Joyce Serebrenik1, Tao Wang2, Richard Hunte1, Sujatha Srinivasan3, Jessica McWalters4, Gregory K Tharp5, Steven E Bosinger5,6,7, Tina L Fiedler3, Jessica M Atrio8, Kerry Murphy4, Rebecca Barnett4, Laurie R Ray4, Meighan L Krows9, David N Fredricks3, Elizabeth Irungu10, Kenneth Ngure10, Nelly Mugo10, Jeanne Marrazzo11, Marla J Keller4, Betsy C Herold1,12. 1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. 3. Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. 5. Yerkes Genomics Core Laboratory, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 6. Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 7. Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. 9. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 10. Department of Medicine, Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya. 11. School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 12. Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) treatment failures and recurrences are common. To identify features associated with treatment response, we compared vaginal microbiota and host ectocervical transcriptome before and after oral metronidazole therapy. METHODS: Women with BV (Bronx, New York and Thika, Kenya) received 7 days of oral metronidazole at enrollment (day 0) and underwent genital tract sampling of microbiome (16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing), transcriptome (RNAseq), and immune mediator concentrations on day 0, 15, and 35. RESULTS: Bronx participants were more likely than Thika participants to clinically respond to metronidazole (19/20 vs 10/18, respectively, P = .0067) and by changes in microbiota composition and diversity. After dichotomizing the cohort into responders and nonresponders by change in α-diversity between day 35 and day 0, we identified that transcription differences associated with chemokine signaling (q = 0.002) and immune system process (q = 2.5 × 10-8) that differentiated responders from nonresponders were present at enrollment. Responders had significantly lower levels of CXCL9 in cervicovaginal lavage on day 0 (P < .007), and concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 increased significantly between day 0 and day 35 in responders vs nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Response to metronidazole is characterized by significant changes in chemokines and related transcripts, suggesting that treatments that promote these pathways may prove beneficial.
BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) treatment failures and recurrences are common. To identify features associated with treatment response, we compared vaginal microbiota and host ectocervical transcriptome before and after oral metronidazole therapy. METHODS: Women with BV (Bronx, New York and Thika, Kenya) received 7 days of oral metronidazole at enrollment (day 0) and underwent genital tract sampling of microbiome (16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing), transcriptome (RNAseq), and immune mediator concentrations on day 0, 15, and 35. RESULTS: Bronx participants were more likely than Thika participants to clinically respond to metronidazole (19/20 vs 10/18, respectively, P = .0067) and by changes in microbiota composition and diversity. After dichotomizing the cohort into responders and nonresponders by change in α-diversity between day 35 and day 0, we identified that transcription differences associated with chemokine signaling (q = 0.002) and immune system process (q = 2.5 × 10-8) that differentiated responders from nonresponders were present at enrollment. Responders had significantly lower levels of CXCL9 in cervicovaginal lavage on day 0 (P < .007), and concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 increased significantly between day 0 and day 35 in responders vs nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Response to metronidazole is characterized by significant changes in chemokines and related transcripts, suggesting that treatments that promote these pathways may prove beneficial.
Authors: Jacques Ravel; Pawel Gajer; Zaid Abdo; G Maria Schneider; Sara S K Koenig; Stacey L McCulle; Shara Karlebach; Reshma Gorle; Jennifer Russell; Carol O Tacket; Rebecca M Brotman; Catherine C Davis; Kevin Ault; Ligia Peralta; Larry J Forney Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lindi Masson; Jo-Ann S Passmore; Lenine J Liebenberg; Lise Werner; Cheryl Baxter; Kelly B Arnold; Carolyn Williamson; Francesca Little; Leila E Mansoor; Vivek Naranbhai; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Katharina Ronacher; Gerhard Walzl; Nigel J Garrett; Brent L Williams; Mara Couto-Rodriguez; Mady Hornig; W Ian Lipkin; Anneke Grobler; Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Marla J Keller; Lianna Wood; James M Billingsley; Laurie L Ray; Jessica Goymer; Shada Sinclair; Aileen P McGinn; Mark A Marzinke; Bruce Frank; Sujatha Srinivasan; Congzhou Liu; Jessica M Atrio; Lilia Espinoza; Nelly Mugo; Hans M L Spiegel; Peter L Anderson; David N Fredricks; Craig W Hendrix; Jeanne Marrazzo; Steven E Bosinger; Betsy C Herold Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Melis N Anahtar; Elizabeth H Byrne; Kathleen E Doherty; Brittany A Bowman; Hidemi S Yamamoto; Magali Soumillon; Nikita Padavattan; Nasreen Ismail; Amber Moodley; Mary E Sabatini; Musie S Ghebremichael; Chad Nusbaum; Curtis Huttenhower; Herbert W Virgin; Thumbi Ndung'u; Krista L Dong; Bruce D Walker; Raina N Fichorova; Douglas S Kwon Journal: Immunity Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Mandy A Cromwell; Angela Carville; Keith Mansfield; Sherry Klumpp; Susan V Westmoreland; Andrew A Lackner; R Paul Johnson Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.886
Authors: Sujatha Srinivasan; May A Beamer; Tina L Fiedler; Michele N Austin; Maria V Sizova; Susan M Strenk; Kathy J Agnew; G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery; Slava S Epstein; David N Fredricks; Sharon L Hillier Journal: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Jeny P Ghartey; Colleen Carpenter; Philip Gialanella; Charlotte Rising; Thomas C McAndrew; Mohak Mhatre; Jessica Tugetman; Mark H Einstein; Cynthia Chazotte; Betsy C Herold Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Marla J Keller; Rebecca P Madan; N Merna Torres; Melissa J Fazzari; Sylvia Cho; Sabah Kalyoussef; Gail Shust; Pedro M M Mesquita; Nicolette Louissaint; Jianmeng Chen; Hillel W Cohen; Erin C Diament; Anna C Lee; Lydia Soto-Torres; Craig W Hendrix; Betsy C Herold Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Craig R Cohen; Jairam R Lingappa; Jared M Baeten; Musa O Ngayo; Carol A Spiegel; Ting Hong; Deborah Donnell; Connie Celum; Saidi Kapiga; Sinead Delany; Elizabeth A Bukusi Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 11.069