| Literature DB >> 33997060 |
Toshiaki Kameda1, Eiji Kondo2, Tomohiro Onodera1, Koji Iwasaki3, Jun Onodera4, Kazunori Yasuda4, Norimasa Iwasaki1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) theoretically causes distalization and lateralization of the tibial tuberosity and the patella. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to identify any changes in the stress distribution of subchondral bone density across the patellofemoral (PF) joint before and after OWHTO through the use of computed tomography (CT) osteoabsorptiometry. We hypothesized that OWHTO would alter the distribution of contact stress in the PF joint. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: high tibial osteotomy; knee osteoarthritis; medial open-wedge; patellofemoral joint
Year: 2021 PMID: 33997060 PMCID: PMC8072873 DOI: 10.1177/2325967121998050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Flowchart for patients with inclusion and exclusion criteria. OWHTO, open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.
Figure 2.(A) The subchondral bone region of the patellofemoral articular surface of the distal femur is automatically identified using our original software. In each axial slice, the Hounsfield units of the identified region are measured at each coordinate point. (B) Distribution of the subchondral bone density is determined by stacking the data obtained from axial slices. (C) For quantitative analysis, the distribution pattern is represented as a surface mapping image depicted by 8-grade color scale. Min, minimum; Max, maximum.
Figure 3.Divided regions of the (A) trochlea and (B) patella for quantitative analysis of the obtained mapping data. CR, central ridge; LLF, lateral portion of the lateral facet; LN, lateral notch; LT, lateral trochlea; MF, medial facet; MLF, medial portion of the lateral facet; MN, medial notch; MT, medial trochlea.
Patient Characteristics (N = 17)
| Variable | No. or Mean ± SD (Range) |
|---|---|
| Sex, male:female, n | 5:12 |
| Age, y | 58.4 ± 9.4 (40-68) |
| Height, cm | 161.7 ± 11.1 (150.0-183.0) |
| Body weight, kg | 67.0 ± 10.5 (52.8-86.5) |
| Body mass index | 25.5 ± 2.1 (22.1-29.5) |
| Complications, n | |
| Meniscal tear | 10 |
| Other | 0 |
| Follow-up period, mo | 14.4 ± 3.4 (12-23) |
Mean %HDA of Each Region of the Femoral Trochlea and the Patella Pre- and Postoperatively
| %HDA | Pre-OWHTO | Post-OWHTO |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Femoral trochlea | |||
| MT | 26.0 ± 32.7 | 9.1 ± 9.7 |
|
| MN | 47.4 ± 28.5 | 40.2 ± 19.6 | .362 |
| LN | 23.9 ± 19.6 | 37.7 ± 23.6 |
|
| LT | 2.7 ± 5.1 | 13.1 ± 13.6 |
|
| Patella | |||
| MF | 9.7 ± 12.2 | 8.1 ± 9.1 | .576 |
| CR | 22.8 ± 20.7 | 22.8 ± 19.0 | .995 |
| MLF | 41.0 ± 24.2 | 53.9 ± 20.2 |
|
| LLF | 26.3 ± 24.7 | 15.2 ± 16.3 |
|
Data are reported as mean ± SD. Bolded P values indicate statistically significant difference between groups (P < .05). CR, central ridge; %HDA, percentage of high-density area; LLF, lateral portion of lateral facet; LN, lateral notch; LT, lateral trochlea; MF, medial facet; MLF, medial portion of lateral facet; MN, medial notch; MT, medial trochlea; OWHTA, open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.
Test-Retest Reliability of the Radiologic Measurements
| Variable | ICC (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Femorotibial angle | 0.958 (0.899-0.976) |
| Weightbearing line | 0.970 (0.926-0.982) |
| Posterior tibial slope | 0.903 (0.770-0.943) |
| Insall-Salvati ratio | 0.986 (0.966-0.992) |
| Blackburne-Peel ratio | 0.928 (0.828-0.958) |
| Tilting angle | 0.984 (0.962-0.991) |
| Lateral shift | 0.994 (0.984-0.996) |
| Congruence angle | 0.997 (0.993-0.998) |
ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.
Radiologic Examination Results Between Pre- and Post-OWHTO
| Variable | Pre-OWHTO | Post-OWHTO |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Femorotibial angle, deg | 178.8 ± 2.6 | 169.8 ± 1.8 |
|
| Weightbearing line, % | 23.1 ± 13.4 | 71.2 ± 6.3 |
|
| Posterior tibial slope, deg | 9.0 ± 2.1 | 9.5 ± 2.5 | .438 |
| Insall-Salvati ratio | 1.05 ± 0.14 | 1.06 ± 0.16 | .542 |
| Blackburne-Peel ratio | 0.80 ± 0.10 | 0.66 ± 0.10 |
|
| Tilting angle, deg | 8.6 ± 4.0 | 4.8 ± 4.0 |
|
| Lateral shift, % | 12.5 ± 6.4 | 11.1 ± 6.5 | .071 |
| Congruence angle, deg | –9.4 ± 11.2 | –6.9 ± 11.3 | .239 |
| Tibiofemoral OA, No. of knees | .332 | ||
| Grade 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Grade 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Grade 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| Grade 3 | 13 | 14 | |
| Grade 4 | 1 | 0 | |
| Patellofemoral OA, No. of knees |
| ||
| Grade 0 | 5 | 2 | |
| Grade 1 | 12 | 14 | |
| Grade 2 | 0 | 1 | |
| Grade 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Grade 4 | 0 | 0 |
Data are reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Bolded P values indicate statistically significant difference between groups (P < .05). OA, osteoarthritis; OWHTO, open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.
According to the Kellgren-Lawrence[15] grading system.
Figure 4.The mechanism whereby the compressive force on the lateral side of the patella is increased after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Lateral and distal shift of the tibial tubercle increased the pressure between the lateral patellar facet and the lateral wall of the trochlea (yellow allows) and forced up the lateral groove (red circle), leading to a medial tilt of the patella (red arrow).