| Literature DB >> 33997133 |
Chun Ki Chun1, Frances Ky Wong2, Shao Ling Wang2, Weiju Chen3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There were studies evaluating advanced nursing practice independently in the mainland and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, but there was no attempt to make a comparison of practice between them. This study employed a case study method to examine and compare advanced nursing practice in Hong Kong and Guangzhou.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced practice nurses; Advanced practice nursing; China; Process-structure-outcome; Professional competence; Qualitative research
Year: 2021 PMID: 33997133 PMCID: PMC8105546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nurs Sci ISSN: 2352-0132
Data collection description, method and analysis.
| Description | Method | Analysis (Data category) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background Information | Demography: Age Gender Specialty Length of specialty Job title Highest education level | Questionnaire (6 items) | Descriptive analysis (Quantitative) |
| Structure | Factors facilitating or hindering the establishment of advanced nursing practices | Interview (2 open-ended questions) | Inductive content analysis (Qualitative) |
| Process | 1. Dimensions of roles: Role components Percentage of dependent/interdependent/independent practice Referral Consultation Diagnostic and therapeutic practice behavior | Questionnaire (5 items) | Descriptive analysis (Quantitative) |
| 2. An exemplary case illustrating APN work, with provision of supplementary document validating case description. | Interview (1 open-ended question) | Deductive content analysis (Qualitative) | |
| Outcome | APN outcome indicators | Questionnaire (12 items) | Descriptive analysis (Quantitative) |
Demographic data.
| Demographic | Hong Kong | Guangzhou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age, years, | 40.3 ± 5.1 | 37.7 ± 4.4 | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 2 | 0 | |
| Female | 10 | 12 | |
| Specialty | |||
| Medicine | 5 | 3 | |
| Surgery | 4 | 4 | |
| Pediatrics | 3 | 5 | |
| Experience in the specialty, years, | 15.4 ± 5.1 | 12.1 ± 5.6 | |
| Job title | |||
| Advanced practice nurse (APN) | 11 | – | |
| Ward manager | 1 | – | |
| Head nurse | – | 9 | |
| Nursing team leader | – | 1 | |
| Specialty nurse | – | 1 | |
| Nurse | – | 1 | |
| Highest education level | |||
| Master’s degree | 12 | 12 | |
Comparison between the two groups on role components, role dependence and therapeutic practice behavior.
| Process of care | Hong Kong ( | Guangzhou ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Role componentsa,b | |||
| Direct client service | 45.0 (38.0) | 20.0 (29.0) | 0.020 |
| Indirect client service | 20.0 (10.0) | 20.0 (13.0) | 0.443 |
| Staff development | 10.0 (14.0) | 20.0 (5.0) | 0.242 |
| Meetings | 7.5 (5.0) | 14.0 (10.0) | 0.010 |
| Research/project work | 5.0 (9.0) | 10.0 (10.0) | 0.028 |
| Miscellaneous | 5.0 (5.0) | 6.5 (7.0) | 0.887 |
| Role dependence levela,b | |||
| Independent | 55.0 (39.0) | 60.0 (30.0) | 0.291 |
| Interdependent | 27.5 (38.0) | 30.0 (30.0) | 0.630 |
| Dependent | 10.0 (20.0) | 5.0 (10.0) | 0.178 |
| Initiate new medication | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Adjust prescribed medication | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Initiate therapy | 2 (16.7) | 1 (8.3) | |
| Initiate diagnostic tests | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Admission privileges | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Staff protocols initiated | 6 (50.0) | 10 (83.3) | |
| Client pamphlets and/or protocols initiated | 8 (66.7) | 10 (83.3) | |
Note:a The sum of percent of Role components and Role dependence is out of 100%; b Mann-Whitney U was computed to compare the two groups with P-value based on Exact Sig. [2∗(1-tailed Sig.)].
Key outcome indicators of APN practice chosen by APNs.
| Key indicators reflecting service outcomes∗ | Hong Kong | Guangzhou |
|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |
| Patient safety | 12 | 12 |
| Client satisfaction | 12 | 11 |
| Caring of the carer | 11 | 11 |
| Symptom management | 10 | 12 |
| Activities of daily living | 10 | 9 |
| Complication prevention | 9 | 11 |
| Length of hospital stay | 8 | 6 |
| Readmission rate | 3 | 3 |
| Nurse clinic attendance rate | 2 | 2 |
| Waiting time for first attendance | 1 | 3 |
| Emergency room attendance rate | 1 | 0 |
Note: ∗Can choose more than one.