| Literature DB >> 33997428 |
Aroon La-Up1, Udomsak Saengow2,3,4, Apinun Aramrattana5,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to examine the association between Kratom use and serum lipid level.Entities:
Keywords: HDL; Kratom; Mitragyna speciosa; Serum lipid; triglyceride
Year: 2021 PMID: 33997428 PMCID: PMC8102425 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Characteristics of study subjects.
| Characteristics | Statistics | User | Non-user | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 285 | 296 | ||
| Age | Mean ± SD | 55.8 ± 11.4 | 55.7 ± 12.0 | 0.963 |
| Sex (Male) | n (%) | 224 (78.6) | 90 (30.4) | <0.001 |
| BMI | Mean ± SD | 23.1 ± 3.9 | 25.2 ± 4.8 | <0.001 |
| Current Smoker | n (%) | 154 (54.0) | 39 (13.2) | <0.001 |
| Current Drinker | n (%) | 74 (26.0) | 23 (7.8) | <0.001 |
| Exercise ≥3 times/week | n (%) | 80 (28.1) | 114 (38.5) | 0.008 |
| Hyperlipidemia | n (%) | 58 (20.4) | 68 (23.0) | 0.443 |
| Hypertension | n (%) | 78 (27.4) | 79 (26.7) | 0.854 |
| Diabetes | n (%) | 28 (9.8) | 26 (8.8) | 0.666 |
| Anti-hypertensive treatment | n (%) | 67 (23.5) | 73 (24.7) | 0.566 |
| Anti-hyperlipidemic treatment | n (%) | 50 (17.5) | 60 (20.3) | 0.469 |
| Anti-diabetic treatment | n (%) | 25 (8.8) | 25 (8.4) | 0.305 |
| Total cholesterol | Median (IQR) | 198.5 (59.8) | 204.0 (48.8) | 0.233 |
| Triglyceride | Median (IQR) | 92.0 (67.5) | 109.5 (83.8) | <0.001 |
| LDL | Median (IQR) | 119.5 (52.5) | 125.0 (43.8) | 0.077 |
| HDL | Median (IQR) | 54.0 (19.8) | 51.0 (16.8) | 0.026 |
IQR = Interquartile range.
t-test.
chi-square test.
Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 1Total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, and HDL levels of Kratom users and non-users.
Figure 2Prevalence of subjects with triglycerides <90 mg/dL and HDL ≥60 mg/dL (left panel, p-value <0.001; right panel, p-value 0.004).
Association between Kratom use with triglyceride <90 mg/dL and HDL ≥60 mg/dL (logistic regression).
| Variable | Triglyceride <90 mg/dL | HDL ≥60 mg/dL | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | Adjusted | Crude | Adjusted | |||||||||
| OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Kratom use | ||||||||||||
| User | 1.87 | 1.34–2.62 | <0.001 | 1.75 | 1.17–2.63 | 0.007 | 1.70 | 119–2.43 | 0.004 | 1.82 | 1.17–2.82 | 0.008 |
| Non-user | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||
| Age (year) | 1.00 | 0.98–1.01 | 0.654 | 0.99 | 0.98–1.01 | 0.376 | 1.01 | 0.99–1.02 | 0.540 | 1.00 | 0.99–1.02 | 0.797 |
| BMI | 0.90 | 0.87–0.94 | <0.001 | 0.91 | 0.87–0.96 | <0.001 | 0.89 | 0.85–0.94 | <0.001 | 0.88 | 0.83–0.92 | <0.001 |
| Sex | ||||||||||||
| Female | 0.71 | 0.51–0.99 | .046 | 1.36 | 0.85–2.19 | 0.202 | 0.93 | 0.65–1.32 | 0.672 | 1.85 | 1.10–3.12 | 0.020 |
| Male | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||
| Smoking | ||||||||||||
| No | 1.56 | 1.10–2.21 | 0.013 | 1.09 | 0.68–1.75 | 0.732 | 0.99 | 0.68–1.44 | 0.969 | 1.88 | 1.09–3.19 | 0.020 |
| Yes | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||
| Drinking | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 1.81 | 1.17–2.80 | 0.008 | 1.53 | 0.93–2.51 | 0.092 | 2.56 | 1.64–4.00 | <0.001 | 3.35 | 1.97–5.68 | <0.001 |
| No | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||
| Exercise | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 1.54 | 1.09–2.18 | 0.016 | 1.66 | 1.15–2.40 | 0.007 | 0.89 | 0.61–1.30 | 0.892 | 0.84 | 0.56–1.26 | 0.395 |
| No | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||
Association between Kratom use and serum triglyceride and HDL (linear regression).
