Literature DB >> 33999503

Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three-arm pilot trial.

Akiko Higashihara1, Shigeko Horiuchi2.   

Abstract

AIMS: We conducted a pilot trial to compare the effects of smoke and smokeless moxibustion with a control as a possible supplement to external cephalic version (ECV) for converting breech to cephalic presentation and increasing adherence to cephalic position, and to assess their effects on the well-being of the mother and child.
METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental design with 3 arms: a smoke moxibustion (SM) (n = 20) and smokeless moxibustion (SLM) (n = 20) groups (20-min acupoint BL67 stimulation once or twice daily for 10-14 days), and a control group (n = 20). The participants had singleton breech presentations between 33 and 35 gestation weeks. The primary outcome was cephalic presentation at the conclusion of intervention. The secondary outcomes were cephalic presentation at birth and effects on mother and child well-being.
RESULTS: At the conclusion of intervention, cephalic presentation was higher in the SLM (60.0%) than the control groups (25.0%), Relative Risk 2.40, 95% Confidence Interval [1.04-5.56]; there was no significant difference for SM. At birth, there were no significant differences in cephalic presentation or well-being.
CONCLUSION: SLM treatment showed an increasing trend towards cephalic presentation at the conclusion of intervention. Although significant differences were not observed at birth possibly due to the small samples and non-randomization, moxibustion was safe, and not associated with perinatal morbidity and mortality. A randomized controlled trial with a larger sample is warranted to ascertain SLM treatment as a possible ECV supplement for converting and increasing adherence to cephalic position.
© 2021 The Authors. Japan Journal of Nursing Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Academy of Nursing Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breech presentation; moxibustion; pilot trial; quasi-experimental study

Year:  2021        PMID: 33999503     DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Nurs Sci        ISSN: 1742-7924            Impact factor:   1.418


  1 in total

Review 1.  A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questions and Hypotheses in Scholarly Articles.

Authors:  Edward Barroga; Glafera Janet Matanguihan
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.153

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.