Literature DB >> 34003348

Implementation of a computed tomography dose management program across a multinational healthcare organization.

Katia Katsari1,2, Hugo Pasquier3, Milan Barati4, Pilar Pujadas3, Rowland O Illing5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Radiation dose index monitoring (RDIM) systems may help identify CT dose reduction opportunities, but variability and complexity of imaging procedures make consistent dose optimization and standardization a challenge. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility to standardize and optimize CT protocols through the implementation of a Dose Excellence Program within a European healthcare network.
METHODS: The Dose Excellence Program consisted of a multidisciplinary team that developed standardized organizational adult CT protocols and thresholds for relevant radiation dose indices (RDIs). Baseline data were collected retrospectively from the RDIM (Phase I, 2015). Organization's protocols were implemented and monitored from the RDIM for deviations (Phase II, 2016). Following standardization, radiation dose optimization was initiated (Phase III, 2017). Data from the three most used protocols were retrospectively extracted and grouped by country for all phases. The mean number of series (RS) and RDIs were compared between phases and with organizational reference levels. A Mann-Whitney test was conducted; p < .05 was considered as significant.
RESULTS: Data from 9588, 12638, and 6093 examinations were analyzed from General Chest, General Head, and Thorax/Abdomen/Pelvis (TAP) multiphase respectively. Overall, after Phase III, mean RS and CTDIvol p75 were below the organizational reference levels in all countries for the three protocols. The CTDIvol decreased by 45% in Switzerland (p < .00001), 32% in Turkey (p < .00001), and 28% in Switzerland (p = .0027) for General Chest, General Head, and TAP multiphase respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a Dose Excellence Program within a large-scale healthcare organization allowed unifying protocols and optimizing radiation dose across countries. KEY POINTS: • Engaging a multidisciplinary team can enhance the use of an RDIM system for CT dose management in a multinational healthcare environment. • Deep dive of baseline data and standardization of CT practices by defining organizational clinical indication CT protocols with RPIDs is an essential step before optimization of radiation dose. • Following the implementation of the program, the mean RS and CTDIvol were below or equal to the organizational reference levels in all countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiation dosage; Reference standards; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Year:  2021        PMID: 34003348     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07986-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  11 in total

1.  A Comprehensive CT Dose Reduction Program Using the ACR Dose Index Registry.

Authors:  Brent P Little; Phuong-Anh Duong; Jessie Knighton; Kristen Baugnon; Erica Campbell-Brown; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Steve St Louis; Habib Tannir; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 2.  Computed tomography: revolutionizing the practice of medicine for 40 years.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Opportunities to Reduce CT Radiation Exposure, Experience Over 5 Years at the NIH Clinical Center.

Authors:  William C Kovacs; Jianhua Yao; David A Bluemke; Les R Folio
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Utilisation of PACS to monitor patient CT doses.

Authors:  J S AlSuwaidi; M Bayoumi; N Al Shibli; H Sulaiman; T Urrahman; M AlYarah
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Jafi Lipson; Ralph Marcus; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Robert Gould; Amy Berrington de González; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

6.  Radiology stewardship and quality improvement: the process and costs of implementing a CT radiation dose optimization committee in a medium-sized community hospital system.

Authors:  Jenifer R Q W Siegelman; Dustin A Gress
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Biological Effects of Low-Dose Chest CT on Chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  Hiroaki Sakane; Mari Ishida; Lin Shi; Wataru Fukumoto; Chiemi Sakai; Yoshihiro Miyata; Takafumi Ishida; Tomoyuki Akita; Morihito Okada; Kazuo Awai; Satoshi Tashiro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Andrew Williams; Robert T Greenlee; Sheila Weinmann; Leif I Solberg; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Douglas Roblin; Michael J Flynn; Nicholas Vanneman; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  AAPM medical physics practice guideline 6.a.: Performance characteristics of radiation dose index monitoring systems.

Authors:  Dustin A Gress; Renee L Dickinson; William D Erwin; David W Jordan; Robert J Kobistek; Donna M Stevens; Mark P Supanich; Jia Wang; Lynne A Fairobent
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Yifei Wang; Philip Chu; Robert Chung; Andrew J Einstein; Jonathan Balcombe; Mary Cocker; Marcos Das; Bradley N Delman; Michael Flynn; Robert Gould; Ryan K Lee; Thomas Yellen-Nelson; Sebastian Schindera; Anthony Seibert; Jay Starkey; Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam; Axel Wetter; Joachim E Wildberger; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-01-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.