| Variables | Triglyceride | HDL | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | Adjusted | Crude | Adjusted | |||||||||
| B | 95% CI | p-value | B | 95% CI | p-value | B | 95% CI | p-value | B | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Kratom use | ||||||||||||
| User | 4.85 | −21.66–11.96 | 0.571 | −12.92 | −32.49–6.65 | 0.195 | 3.12 | 0.66–5.66 | 0.012 | 4.09 | 1.40–6.79 | 0.003 |
| Non-user | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||||
| Age (year) | −0.37 | −1.09–0.35 | 0.307 | −0.24 | −0.96–0.48 | 0.505 | 0.054 | −0.05–0.16 | 0.312 | 0.024 | −0.08–0.12 | 0.628 |
| BMI | 2.57 | 0.71–4.23 | 0.007 | 3.00 | 1.01–4.99 | 0.003 | −0.826 | −1.09 – (−0.56) | <0.001 | −0.949 | −1.22 – (−0.68) | <0.001 |
| Sex | ||||||||||||
| Female | −10.94 | −27.77–5.89 | 0.202 | −21.14 | −43.95–1.68 | 0.069 | 1.07 | −1.40–3.53 | 0.396 | 6.06 | 2.92–9.20 | <0.001 |
| Male | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||||
| Smoking | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 3.94 | −13.90–21.78 | 0.664 | −3.98 | −27.17–19.23 | 0.737 | −1.14 | −3.75–1.46 | 0.389 | −4.48 | −7.68 – (−1.28) | 0.006 |
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||||
| Drinker | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 23.43 | 0.97–45.88 | 0.41 | 22.97 | −1.495–47.44 | 0.066 | 7.79 | 4.55–11.02 | <0.001 | 10.03 | 6.67–13.40 | <0.001 |
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||||
| Exercise | ||||||||||||
| Yes | −16.83 | −34.60–0.94 | 0.063 | 15.79 | −33.60–2.02 | 0.082 | 1.30 | −1.31–3.90 | 0.329 | 0.767 | −1.68–3.22 | 0.539 |
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||||||
Association between Kratom use and HDL ≥60 mg/dL among drinkers and non-drinkers.
| Drinking | Kratom use | HDL ≥60 mg/dL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % | ||
| Yes | User | 38 | 51.4 |
| Non-user | 9 | 39.1 | |
| No | User | 55 | 30.8 |
| Non-user | 65 | 23.8 | |
| Mantel-Haenszel OR (95% CI) | 1.46 (1.01–2.11) | ||
Correlation between patterns of Kratom use and serum triglycerides and HDL.
| Patterns of Kratom use | HDL | Triglyceride | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | p-value | Coefficient | p-value | |
| Age of first Kratom use (years old) | −0.0055 | 0.036∗ | −0.015 | 0.798 |
| Duration of Kratom use (years) | 0.139 | 0.019∗ | −0.017 | 0.772 |
| Frequency of Kratom use per day (times) | 0.105 | 0.077 | −0.085 | 0.154 |
| Number of Kratom leaves used per day (leaves) | 0.068 | 0.258 | −0.057 | 0.341 |
Figure 3Correlation between Kratom use patterns and HDL level (n = 285).
Figure 4Correlation between Kratom use patterns and triglyceride level (n = 285).