Literature DB >> 33999760

Optimising response rates in a national postal survey evaluating community mental health care: four interventions trialled.

Tiffany Gooden1, Alison Wright1, Eliza Swinn1, Steve Sizmur1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Community Mental Health Survey (CMHS) is a valuable resource of information on experiences of mental health care in England; however, response rates are declining. AIM: To increase the overall response rate and response rate of young adult service users.
METHODS: Four interventions were trialled in a randomised controlled study design alongside the 2017 CMHS. The questionnaire and information letters were modified based on an established framework for influencing behaviour. The modified materials plus a pre-notification card were tested to increase the overall response rate, identified by one-sided z-tests between the intervention and control groups. An information flyer was modified to target service users age 18 to 35, tested using multilevel logistic regression.
RESULTS: The overall response rate significantly increased with the modified information letters compared to the control (29.1% vs. 25.1%; p = 0.007). The targeted information flyer did not increase responses from younger service users; though the combination of modified information letters and questionnaire did (24.6% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Modifying information letters based on the easy, attractive, social and timely (EAST) framework can increase response rate in postal surveys evaluating community mental health care. Modified letters combined with a modified questionnaire can increase the response from younger service users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community mental health; evaluating mental health care; experiences of care; national surveys; patient-centred care; response rates; service user feedback

Year:  2021        PMID: 33999760     DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1922646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health        ISSN: 0963-8237


  2 in total

1.  Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Woolf; Phil Edwards
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Diabetes self-management during the COVID-19 pandemic and its associations with COVID-19 anxiety syndrome, depression and health anxiety.

Authors:  Walter Distaso; Mohammad M A H Malik; Saba Semere; Amal AlHakami; Emma C Alexander; Dhruti Hirani; Ronak J Shah; Kinga Suba; Vicky McKechnie; Ana Nikčević; Nick Oliver; Marcantonio Spada; Victoria Salem
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.213

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.