Literature DB >> 33997801

A qualitative IgG ELISA for detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in Syrian hamster serum samples.

Anita Shete1, Sreelekshmy Mohandas1, Rajlaxmi Jain1, Pragya D Yadav1.   

Abstract

This protocol describes an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for qualitative detection of IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Syrian hamster serum samples. We describe the preparation of inactivated virus antigens and the negative control antigen and the use of antigen-coated microtiter plates to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies from SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters, including the criteria for differentiating positive versus negative reaction. The limited batch-to-batch variability of this assay has been verified with two batches of independently prepared antigens. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Mohandas et al. (2021).
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibody; Immunology; Microbiology; Model Organisms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33997801      PMCID: PMC8108381          DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  STAR Protoc        ISSN: 2666-1667


Before you begin

Ethics statement

The present protocol was approved by Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of ICMR NIV, Pune and all the experiments involving animals were performed as per guidelines laid down by Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on animals, Government of India. Prepare virus stock antigens, gamma irradiation, and confirm inactivation of the virus stock as described below. Prepare Solutions following the recipes mentioned in the Materials and Equipment section. A complete list of reagents and resources required is given in the Key resources table.

SARS-CoV-2 stock preparation

Timing: 5 days Maintain African green monkey kidney cell line (Vero CCL-81) in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 mg/mL) Infect the cells with SARS-CoV-2 isolate (Sarkale et al., 2020). GISAID:EPI_ISL_420545 Infect the Vero CCL-81 cells (at 80%–90% confluency, in 40 mL MEM, cultured in 225 cm2 tissue culture flasks) with 1 mL virus isolate with Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID50) of 106.5/mL. Incubate in a CO2 incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 4 days (Reed and Muench, 1938). On day 4 post inoculation, observe for the presence of cytopathic effects (CPE; Figure 1).
Figure 1

Cytopathic effect of the SARS-CoV-2 isolate demonstrated in Vero CCL-81 cells

(A) Cell control: No cellular changes were observed in the cell control and (B) Post infection day- 4(PID-4): Vero CCL-81 cells that were inoculated with the samples showed evidence of cell rounding. Syncytial cells formed large cell masses that increased in size and number as the infection progressed. Scale bars: 71.36 μm.

Cytopathic effect of the SARS-CoV-2 isolate demonstrated in Vero CCL-81 cells (A) Cell control: No cellular changes were observed in the cell control and (B) Post infection day- 4(PID-4): Vero CCL-81 cells that were inoculated with the samples showed evidence of cell rounding. Syncytial cells formed large cell masses that increased in size and number as the infection progressed. Scale bars: 71.36 μm. Freeze the whole flask in −80°C, and then thaw it and harvest the entire volume of the tissue culture fluid (TCF; the supernatant from the culture) Centrifuge the TCF at 2490 g for 5 min at 4°C After centrifugation, separate and store the clear supernatant at −80°C until further use. This is referred to as virus stock hereafter. Proceed to Gamma irradiation of the stock as described below Preparation of the negative control antigen Incubate Vero CCL-81 cells in a CO2 incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 4 days Repeat steps 2b–2e to prepare the negative control antigen stock Proceed to Gamma irradiation of the stock as described below

Gamma irradiation

Timing: 1 day Gamma inactivation of virus stock and Vero CCL-81 control supernatant. Thaw the virus or the negative control antigen stock and place it on ice in a biohazard bag in the steel container of the gamma chamber Use a Co-60 source (Gamma Chamber; GC 5000) with a total radiation dose of 8 kiloGray (kGy) for inactivation of SARS-CoV-2, which can be achieved by exposing to gamma dose rate of 6.89 kGy for 1 h 4 min

Confirmation of inactivation

Timing: 10 days Inoculate 100 μL of the irradiated virus stock in Vero CCL-81 cells and observe for 5 days (P1 passage). Inoculate 100 μL supernatant of P1 passage in Vero CCL-81 cells and observe for 5 days (P2 passage) to confirm the inactivation of the virus by checking for absence of CPE.

