| Literature DB >> 33997300 |
F Zakerkish1, M J Soriano2, E Novella-Mestre2, M Brännström1, C Díaz-García2.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Do therapeutic levels of cyclosporine-A and tacrolimus affect ovulation in a rat gonadotrophin-induced ovulation model? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cyclosporine-A, but not tacrolimus, decreases ovulation rate when administered for 5 days before induced ovulation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The mainstays of immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation, to prevent rejection, are the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine-A or tacrolimus. These drugs could potentially affect fertility in transplanted patients. Since ovulation is an inflammation-like process with pivotal roles for several immune cells and modulators, it is possible that the calcineurin inhibitors, with broad effects on the immune system, could interfere with this sensitive, biological process. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Experimental design at university-based animal facilities. A total of 45 immature Sprague-Dawley rats were used. The study was carried out over 3 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTINGEntities:
Keywords: calcineurin; cyclosporine-A; immunosuppression; ovary; ovulation; rat; tacrolimus; transplantation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33997300 PMCID: PMC8111498 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod Open ISSN: 2399-3529
Figure 1.Scheme of the experimental design using a rat gonadotrophin-induced ovulation model. Sprague–Dawley rats were synchronized for ovulation by injecting 10 IU of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) s.c.; 48 h later, ovulation was induced by injecting 10 IU of hCG i.p. and 20 h after induction, the animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation. During the 7 days prior to euthanasia, the animals received tacrolimus 0.5 mg/kg/day (TAC; n = 15); cyclosporin-A 10 mg/kg/day (CyA; n = 15); or normal saline (Control; n = 15).
Counts of total white blood cells and their subpopulations in rat peripheral blood.
| Control (n = 8) | CyA (n = 8) | TAC (n = 8) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (cells/μl) | 3063 ± 1560 | 3178 ± 1246 | 1958 ± 645 | n.s. |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 86 ± 3 | 77 ± 6 | 85 ± 6 |
|
| Neutrophils (%) | 10 ± 4 | 13 ± 3 | 8 ± 6 | n.s. |
| Monocytes (%) | 3 ± 1 | 7 ± 5 | 5 ± 3 |
|
| Eosinophils (%) | 0 [0–1] | 0 [0–1] | 0 [0–2] |
|
| Basophils (%) | 0 [0–1] | 0 | 0 | n.s. |
WBC, white blood cells; CyA, cyclosporine-A; TAC, tacrolimus.
Comparisons were performed using the Control group (normal saline) as reference. Student’s t-test was used. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05.
Significant differences between Control and CyA group.
Significant differences between Control and TAC.
Figure 2.Ovulation rate outcomes in the rat gonadotrophin-induced ovulation model. Bars represent the median (vertical line) and ranges for the ovulation rate in different groups. Significant differences between Control and CyA group are represented by * (P<0.05). MII: metaphase II.
Figure 3.Analysis of ELANE, MPO, RUNX2 and TIMP3 mRNA expression levels in rat ovary. Columns represent fold changes (y-axis) using the control group as reference (1-fold change). Bars represent SDs of delta-Ct measurements. ACTB, actin beta; ELANE, elastase neutrophil expressed; MPO, myeloperoxidase; RUNX2, runt-related transcription factor 2; TIMP3, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases.
Figure 4.Macrophage distribution within the rat ovaries. Two main patterns of CD163+ cells were identified in rat ovaries. (A) Macrophages around the vascular structures (asterisks). (B) Macrophages within the newly formed corpus luteum. The rectangles delineated by dotted lines are shown at three different magnifications. These images illustrated ovaries from animals in the tacrolimus group.