Xu Shi1, Wang Miao2, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen3. 1. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. 2. Department of Probability and Statistics, Peking University, Beijing, China. 3. Statistics Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Negative controls are a powerful tool to detect and adjust for bias in epidemiological research. This paper introduces negative controls to a broader audience and provides guidance on principled design and causal analysis based on a formal negative control framework. RECENT FINDINGS: We review and summarize causal and statistical assumptions, practical strategies, and validation criteria that can be combined with subject-matter knowledge to perform negative control analyses. We also review existing statistical methodologies for the detection, reduction, and correction of confounding bias, and briefly discuss recent advances towards nonparametric identification of causal effects in a double-negative control design. SUMMARY: There is great potential for valid and accurate causal inference leveraging contemporary healthcare data in which negative controls are routinely available. Design and analysis of observational data leveraging negative controls is an area of growing interest in health and social sciences. Despite these developments, further effort is needed to disseminate these novel methods to ensure they are adopted by practicing epidemiologists.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Negative controls are a powerful tool to detect and adjust for bias in epidemiological research. This paper introduces negative controls to a broader audience and provides guidance on principled design and causal analysis based on a formal negative control framework. RECENT FINDINGS: We review and summarize causal and statistical assumptions, practical strategies, and validation criteria that can be combined with subject-matter knowledge to perform negative control analyses. We also review existing statistical methodologies for the detection, reduction, and correction of confounding bias, and briefly discuss recent advances towards nonparametric identification of causal effects in a double-negative control design. SUMMARY: There is great potential for valid and accurate causal inference leveraging contemporary healthcare data in which negative controls are routinely available. Design and analysis of observational data leveraging negative controls is an area of growing interest in health and social sciences. Despite these developments, further effort is needed to disseminate these novel methods to ensure they are adopted by practicing epidemiologists.
Authors: Bronwyn K Brew; Tong Gong; Dylan M Williams; Henrik Larsson; Catarina Almqvist Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: E A Mitchell; R P Ford; A W Stewart; B J Taylor; D M Becroft; J M Thompson; R Scragg; I B Hassall; D M Barry; E M Allen Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1993-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Martijn J Schuemie; Patrick B Ryan; George Hripcsak; David Madigan; Marc A Suchard Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: W Dana Flanders; Lance A Waller; Qi Zhang; Darios Getahun; Michael Silverberg; Michael Goodman Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Paola Gilsanz; Jessica G Young; M Maria Glymour; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Chloe W Eng; Karestan C Koenen; Laura D Kubzansky Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 5.363
Authors: Matt D T Hitchings; Joseph A Lewnard; Natalie E Dean; Albert I Ko; Otavio T Ranzani; Jason R Andrews; Derek A T Cummings Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.860