Literature DB >> 34000291

Attentional processes during emotional face perception in social anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking findings.

Vivien Günther1, Adam Kropidlowski1, Frank Martin Schmidt2, Katja Koelkebeck3, Anette Kersting1, Thomas Suslow4.   

Abstract

Background In recent years, a growing body of eye-tracking research has investigated gaze behavior in individuals with social anxiety during the visual perception of emotional stimuli. The aim of this article was to review and synthesize studies examining attention orientation in patients with clinical social anxiety by means of eye-tracking methodology. Methods Through a systematic search, 30 articles were identified, including 11 studies in which single emotional faces were used as stimuli and seven eligible studies in which threatening faces were paired with neutral stimuli. Meta-analyses were conducted to compare prolonged eye-contact behavior and early attentional biases to threats in individuals with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and healthy controls. Results Moderate group differences were revealed for single face viewing studies, with SAD patients showing significantly reduced eye contact with negative (Hedges' g = -0.67) and positive emotional faces (g = -0.49) compared to that of healthy participants. Type of task and duration of stimulus presentation were (marginally) significant moderators of between-study variance in effect size. Small but significant group differences were found for early attentional biases toward angry faces versus neutral stimuli (g = 0.21) but not toward happy faces versus neutral stimuli (g = 0.05). Preliminary evidence for a hyperscanning strategy in SAD patients relative to healthy controls emerged (g = 0.42). Limitations The number of included studies with face pairings was low, and two studies were excluded due to unavailable data. Conclusions Our results suggest that eye contact avoidance with emotional faces is a prominent feature in SAD patients. Patients might benefit from guidance to learn to make adequate eye contact during therapeutic interventions, such as exposure therapy. SAD patients demonstrated slightly heightened attention allocation toward angry faces relative to that of healthy participants during early processing stages. Threat biases can be potential targets for attention modification training as an adjuvant to other treatments. Future research on early attentional processes may benefit from improved arrangements of paired stimuli to increase the psychometric properties of initial attention indices.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional bias; Eye contact; Face processing; Gaze behavior; Social anxiety; Vigilance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34000291     DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0278-5846            Impact factor:   5.067


  4 in total

1.  Impact of Face Masks and Viewers' Anxiety on Ratings of First Impressions from Faces.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Alexander Hare; Chang Hong Liu
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Perceiving the Self and Emotions with an Anxious Mind: Evidence from an Implicit Perceptual Task.

Authors:  Michella Feldborg; Naomi A Lee; Kalai Hung; Kaiping Peng; Jie Sui
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Eye-Tracking Studies of Construction Safety.

Authors:  Baoquan Cheng; Xiaowei Luo; Xiang Mei; Huihua Chen; Jianling Huang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Experiences of maltreatment in childhood and attention to facial emotions in healthy young women.

Authors:  Dennis Hoepfel; Vivien Günther; Anna Bujanow; Anette Kersting; Charlott Maria Bodenschatz; Thomas Suslow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.