Zifang Huang1, Wenyuan Sui2, Han Huang3, Yaolong Deng2, Jianyi Li4, Limin Liu5, Jingfan Yang6, Junlin Yang7. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 2. Spine Surgery Center, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 4. Department of Anatomy, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 6. Spine Surgery Center, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, China. 463042204@qq.com. 7. Spine Surgery Center, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, China. yangjunlin@xinhuamed.com.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify osteotomy protocol for severe spinal deformity correction based on pre-operative demographic, clinical and radiologic parameters. METHODS: A total of 131 Yang's A type severe spinal deformity patients were included. All patients received one of following osteotomies: Ponte/2 (Ponte osteotomy/Grade 2 osteotomy, n = 30), PSO/3 (pedicle subtraction osteotomy/Grade 3 osteotomy, n = 19), BDBO/4 (bone-disc-bone osteotomy/Grade 4 osteotomy, n = 26), SVCR/5 (single-level vertebral column resection/Grade 5 osteotomy, n = 38) and MVCR/6 (multilevel vertebral column resection/Grade 6 osteotomy, n = 18). Demographic, clinical and radiologic characteristics were compared among groups. RESULTS: Tukey's test identified 6 significant variables between paired groups: age for MVCR/6 versus Ponte/2 + PSO/3 + BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 groups; bending Cobb angle for Ponte/2 versus MVCR/6; sagittal deformity angular ratio (S-DAR) for Ponte/2 + PSO/3 versus BDBO/3 + SVCR/5 versus MVCR/6; pre-operative scoliosis for Ponte/2 versus SVCR/5; total-DAR (T-DAR) and pre-operative kyphosis for Ponte/2 + PSO/3 versus BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 + MVCR/6. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis showed the Area under the Curve (AUC) for the 6 variables ranged from 0.69 to 0.839. Multivariate k-means clustering analysis showed that Ponte/2 + PSO/3, BDBO/4 + SVCR/5, and MVCR/6 were three comparatively significant clusters, which could be discriminated by pre-operative kyphosis, T-DAR, age and S-DAR. CONCLUSION: This study showed that osteotomy plan of severe spinal deformity could be determined as follows: Firstly, Ponte/2 + PSO/3 and BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 + MVCR/6 groups can be divided by either T-DAR (cutoff = 28) or the Cobb angle of pre-operative maximum kyphosis (cutoff = 100). Secondly, Ponte/2 + PSO/3 group could be further dichotomized into Ponte/2 and PSO/3 by age (cutoff = 18). Finally, BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 + MVCR/6 group could be divided into BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 and MVCR/6 groups by S-DAR (cutoff = 20).
PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify osteotomy protocol for severe spinal deformity correction based on pre-operative demographic, clinical and radiologic parameters. METHODS: A total of 131 Yang's A type severe spinal deformitypatients were included. All patients received one of following osteotomies: Ponte/2 (Ponte osteotomy/Grade 2 osteotomy, n = 30), PSO/3 (pedicle subtraction osteotomy/Grade 3 osteotomy, n = 19), BDBO/4 (bone-disc-bone osteotomy/Grade 4 osteotomy, n = 26), SVCR/5 (single-level vertebral column resection/Grade 5 osteotomy, n = 38) and MVCR/6 (multilevel vertebral column resection/Grade 6 osteotomy, n = 18). Demographic, clinical and radiologic characteristics were compared among groups. RESULTS: Tukey's test identified 6 significant variables between paired groups: age for MVCR/6 versus Ponte/2 + PSO/3 + BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 groups; bending Cobb angle for Ponte/2 versus MVCR/6; sagittal deformity angular ratio (S-DAR) for Ponte/2 + PSO/3 versus BDBO/3 + SVCR/5 versus MVCR/6; pre-operative scoliosis for Ponte/2 versus SVCR/5; total-DAR (T-DAR) and pre-operative kyphosis for Ponte/2 + PSO/3 versus BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 + MVCR/6. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis showed the Area under the Curve (AUC) for the 6 variables ranged from 0.69 to 0.839. Multivariate k-means clustering analysis showed that Ponte/2 + PSO/3, BDBO/4 + SVCR/5, and MVCR/6 were three comparatively significant clusters, which could be discriminated by pre-operative kyphosis, T-DAR, age and S-DAR. CONCLUSION: This study showed that osteotomy plan of severe spinal deformity could be determined as follows: Firstly, Ponte/2 + PSO/3 and BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 + MVCR/6 groups can be divided by either T-DAR (cutoff = 28) or the Cobb angle of pre-operative maximum kyphosis (cutoff = 100). Secondly, Ponte/2 + PSO/3 group could be further dichotomized into Ponte/2 and PSO/3 by age (cutoff = 18). Finally, BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 + MVCR/6 group could be divided into BDBO/4 + SVCR/5 and MVCR/6 groups by S-DAR (cutoff = 20).
Authors: Frank Schwab; Benjamin Blondel; Edward Chay; Jason Demakakos; Lawrence Lenke; Patrick Tropiano; Christopher Ames; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Steven Glassman; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Lawrence G Lenke; Brenda A Sides; Linda A Koester; Marsha Hensley; Kathy M Blanke Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 4.176