Concentration of the antigen

Timing: 1 day Add 60 mL of the inactivated antigen in sample reservoir of the Jumbosep centrifugal devices with 30K membrane insert. Centrifuge for 12 min at 177 g at 4°C. After centrifugation discard the filtrate collected in the filtrate receiver. Collect approximately 35 mL of the sample retained (now referred as concentrated antigen) in the sample reservoir in a pre-chilled bottle. Aliquot the concentrated antigen 1 mL/vial and store at −80°C for further use. Similarly, for preparation of concentrated negative control antigen, add 60 mL the control supernatant of Vero CCL-81 cells in separate Jumbosep centrifugal devices with 30K membrane insert and repeat steps 7–10. Estimate the total protein concentration by the Lowry’s method (Lowry et al., 1951). CRITICAL: Two separate Jumbosep centrifugal devices should be used for SARS-CoV-2 and negative control antigen preparation, respectively.

Key resources table

Materials and equipment

In this protocol, an Inverted Compound Microscope with camera attachment was used. However, any inverted compound microscope could be used to record the image. Preparation of wash buffer (1× PBST) One tablet dissolved in 200 mL of deionized water yields 0.01 M phosphate buffer. Once prepared store for one week at 4°C . Preparation of sample diluent (5% skim milk) Prepare freshly do not store Preparation of stop solution Add 7.142 mL of Concentrated H 2 SO 4 in 250 mL chilled distilled water. Mix thoroughly and then store for one month at 4°C . CRITICAL: Reagents should be used within the expiry. All the reagents should be opened in aseptic conditions. Wear protective gloves, clothing, and eye and face protection. Wash hands thoroughly after handling Sulfuric acid. Conjugate diluent (Stablizyme) can be replaced by the sample diluent at step number 8.

Step-by-step method details

Coating of microtiter plates

Timing: 1 day Dilute the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 antigen to make a concentration of 2 μg/100 μL with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.2 to 7.4, 0.01 M). Coat 96-well polystyrene microtiter ELISA plates with 100 μl of the diluted SARS-CoV-2 antigen per well in rows A to D and the negative control antigen in rows E to H Keep the antigen-coated plates for 16–18 h at 4°C. After coating, block the wells with liquid plate sealer for two hours at room temperature (25°C–30°C). Aspirate and store the plate at 2°C–8 °C. Wash the plates three times before use with 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.2–7.4 with 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST). CRITICAL: It is important to check the pH of the coating buffer.

Assay protocol

Timing: 2 h 30 min Prepare positive and negative controls for the assay Blood collection from hamsters: Anaesthetize the hamsters prior to blood collection using isoflurane. Perform blood collection (0.25 mL) through retroorbital route. Allow the blood sample to clot at room temperature for 30 min and centrifuge the sample at 177 g for 10 min to separate serum. Aliquot the separated serum and store it at −20°C. Collect positive serum from hamsters infected by SARS-CoV-2 virus and negative control serum from uninfected hamsters. (Mohandas et al., 2021) Dilute hamster IgG positive and negative serum samples to be tested prior to initiating the test. Dilute the hamster sera to 1:100 with the sample diluent. Add 100 μl of 1:100 diluted serum samples to the coated microtiter plate and incubate at 37°C for one hour. After incubation, wash the plates three times with PBST. Add 100 μl of anti-hamster IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP; 1:3000 diluted with stabilzyme) per well and incubate the plate for one hour at 37°C. CRITICAL: It is important to confirm the dilutions of the serum samples and conjugated antibodies After incubation, wash the plates three times with PBST. Add 100 μl of 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate per well and incubate for 10 min at 25°C–28°C. Follow the exact incubation time. Stop the reaction using 2M sulfuric acid. Measure the absorbance values at 450 nm using an ELISA reader. Determination of cut-off value for the assay is as follows. Sample is considered to be positive if optical Density (O.D) of the sample is more than the average O.D of negative control + 0.2 and OD of sample with positive antigen divided by OD of sample with negative antigen.>1.5. Sample is considered to be negative if O.D of the sample is less than the average O.D of negative control +0.2 and the ratio of OD of sample with positive antigen divided by OD of sample with negative antigen. <1.5.

