Literature DB >> 33999545

Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction.

Etienne Puymirat1, Guillaume Cayla1, Tabassome Simon1, Philippe G Steg1, Gilles Montalescot1, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski1, Alicia le Bras1, Romain Gallet1, Khalife Khalife1, Jean-François Morelle1, Pascal Motreff1, Gilles Lemesle1, Jean-Guillaume Dillinger1, Thibault Lhermusier1, Johanne Silvain1, Vincent Roule1, Jean-Noel Labèque1, Grégoire Rangé1, Grégory Ducrocq1, Yves Cottin1, Didier Blanchard1, Anaïs Charles Nelson1, Bernard De Bruyne1, Gilles Chatellier1, Nicolas Danchin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have multivessel disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for nonculprit lesions (complete revascularization) is superior to treatment of the culprit lesion alone. However, whether complete revascularization that is guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is superior to an angiography-guided procedure is unclear.
METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients with STEMI and multivessel disease who had undergone successful PCI of the infarct-related artery to receive complete revascularization guided by either FFR or angiography. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization at 1 year.
RESULTS: The mean (±SD) number of stents that were placed per patient for nonculprit lesions was 1.01±0.99 in the FFR-guided group and 1.50±0.86 in the angiography-guided group. During follow-up, a primary outcome event occurred in 32 of 586 patients (5.5%) in the FFR-guided group and in 24 of 577 patients (4.2%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 2.23; P = 0.31). Death occurred in 9 patients (1.5%) in the FFR-guided group and in 10 (1.7%) in the angiography-guided group; nonfatal myocardial infarction in 18 (3.1%) and 10 (1.7%), respectively; and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization in 15 (2.6%) and 11 (1.9%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI undergoing complete revascularization, an FFR-guided strategy did not have a significant benefit over an angiography-guided strategy with respect to the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 1 year. However, given the wide confidence intervals for the estimate of effect, the findings do not allow for a conclusive interpretation. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and Abbott; FLOWER-MI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02943954.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33999545     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  26 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kawase; Hitoshi Matsuo; Shoichi Kuramitsu; Yasutsugu Shiono; Takashi Akasaka; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Tetsuya Amano; Ken Kozuma; Masato Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yoshio Kobayashi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-05-11

2.  Different types of Kounis syndrome caused by different episodes of bee sting anaphylaxis: Misfortunes never come singly.

Authors:  Kotaro Tsuruta; Kensuke Yokoi; Goro Yoshioka; Wenhann Chen; Kota Jojima; Hiroshi Hongo; Masahiro Natsuaki; Shinjo Sonoda; Nicholas G Kounis; Koichi Node
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2022-03-26

3.  Complete Revascularization vs Culprit Lesion-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Angina-Related Quality of Life in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From the COMPLETE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shamir R Mehta; Jia Wang; David A Wood; John A Spertus; David J Cohen; Roxana Mehran; Robert F Storey; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri; Tej Sheth; Kevin R Bainey; Sripal Bangalore; Warren J Cantor; David P Faxon; Laurent J Feldman; Sanjit S Jolly; Vijay Kunadian; Shahar Lavi; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Mina Madan; Raul Moreno; Sunil V Rao; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Goran Stankovic; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; John A Cairns
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 30.154

Review 4.  Evolving concepts of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque and the vulnerable patient: implications for patient care and future research.

Authors:  Prakriti Gaba; Bernard J Gersh; James Muller; Jagat Narula; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 49.421

Review 5.  Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease.

Authors:  Murtaza Bharmal; Morton J Kern; Gautam Kumar; Arnold H Seto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 6.  Invasive and non-invasive assessment of ischaemia in chronic coronary syndromes: translating pathophysiology to clinical practice.

Authors:  Ozan M Demir; Haseeb Rahman; Tim P van de Hoef; Javier Escaned; Jan J Piek; Sven Plein; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  A real-world comparison of outcomes between fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Christopher C Y Wong; Austin C C Ng; Cuneyt Ada; Vincent Chow; William F Fearon; Martin K C Ng; Leonard Kritharides; Andy S C Yong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  FLOWER-MI and the root of the problem with non-culprit revascularisation.

Authors:  Matthew E Li Kam Wa; Kalpa De Silva; Carlos Collet; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-11

Review 9.  CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) update 2022.

Authors:  Yukio Ozaki; Hironori Hara; Yoshinobu Onuma; Yuki Katagiri; Tetsuya Amano; Yoshio Kobayashi; Takashi Muramatsu; Hideki Ishii; Ken Kozuma; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hitoshi Matsuo; Shiro Uemura; Kazushige Kadota; Yutaka Hikichi; Kenichi Tsujita; Junya Ako; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Yoshihiro Morino; Ichiro Hamanaka; Nobuo Shiode; Junya Shite; Junko Honye; Tetsuo Matsubara; Kazuya Kawai; Yasumi Igarashi; Atsunori Okamura; Takayuki Ogawa; Yoshisato Shibata; Takafumi Tsuji; Junji Yajima; Kaoru Iwabuchi; Nobuo Komatsu; Teruyasu Sugano; Masaru Yamaki; Shinichiro Yamada; Hiroaki Hirase; Yuusuke Miyashita; Fuminobu Yoshimachi; Masakazu Kobayashi; Jiro Aoki; Hirotaka Oda; Yoshiaki Katahira; Kinzo Ueda; Masami Nishino; Koichi Nakao; Ichiro Michishita; Takafumi Ueno; Taku Inohara; Shun Kohsaka; Tevfik F Ismail; Patrick W Serruys; Masato Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-01-12

Review 10.  Virtual (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve: Future Role in Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  Hazel Arfah Haley; Mina Ghobrial; Paul D Morris; Rebecca Gosling; Gareth Williams; Mark T Mills; Tom Newman; Vignesh Rammohan; Giulia Pederzani; Patricia V Lawford; Rodney Hose; Julian P Gunn
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.