Literature DB >> 33999938

Characterization of oral swab samples for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Rachel C Wood1, Alfred Andama2,3, Gleda Hermansky4, Stephen Burkot5, Lucy Asege2, Mukwatamundu Job2, David Katumba2, Martha Nakaye2, Sandra Z Mwebe2, Jerry Mulondo2, Christine M Bachman5, Kevin P Nichols4, Anne-Laure M Le Ny4, Corrie Ortega4, Rita N Olson1, Kris M Weigel1, Alaina M Olson1, Damian Madan4, David Bell5, Adithya Cattamanchi6, William Worodria2,3, Fred C Semitala2,3, Akos Somoskovi5, Gerard A Cangelosi1, Kyle J Minch4.   

Abstract

Oral swab analysis (OSA) has been shown to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) DNA in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). In previous analyses, qPCR testing of swab samples collected from tongue dorsa was up to 93% sensitive relative to sputum GeneXpert, when 2 swabs per patient were tested. The present study modified sample collection methods to increase sample biomass and characterized the viability of bacilli present in tongue swabs. A qPCR targeting conserved bacterial ribosomal rRNA gene (rDNA) sequences was used to quantify bacterial biomass in samples. There was no detectable reduction in total bacterial rDNA signal over the course of 10 rapidly repeated tongue samplings, indicating that swabs collect only a small portion of the biomass available for testing. Copan FLOQSwabs collected ~2-fold more biomass than Puritan PurFlock swabs, the best brand used previously (p = 0.006). FLOQSwabs were therefore evaluated in patients with possible TB in Uganda. A FLOQSwab was collected from each patient upon enrollment (Day 1) and, in a subset of sputum GeneXpert Ultra-positive patients, a second swab was collected on the following day (Day 2). Swabs were tested for MTB DNA by manual IS6110-targeted qPCR. Relative to sputum GeneXpert Ultra, single-swab sensitivity was 88% (44/50) on Day 1 and 94.4% (17/18) on Day 2. Specificity was 79.2% (42/53). Among an expanded sample of Ugandan patients, 62% (87/141) had colony-forming bacilli in their tongue dorsum swab samples. These findings will help guide further development of this promising TB screening method.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33999938     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  8 in total

1.  Accuracy of Tongue Swab Testing Using Xpert MTB-RIF Ultra for Tuberculosis Diagnosis.

Authors:  A Andama; G R Whitman; R Crowder; T F Reza; D Jaganath; J Mulondo; T K Nalugwa; F C Semitala; W Worodria; C Cook; R C Wood; K M Weigel; A M Olson; J Lohmiller Shaw; M Kato-Maeda; C M Denkinger; P Nahid; G A Cangelosi; A Cattamanchi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.677

2.  Complementary Nonsputum Diagnostic Testing for Tuberculosis in People with HIV Using Oral Swab PCR and Urine Lipoarabinomannan Detection.

Authors:  Adrienne E Shapiro; Alaina M Olson; Lara Kidoguchi; Xin Niu; Zinhle Ngcobo; Zanele P Magcaba; Mduduzi W Ngwane; Grant R Whitman; Kris M Weigel; Rachel C Wood; Doug P K Wilson; Paul K Drain; Gerard A Cangelosi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.677

3.  Gene-Based Diagnosis of Tuberculosis from Oral Swabs with a New Generation Pathogen Enrichment Technique.

Authors:  Young Ae Kang; Bonhan Koo; Yong Shin; Sei Won Lee; Ock-Hwa Kim; Joung Ha Park; Ho Cheol Kim; Hyo Joo Lee; Myoung Gyu Kim; Youngwon Jang; Na Hyun Kim; Yong Seo Koo; Sung-Han Kim
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  Diagnostic performance of oral swabs for non-sputum based TB diagnosis in a TB/HIV endemic setting.

Authors:  Sylvia M LaCourse; Evans Seko; Rachel Wood; Wilfred Bundi; Gregory S Ouma; Janet Agaya; Barbra A Richardson; Grace John-Stewart; Steve Wandiga; Gerard A Cangelosi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Diagnostic performance of oral swab specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection with rapid point-of-care lateral flow antigen test.

Authors:  Arati Mane; Shilpa Jain; Ankita Jain; Michael Pereira; Atul Sirsat; Gaurav Pathak; Vikalp Bhoi; Shailaja Bhavsar; Samiran Panda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Diagnosing Tuberculosis: What Do New Technologies Allow Us to (Not) Do?

Authors:  Shima M Abdulgader; Anna O Okunola; Gcobisa Ndlangalavu; Byron W P Reeve; Brian W Allwood; Coenraad F N Koegelenberg; Rob M Warren; Grant Theron
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA in oronasal swabs from infected African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer).

Authors:  Charlene Clarke; David V Cooper; Michele A Miller; Wynand J Goosen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Reimagining the status quo: How close are we to rapid sputum-free tuberculosis diagnostics for all?

Authors:  Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana; Alberto L Garcia-Basteiro; Morten Ruhwald; Frank Cobelens; Grant Theron
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.