Expected outcomes

This protocol allows qualitative detection of anti-SARS CoV-2 IgG antibodies in hamster serum samples. In our recent paper (Mohandas et al., 2021), we have applied this IgG ELISA for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in Syrian hamster serum samples. Three vaccine formulations were evaluated in this study. Serum IgG titers were also determined using this assay by testing 10-fold serial dilutions of each serum sample, starting from 1:100 dilution. Titer values were determined at the highest dilution when the optical density (OD) was more than 0.2 and positive/negative (P/N) ratio above 1.5. Robust anti SARS CoV-2 IgG antibody response was detected in this study against vaccine candidates with an increasing trend of OD of 0.84, 0.97, and 0.91 on 3, 7, and 15 days post infection, respectively (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Humoral response in vaccinated hamsters

(A) IgG antibody response during a three-dose vaccine regime in all groups of animals observed from 12, 21 and 48 day post immunization.

(B) IgG antibody response at post-infection ( 3, 7 and 15 Days post infection[DPI]) for all groups of animals.

(C) Comparison of IgG antibody titers between groups post immunization.

(D) Comparison of IgG antibody titers between groups post-infection. The statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test between the two groups; p values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Source: page 5 of Mohandas et al. (2021).

Humoral response in vaccinated hamsters (A) IgG antibody response during a three-dose vaccine regime in all groups of animals observed from 12, 21 and 48 day post immunization. (B) IgG antibody response at post-infection ( 3, 7 and 15 Days post infection[DPI]) for all groups of animals. (C) Comparison of IgG antibody titers between groups post immunization. (D) Comparison of IgG antibody titers between groups post-infection. The statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test between the two groups; p values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Source: page 5 of Mohandas et al. (2021). Reproducibility of the assay has been checked using two different batches of the independently prepared concentrated antigens (Lot 4 vs Lot 7), and the results from the weak positive sera and the negative controls were found to be comparable between these two trials (Figure 3; Table 1).
Figure 3

Reproducibility of the assay using two different lots of antigens

Weak positive hamster sera (positive control, PC; n=1) and negative control sera (NC, n=2), and one blank control (BC, n = 1) were used and assay was performed as per the protocol, using two different batches of positive antigens (Lot 4 and Lot 7).

Table 1

Verification of batch-to-batch variability

OD (450 nm)Sample details
Positive antigen0.3640.385Ham-13 Day-10PC
0.0710.065Ham-1 Day-3NC1
0.0750.068Ham-3 Day-3NC2
0.10.088BlankBC
Negative antigen0.0810.07Ham-13 Day-10PC
0.0690.065Ham-1 Day-3NC1
0.0750.064Ham-3 Day-3NC2
0.0730.088BlankBC
Plate coated dateOctober.7, 2020Feb. 9, 2021
Concentrated supernatant Lot no47
P/N4.495.5
1.021
11.06
1.361
Avg NC0.0730.0665
Cut off0.2730.267

ELISA plates were coated with two different batches of antigens (concentrated supernatant; lot number 4 and 7). PC: positive control (weak positive hamster sera). NC1 and NC2: negative control sera 1 and 2. BC: blank control.

Reproducibility of the assay using two different lots of antigens Weak positive hamster sera (positive control, PC; n=1) and negative control sera (NC, n=2), and one blank control (BC, n = 1) were used and assay was performed as per the protocol, using two different batches of positive antigens (Lot 4 and Lot 7). Verification of batch-to-batch variability ELISA plates were coated with two different batches of antigens (concentrated supernatant; lot number 4 and 7). PC: positive control (weak positive hamster sera). NC1 and NC2: negative control sera 1 and 2. BC: blank control.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Average NC is calculated by taking mean OD of two or more negative controls Avg of NC = [O.D of NC 1 (0.071)+ O.D of NC 2(0.075)]/2 = 0.073 P/N is calculated as OD of sample with positive antigen divided by OD of sample with negative antigen. O.D of Sample with SARS CoV-2 antigen (0.364)/ O.D of sample with negative control antigen (0.081) = 4.49 Cut Off OD is determined as 0.2 added to average NC Cut off= Avg NC (0.073)+0.2 = 0.273 Sample is considered positive if both the following criteria are met: OD of the sample is more than cut off P/N of the sample is more than 1.5. Ham-13 Day-10 is considered as positive as O.D is 0.364 which is > cut off (0.273) and P/N is 4.49 which is >1.5

