| Literature DB >> 33997560 |
Kirthi S Bellamkonda1, Arash Fereydooni1, Kiley Trott2,3, Yan Lee2,3, Saral Mehra2,3, Naiem Nassiri1,3.
Abstract
Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) classically feature an intervening nidus of poorly differentiated endothelium. The pillar of modern AVM treatment is intranidal delivery and deposition of various liquid embolic agents such as n-butyl cyanoacrylate, ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, and ethanol. These agents are cumbersome to prepare, deliver, and deploy and have been associated with complications related to limited delivery control, nonretrievability, frequent microcatheter exchanges, and nontarget embolization. Coils and other proximal occlusive agents have not been traditionally recommended as sole embolic agents for AVM treatment given the inherent lack of adequate AVM nidus penetration with previous coil technologies. In the present report, we have described a series of three patients with AVMs in whom newer generation, platinum-based, packing coils were used safely and effectively as the primary agent for superselective nidal penetration and embolization.Entities:
Keywords: AVM; Arteriovenous malformation; Embolization; Nidus; Platinum coils
Year: 2021 PMID: 33997560 PMCID: PMC8095044 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.01.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ISSN: 2468-4287
Fig 1A (top row), Intraoperative imaging studies from patient 1 (from left to right): pre-embolization angiography of lesion, superselective microcatheterization of feeding vessel, nidal coil deposition, and postembolization angiogram depicting lesion devascularization. B (middle row), Intra- and postoperative imaging studies from patient 2 (from left to right): pre-embolization angiogram of lesion, postembolization angiogram depicting lesion devascularization, external appearance of lesion preoperatively, and external appearance of lesion postoperatively. C (bottom row), Intraoperative imaging of patient 3 (from left to right): pre-embolization angiogram of lesion, intermediate results of coil embolization, and final results of embolization.
Fig 2Left: Preoperative appearance of patient 3's lesion. Right: Appearance of lesion after embolization and surgical reconstruction.
Summary of Yakes classification system for arteriovenous malformations
| Yakes classification | Description |
|---|---|
| I | Arteriovenous fistula without intervening nidus, with one inflow artery and one outflow vein |
| II | Arteriovenous malformation with poorly differentiated nidus with multiple contributory arteries and (a) multiple outflow veins, which can be aneurysmal or (b) a solitary aneurysmal outflow vein |
| III | Arteriovenous malformation without a nidus, containing multiple contributory arteries and arterioles connecting directly into an aneurysmal vein and (a) one solitary outflow vein or (b) multiple outflow veins |
| IV | Arteriovenous malformation with nidus containing a large number of arterioles shunting into many venules, with extensive tissue infiltration |