Literature DB >> 34001989

The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces.

Jungwon Lee1,2, Jun-Beom Lee2, Junseob Yun2, In-Chul Rhyu2, Yong-Moo Lee2, Sung-Mi Lee3,4, Min-Kyu Lee3, Byoungkook Kim5, Pangyu Kim5, Ki-Tae Koo6.   

Abstract

3D printing technology has been gradually applied to various areas. In the present study, 3D-printed implants were fabricated with direct metal laser sintering technique for a dental single root with titanium. The 3D implants were allocated into following groups: not treated (3D-None), sandblasted with a large grit and acid-etched (3D-SLA), and target-ion-induced plasma-sputtered surface (3D-TIPS). Two holes were drilled in each tibia of rabbit, and the three groups of implants were randomly placed with a mallet. Rabbits were sacrificed at two, four, and twelve weeks after the surgery. Histologic and histomorphometric analyses were performed for the evaluation of mineralized bone-to-implant contact (mBIC), osteoid-to-implant contact (OIC), total bone-to-implant contact (tBIC), mineralized bone area fraction occupancy (mBAFO), osteoid area fraction occupancy (OAFO), and total bone area fraction occupancy (tBAFO) in the inner and outer areas of lattice structure. At two weeks, 3D-TIPS showed significantly higher inner and outer tBIC and inner tBAFO compared with other groups. At four weeks, 3D-TIPS showed significantly higher outer OIC than 3D-SLA, but there were no significant differences in other variables. At twelve weeks, there were no significant differences. The surface treatment with TIPS in 3D-printed implants could enhance the osseointegration process in the rabbit tibia model, meaning that earlier osseointegration could be achieved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34001989     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89961-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  3 in total

1.  Wetting behavior of dental implants.

Authors:  Frank Rupp; Lutz Scheideler; Mirjam Eichler; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Application of Plasma Sprayed Zirconia Coating in Dental Implant: Study in Implant.

Authors:  Zhengfei Huang; Zhifeng Wang; Chuanhua Li; Kaifeng Yin; Dan Hao; Jing Lan
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types.

Authors:  Sean S Kohles; Melissa B Clark; Christopher A Brown; James N Kenealy
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study.

Authors:  Jungwon Lee; Ling Li; Hyun-Young Song; Min-Jung Son; Yong-Moo Lee; Ki-Tae Koo
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.