Limitations

It is an indirect IgG ELISA. The assay has been validated using the limited number of SARS CoV-2 infected Syrian hamsters (Mohandas et al., 2021). The performance of the assay has not been optimized for visual determination. We have not tested the assay with other species of hamsters. We speculate that there may not be cross reactivity of the Goat anti-hamster IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to other hamsters than Syrian hamsters

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

No color development (steps 7 and 8) Reason 1: Improper washing of the antigen coated plates before sample addition. Reason 2: Loss of activity of the conjugate. Reason 3: Omission of key reagents

Potential solution

Solution 1: Wash the plate three times with wash buffer before sample addition. Solution 2: In a glass tube, add 20 μL of conjugate and 20 μL of liquid TMB substrate and check for color development. Solution 3: Check that all reagents have been added in the correct order

Problem 2 (step 12)

Low optical density (OD) value of “Positive control” Reason: OD taken at incorrect wavelength. Read OD values at 450 nm.

Problem 3

High OD values of “Negative control” (step 7). Reason : Improper washing of the antigen coated plates before sample addition. Solution 1: Follow the protocol meticulously. Solution 2: Change micropipette tips while addition of negative and positive control.

Problem 4

High background (step 10). Reason 1: Liquid substrate not properly protected from light. Reason 2: Contamination of liquid Substrate Reason 3: Insufficient washing of the plates. Reason 4: Poor quality of water used for diluting wash buffer concentrate Solution 1: Incubate the plate in dark after addition of substrate. Solution 2: Check OD value of substrate blank. Solution 3: Follow wash protocol meticulously Solution 4: Glass distilled water is preferred for diluting wash buffer concentrate

Problem 5

Poor reproducibility of test (step 1 and 7). Reason 1: Uneven coating of the plate Reason 2: Dispensing errors Reason 3: Improper washing Solution 1: Use proper ELISA plate; check coating and blocking volumes Solution 2: Calibrate micropipettes. Check other dispensing equipment’s. Solution 3: If an automated plate washer is used, check all the ports/manifold for uniform flow of wash buffer. If there are blockages, clean the ports

Problem 6

Uneven color development (step 7). Reason: Improper washing of wells Use an automated plate washer, if available.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Dr Pragya D Yadav (hellopragya22@gmail.com).

Materials availability

All the newly generated materials associated with this protocol will be available, on request to Director, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, subject to fulfillment of institutional criteria for sharing.

Data and code availability

The datasets supporting the current study have not been deposited in a public repository but are available from the corresponding author on request.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Goat anti-hamster IgG horseradish peroxidaseThermo Fisher ScientificCat# PA1-29626

Bacterial and virus strains

NIV-2020-770ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune“GISAID: hCoV-19/India/770/ 2020 |EPI_ISL_420545|”“GISAID: hCoV19/India/2020 770/2020|EPI_ISL_420546|”

Biological samples

Hamster SARS-CoV-2-positive serum samplesICMR-National Institute of Virology, PuneN/A
Hamster SARS-CoV-2-negative serum samplesICMR-National Institute of Virology, PuneN/A

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Minimum Essential MediumThermo Fisher ScientificCat # 11534466
Fetal bovine serumSigma, USACat # F9665
Penicillin streptomycinHiMediaCat # A018
Liquid plate sealerCANDOR Bioscience GmbH, GermanyCat # 160902-04
PBSSigma-Aldrich, USACat #P4417-100TAB
Tween-20Sigma-Aldrich, USACat #P1379-500ML
StabilZyme HRP Conjugate StabilizerSurModics, Inc., USACat # SZ02-1000
3,3’,5,5’-TetramethylbenzidineClinical SciencesCat# 01016-1-1000
Sample diluent powder (skim milk)Sigma-Aldrich, USACat# 70166-500G
Sulfuric acidSigma-Aldrich, USACat # 7664-93-9

Experimental models: Cell lines

Vero CCL-81ATCCCat#ATCC-CCL-81

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

Syrian hamster 6–8-week-old femaleIndian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, IndiaN/A

Others

ELISA platesNunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USACat# 469949
Jumbosep Centrifugal Device Membrane Inserts 30KPallCat # OD030C65
Inverted compound microscopeOlympusModel: CK2
Biosafety CabinetThermo ScientificModel: 1376
ELISA readerMolecular DevicesModel: Versamax microplate reader
ELISA microplate washerBio-RadModel: 1575
Co-60 source (Gamma Chamber)Board of Radiation & Isotope Technology, Mumbai (BRIT)GC 5000)
IncubatorREMICI-10S

Preparation of wash buffer (1× PBST)

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
PBS tablet0.01MOne tablet in 200 mL deionized water
Tween 200.1%200 μL

One tablet dissolved in 200 mL of deionized water yields 0.01 M phosphate buffer. Once prepared store for one week at 4°C .

