| Literature DB >> 33997500 |
Tingfang Sun1, Chunqing Meng1, Qiuyue Ding1, Keda Yu1, Xianglin Zhang2, Wancheng Zhang2, Wenqing Tian2, Qi Zhang3, Xiaodong Guo1, Bin Wu2, Zekang Xiong1.
Abstract
In situ tissue engineering is a powerful strategy for the treatment of bone defects. It could overcome the limitations of traditional bone tissue engineering, which typically involves extensive cell expansion steps, low cell survival rates upon transplantation, and a risk of immuno-rejection. Here, a porous scaffold polycaprolactone (PCL)/decellularized small intestine submucosa (SIS) was fabricated via cryogenic free-form extrusion, followed by surface modification with aptamer and PlGF-2123-144*-fused BMP2 (pBMP2). The two bioactive molecules were delivered sequentially. The aptamer Apt19s, which exhibited binding affinity to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), was quickly released, facilitating the mobilization and recruitment of host BMSCs. BMP2 fused with a PlGF-2123-144 peptide, which showed "super-affinity" to the ECM matrix, was released in a slow and sustained manner, inducing BMSC osteogenic differentiation. In vitro results showed that the sequential release of PCL/SIS-pBMP2-Apt19s promoted cell migration, proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, and mRNA expression of osteogenesis-related genes. The in vivo results demonstrated that the sequential release system of PCL/SIS-pBMP2-Apt19s evidently increased bone formation in rat calvarial critical-sized defects compared to the sequential release system of PCL/SIS-BMP2-Apt19s. Thus, the novel delivery system shows potential as an ideal alternative for achieving cell-free scaffold-based bone regeneration in situ.Entities:
Keywords: 3D, three-dimensional; Apt19s, aptamer 19s; Aptamer; BMD, bone mineral density; BMP2; BMP2, bone morphogenic protein 2; BMSC, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell; Bone regeneration in situ; CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; CSD, critical-sized calvarial defect; Cell recruitment; Controlled delivery; ECM, decellularized matrix; FBS, fetal bovine serum; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; HA, hydroxyapatite; PCL, polycaprolactone; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; Rh6G, rhodamine 6G; SIS, small intestine submucosa; pBMP2, PlGF-2123-144*-fused BMP2; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA
Year: 2021 PMID: 33997500 PMCID: PMC8099605 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Scheme 1Schematic illustrations of in situ bone regeneration with sequential delivery of aptamer and BMP2 from an ECM-based scaffold fabricated by cryogenic free-form extrusion.
PCR primers for genes encoding Runx2, Opn, Ocn, ALP, and GAPDH.
| Primer | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | F5′-GACAAAATGGTGAAGGTCGGT | R5′-GAGGTCAATGAAGGGGTCG |
| Runx2 | F5′-AACTTGCTAACGTGAATGGTC | R5′-TAGCCCACTGAAGAAACTTGG |
| Opn | F5′-GAGGTGATAGCTTGGCTTACGG | R5′-ACGCTGGGCAACTGGGAT |
| Ocn | F5′-GAACAGACAAGTCCCACACAG | R5′TCAGCAGAGTGAGCAGAAAGAT |
| ALP | F5′-ACCACCACGAGAGTGAACCA | R5′-CGTTGTCTGAGTACCAGTCCC |
Fig. 1(A) Morphologies of cryogenic-printed and melting-printed PCL/SIS scaffolds observed using super deep optical microscope and SEM. (B–C) The rheological properties of prepared SIS slurry. (D–E) XRD and FTIR patterns of cryogenic-printed and melting-printed PCL/SIS scaffolds.
Fig. 2The loading and release profiles of Apt19s and BMP2. (A) Confocal microscopy images of the PCL/SIS scaffold modified with Apt19s and pBMP2. The upper line showed the confocal microscopy images of the PCL/SIS scaffold without Apt19s (a1), modified 2 nmol (a2) and 4 nmol (a3) of rhodamine-labeled Apt19s. The upper line showed the confocal microscopy images of the PCL/SIS scaffold without pBMP2 (a4), modified 1 μg (a5) and 2 μg (a6) of FITC-labeled pBMP2. (B–C) In vitro release profiles of Apt19s and BMP-2 from scaffolds of PCL/SIS-pBMP2-Apt and PCL/SIS-BMP2-Apt.
Fig. 3The fold change of BrdU incorporation after culturing for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days. Statistical significance compared to the PCL/SIS group is indicated by *p < 0.05.
Fig. 4Viability and morphology of rBMSCs cultured with the scaffolds. (A) Representative confocal images of cells with scaffolds. The upper line indicates the live/dead staining images of rBMSC cells cultured on scaffolds on day 7: live cells were stained with green fluorescence while dead cells were stained with red fluorescence. The lower lines showed the cytoskeletal staining of rBMSCs cultured with scaffolds: actin filaments were stained with phalloidin (red) and cell nuclei with DAPI (blue). (B) Percentage of live cells on scaffolds. (C) Live cell density (number of live cells per mm2) of rBMSC cells on scaffolds. Statistical significance is indicated by *p < 0.05 compared to the PCL/SIS group.
Fig. 5(A) Representative photos of cell migration in scaffold groups. (B) The numbers of migrating cells were determined. Statistical significance is indicated by *p < 0.05 compared to PCL/SIS group.
Fig. 6Osteogenic differentiation analysis. (A) ALP staining of cells on PCL/SIS, PCL/SIS-Apt, PCL/SIS-BMP2-Apt and PCL/SIS-pBMP2-Apt scaffolds at days 7 and 14. (B) Quantification of ALP activity in cells on scaffolds at days 7 and 14. (C) ARS staining, a marker for minerals deposited by cells on scaffolds, at days 14 and 21. (D) Quantification of minerals deposited by cells on scaffolds at days 14 and 21. (E) Time course changes in mRNA expression of osteogenic markers, such as Runx-2, ALP, Ocn and Opn in cells on PCL/SIS, PCL/SIS-Apt, PCL/SIS-BMP2-Apt and PCL/SIS-pBMP2-Apt scaffolds after culture for 7 and 14 days. (F) Western blot analysis for the osteogenic markers, RUNX2 and OCN, and osteogenic-related signal pathway molecule (Smad 1/5/8) after culture for 7 days. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ARS, Alizarin Red S. mRNA, messenger RNA; BMP2, bone morphogenetic protein 2; Ocn, osteocalcin; Opn, osteopontin; Statistical significance is indicated by *p < 0.05 compared with the PCL/SIS group and #p < 0.05 compared with the PCL/SIS-BMP2-Apt group.
Fig. 7Micro-CT evaluation of the repaired skull at 4 and 8 weeks after implantation. (A) Representative micro-CT images and pseudo-color images of calvarial defects treated with PCL/SIS, PCL/SIS-Apt, PCL/SIS-BMP2-Apt and PCL/SIS-pBMP2-Apt. (B) Quantitative analysis of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) in the repaired cranial defect area. (C) Quantitative analysis of BMD in the repaired cranial defect area. Statistical significance is indicated by *p < 0.05. BV, bone volume; BMD, bone mineral density; TV, total volume.
Fig. 8Histological evaluations of cranial defect regeneration at 4 and 8 weeks post-implantation (A) Representative H&E and Masson staining histological images of PCL/SIS, PCL/SIS-Apt, PCL/SIS-BMP2-Apt and PCL/SIS-pBMP2-Apt. (B) Quantitative analysis of new bone area percentages. (C) Quantitative analysis of new vessel density in each group. NB represents newly formed bone. Black arrows represent vessels. Statistical significance is indicated by *p < 0.05.