Literature DB >> 34003474

Cutting Through the "Gray Area": An Analysis of the IBC Regulatory Oversight of Applications of CRISPR Technology in Clinical Research.

Westley F Weiss1.   

Abstract

The advent of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has quickly ushered in a new era of gene editing and offered exciting potential for the development of biomedical products. While the breadth of applications for CRISPR encompasses nearly the entire field of medical science, its utilization to produce next-generation CAR T cells stands to benefit most substantially in the short-term. These novel therapeutics are now beginning to enter the clinical trial phase of the numerous approval pipelines, but does the existing regulatory framework have the capability to adequately review and approve the initiation of these new age research endeavors in the clinical setting? This analysis will illuminate the similarity and differences between CRISPR developed interventions and existing techniques used to produce biomedical products from a regulatory perspective in the United States. Further, the "gray area" surrounding CRISPR regulatory oversight will be explored and recommendations will be made to facilitate the elimination of inconsistencies that currently exist in the assessment of this work prior to the initiation of associated clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosafety; CRISPR; Clinical research; FDA; IBC; NIH Guidelines; Regulatory oversight

Year:  2021        PMID: 34003474     DOI: 10.1007/s43441-021-00294-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Institutional Review Boards: Purpose and Challenges.

Authors:  Christine Grady
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  The Next Phase of Human Gene-Therapy Oversight.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Scott Gottlieb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Historical perspectives pertaining to the NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee.

Authors:  Nelson A Wivel
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.695

4.  The technical risks of human gene editing.

Authors:  Benjamin Davies
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  History of CRISPR-Cas from Encounter with a Mysterious Repeated Sequence to Genome Editing Technology.

Authors:  Yoshizumi Ishino; Mart Krupovic; Patrick Forterre
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  The length of guide RNA and target DNA heteroduplex effects on CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing efficiency in porcine cells.

Authors:  Jiawei Lv; Shuang Wu; Renyue Wei; Yan Li; Junxue Jin; Yanshuang Mu; Yu Zhang; Qingran Kong; Xiaogang Weng; Zhonghua Liu
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 7.  Building Potent Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells With CRISPR Genome Editing.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Guangyu Zhou; Li Zhang; Qi Zhao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond.

Authors:  Mazhar Adli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.