Preparation of sample diluent (5% skim milk)

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
Skim milk5%5 gm of Skim milk in 100 mL 1×PBST

Prepare freshly do not store

Preparation of stop solution

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
Concentrated H2SO42M7.142 mL
Chilled distilled water-250 mL
  3 in total

1.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  First isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India.

Authors:  Prasad Sarkale; Savita Patil; Pragya D Yadav; Dimpal A Nyayanit; Gajanan Sapkal; Shrikant Baradkar; Rajen Lakra; Anita Shete-Aich; Sharda Prasad; Atanu Basu; Lalit Dar; Veena Vipat; Sidhartha Giri; Varsha Potdar; Manohar Lal Choudhary; Ira Praharaj; Amita Jain; Bharati Malhotra; Pranita Gawande; Kaumudi Kalele; Nivedita Gupta; Sarah S Cherian; Priya Abraham
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2020 Feb & Mar       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of BBV152, whole virion inactivated SARS- CoV-2 vaccine candidates in the Syrian hamster model.

Authors:  Sreelekshmy Mohandas; Pragya D Yadav; Anita Shete-Aich; Priya Abraham; Krishna Mohan Vadrevu; Gajanan Sapkal; Chandrashekhar Mote; Dimpal Nyayanit; Nivedita Gupta; Vellimedu Kannappa Srinivas; Manoj Kadam; Abhimanyu Kumar; Triparna Majumdar; Rajlaxmi Jain; Gururaj Deshpande; Savita Patil; Prasad Sarkale; Deepak Patil; Raches Ella; Sai D Prasad; Sharda Sharma; Krishna M Ella; Samiran Panda; Balram Bhargava
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-01-09
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  BCG-Based Vaccines Elicit Antigen-Specific Adaptive and Trained Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and Andes orthohantavirus.

Authors:  Jorge A Soto; Fabián E Díaz; Angello Retamal-Díaz; Nicolás M S Gálvez; Felipe Melo-González; Alejandro Piña-Iturbe; Mario A Ramírez; Karen Bohmwald; Pablo A González; Susan M Bueno; Alexis M Kalergis
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (R346K) variant in Syrian hamsters and its cross-neutralization with different variants of concern.

Authors:  Sreelekshmy Mohandas; Pragya D Yadav; Gajanan Sapkal; Anita M Shete; Gururaj Deshpande; Dimpal A Nyayanit; Deepak Patil; Manoj Kadam; Abhimanyu Kumar; Chandrashekhar Mote; Rajlaxmi Jain
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  Detection of SARS-CoV-2 peptide-specific antibodies in Syrian hamster serum by ELISA.

Authors:  Huy Quang Quach; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Gregory A Poland; Richard B Kennedy
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Protective efficacy of COVAXIN® against Delta and Omicron variants in hamster model.

Authors:  Pragya D Yadav; Sreelekshmy Mohandas; Anita Shete; Gajanan Sapkal; Gururaj Deshpande; Abhimanyu Kumar; Kundan Wakchaure; Hitesh Dighe; Rajlaxmi Jain; Brunda Ganneru; Jyoti Yemul; Pranita Gawande; Krishna Mohan Vadrevu; Priya Abraham
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-22

5.  Protective Immunity of the Primary SARS-CoV-2 Infection Reduces Disease Severity Post Re-Infection with Delta Variants in Syrian Hamsters.

Authors:  Sreelekshmy Mohandas; Pragya D Yadav; Anita Shete; Dimpal Nyayanit; Rajlaxmi Jain; Gajanan Sapkal; Chandrashekhar Mote
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 5.048

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.