Literature DB >> 34002009

PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer: interchangeability of 22C3 and 28-8 pharmDx assays for responses to immunotherapy.

Soomin Ahn1, Kyoung-Mee Kim2.   

Abstract

Recent clinical trials have shown the promising therapeutic effects of pembrolizumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Currently, the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) 22C3 pharmDx assay is the only companion diagnostic assay for assessing the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab. The purpose of this study was to compare 22C3 pharmDx and 28-8 pharmDx, a complementary diagnostic assay for nivolumab, in gastric cancer. In this study, 22C3 and 28-8 pharmDx assays were performed on the same formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of gastric adenocarcinoma clinical samples (n = 55). The concordance rate was evaluated using combined positive score (CPS) cutoffs of 1, 10, and 50. PD-L1 positivity with CPS ≥ 1 was 45.5% using the 22C3 pharmDx assay and 49.1% using the 28-8 pharmDx assay. At a CPS cutoff of 1, the overall percentage agreement was 96.4%. The positive and negative percentage agreements were 93.3% and 100%, respectively. All cases positive for PD-L1 using the 22C3 pharmDx assay were also positive using the 28-8 pharmDx assay. At a CPS cutoff of 10, the overall percentage agreement was 96.4%. At a CPS cutoff of 50, the two assays exhibited 100% concordance. Nonspecific cytoplasmic staining in the background tissues and tumor cells was often observed in the 28-8 pharmDx assay. When the results of the two assays were matched for response to immunotherapy, the overall response rate was higher in patients with a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 than in PD-L1-negative patients (22C3 pharmDx, P = 0.001; 28-8 pharmDx, P = 0.002). In conclusion, PD-L1 22C3 and 28-8 pharmDx assays were highly comparable at CPS cutoffs of 1, 10, and 50 in gastric cancer. These results provide evidence for the potential interchangeability of the two PD-L1 assays in gastric cancer.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34002009     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00823-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  14 in total

1.  PD-L1 immunohistochemistry comparison of 22C3 and 28-8 assays for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yukiya Narita; Eiichi Sasaki; Toshiki Masuishi; Hiroya Taniguchi; Shigenori Kadowaki; Seiji Ito; Yasushi Yatabe; Kei Muro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12

2.  Association of PD-L1 Expression and Other Variables With Benefit From Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 17 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Harry H Yoon; Zhaohui Jin; Oudom Kour; Lionel Aurelien Kankeu Fonkoua; Kohei Shitara; Michael K Gibson; Larry J Prokop; Markus Moehler; Yoon-Koo Kang; Qian Shi; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 33.006

3.  Reply to: Letter to editor on the article "Choice of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay influences clinical eligibility for gastric cancer immunotherapy".

Authors:  Joe Yeong; Chong Boon Teo; Ryan Yong Kiat Tay; Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan; Yiong Huak Chan; Elizabeth C Smyth; Raghav Sundar
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 7.701

4.  Choice of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay influences clinical eligibility for gastric cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Joe Yeong; Huey Yew Jeffrey Lum; Chong Boon Teo; Wei Peng Yong; Raghav Sundar; Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan; Yiong Huak Chan; Ryan Yong Kiat Tay; Joan Rou-En Choo; Anand D Jeyasekharan; Qing Hao Miow; Lit-Hsin Loo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 7.701

5.  Expression of CD274 mRNA Measured by qRT-PCR Correlates With PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry in Gastric and Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  So Young Kang; You Jeong Heo; Ghee Young Kwon; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer.

Authors:  C Röcken
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 7.  Immunotherapy in Gastro-Oesophageal Cancer: Current Practice and the Future of Personalised Therapy.

Authors:  Mary E Booth; Elizabeth C Smyth
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 7.744

8.  Integrative immune transcriptomic classification improves patient selection for precision immunotherapy in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Manuel Cabeza-Segura; Valentina Gambardella; Francisco Gimeno-Valiente; Juan Antonio Carbonell-Asins; Lorena Alarcón-Molero; Arturo González-Vilanova; Sheila Zuñiga-Trejos; Pilar Rentero-Garrido; Rosana Villagrasa; Mireia Gil; Ana Durá; Paula Richart; Noelia Alonso; Marisol Huerta; Susana Roselló; Desamparados Roda; Noelia Tarazona; Carolina Martínez-Ciarpaglini; Josefa Castillo; Andrés Cervantes; Tania Fleitas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 9.  Optimal First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus.

Authors:  Midhun Malla; Jacob Fuqua; Sarbajit Mukherjee; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-10-22

10.  High Frequency of Juxtamembrane Domain ERBB2 Mutation in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Sujin Park; Soomin Ahn; Deok Geun Kim; Hyunjin Kim; So Young Kang; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.