroon

Dear Dr. Nyasa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Luzia Helena Carvalho

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE