| Literature DB >> 33995021 |
Tesfay Haile1, Susana M Cardoso2, Chirle de Oliveira Raphaelli3, Olívia R Pereira4, Elisa Dos Santos Pereira3, Márcia Vizzotto5, Leonardo Nora3, Adissu Alemayehu Asfaw6, Gomathi Periasamy1, Aman Karim1,7.
Abstract
Thymus serrulatus, an endemic plant of Ethiopia, is traditionally used to cure various diseases and as a food ingredient. In the Ethiopian folk medicine, the decoction is orally taken as a remedy to treat diabetes and high blood pressure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antioxidant and antihyperglycemic effects of the aqueous extract and of the essential oil of Thymus serrulatus. The chemical composition of the aqueous extract was determined by LC-MS and the essential oil was characterized by GC-MS analysis. Radical scavenging assays, namely scavenging of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•), hydroxyl (•OH), and nitric oxide (•NO), were used as a first approach to screen the potential antioxidant abilities of the samples. Alpha-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory studies were also employed to evaluate the in vitro antihyperglycemic potential of the plant. The in vivo blood glucose lowering effect of the extracts was assessed using hypoglycemic activity and the oral glucose tolerance test in normal and in streptozotocin induced diabetic mice. When compared to the aqueous extract, the essential oil showed superior radical scavenging activity, particularly for •NO, as well as greater inhibitory potency against α-amylase and α-glucosidase (IC50 = 0.01 mg/ml and 0.11 mg/ml, respectively). Both tested samples showed a statistically significant antihyperglycemic effect. The aqueous extract at 600 mg/kg exerted maximum antihyperglycemic activity (44.14%), followed by the essential oil (30.82%). Body weight and glucose tolerance parameters were also improved by the samples both in normal and diabetic mice. The findings of this study support the hypothesis that aqueous extract and essential oil of T. serrulatus are promising therapeutic agents.Entities:
Keywords: alpha-amylase; alpha-glucosidase; antihyperglycemic activity; antioxidant activity; essential oil; phenolic compounds profile; thyme-decoction; thymus serrulatus
Year: 2021 PMID: 33995021 PMCID: PMC8116798 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.621536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1LC-MS Chromatographic profile of T. serrulatus aqueous extract.
Phenolic compounds of T. serrulatus aqueous extracts determined by UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn.
| NP | TR (min) | λMax (nm) | [H–M]− | MS/MS fragments ( | Probable compound | Phenolic content (mg/g)/% composition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.7 | 206 | 191 | 111, 173 | Quinic acid | D |
| 2 | 3.5 | 280 | 197 | 179, 73, 153 | Danshensu | 6.4 ± 0.9/3.3 |
| 3 | 3.7 | 279 | 571 | 509, 553, 237 | Yunnaneic acid E | 1.7 ± 0.4/0.88 |
| 4 | 9.0 | 292, 324 | 367 | 193, 191, 173 | Feruloylquinic acid | 1.3 ± 0.1/0.67 |
| 5 | 13.4 | 284 | 387 | 207, 163, 369 | HydroxyJasm acid- | D |
| 6 | 14.6 | 271, 333 | 593 | 473, 503, 353, 383, 575 | Apigenin di- | 5.3 ± 0.4/2.73 |
| 7 | 15.0 | 290, 324sh | 375 | 313, 269, 179, 135 | Salvianolic acid F derivative | 12.2 ± 1.7/6.29 |
| 8 | 16.0 | 283 | 449 | 287 | Eriodictyol- | 0.4 ± 0.1/0.21 |
| 9 | 16.9 | 287, 318sh | 375 | 313, 269, 179, 135 | Salvianolic acid F derivative | 8.4 ± 0.7/4.33 |
| 10 | 17.4 | 282, 341 | 477 | 301, 299, 277, 191 | Quercetin glucuronide | 1.9 ± 0.2/0.98 |
| 11 | 17.7 | 281, 341 | 463 | 301 | Quercetin- | 2.1 ± 0.3/1.08 |
| 12 | 18.4 | 287, 329 | 553 | 491, 357, 399, 535 | Salvianolic acid C derivative | D |
| 13 | 18.6 | 242, 260sh, 341 | 447 | 285 | Luteolin-7- | 2.5 ± 0.3/1.29 |
| 14 | 21.1 | 254, 267sh, 341 | 593 | 285 | Luteolin- | 1.4 ± 0.2/0.72 |
| 15 | 21.3 | 254, 264sh, 345 | 461 | 285 | Luteolin- | 17.3 ± 1.5/8.91 |
| 16 | 23.0 | 292sh, 308 | 521 | 359, 179, 197, 161 | Rosmarinic acid hexoside | 2.9 ± 0.2/1.49 |
| 17 | 25.5 | 287sh, 318 | 403 | 367, 385, 359, 313, 223 | Rosmarinic acid derivative | 2.1 ± 0.3/1.08 |
| 18 | 26.1 | 290sh, 328 | 359 | 161, 179, 197, 223, 133, 123 | Rosmarinic acid | 19.4 ± 1.5/9.99 |
| 19 | 26.9 | 287, 326sh | 555 | 493, 359, 401, 537 | Salvianolic acid K (isomer 1) | 53.8 ± 2.9/27.72 |
| 20 | 27.0 | 268, 337 | 461 | 285 | Isoscutellarein | 31.3 ± 3.3/16.13 |
| 21 | 27.6 | 287, 330sh | 717 | 519, 357, 555, 475 | Salvianolic acid B | 22.7 ± 1.8/11.7 |
| 22 | 27.9 | 287, 332sh | 555 | 493, 359, 195, 179 | Salvianolic acid K (isomer 2) | 37.1 ± 2.7/19.11 |
| 23 | 30.1 | 252, 266, 344 | 591 | 531, 549, 285 | Luteolin acetyl dipentoside | 1.5 ± 0.2/0.77 |
| 24 | 31.1 | 287sh, 326 | 373 | 179, 161, 135, 197, 329, 355 | Methyl rosmarinate | 1.3 ± 0.1/0.67 |
| 25 | 32.1 | 284sh, 340 | 537 | 493, 515, 519, 357, 297, 179 | Caffeoyl RA (isomer1) | D |
| 26 | 32.6 | 287sh, 326 | 537 | 493, 515, 359, 375, 357 | Caffeoyl RA (isomer2) | 1.4 ± 0.1/0.72 |
| 27 | 33.1 | 284sh, 341 | 537 | 493, 519, 515, 357, 339, 179 | Caffeoyl RA (isomer3) | D |
| 28 | 33.4 | 287sh, 328 | 537 | 493, 519, 357, 438, 339, 197 | Caffeoyl RA (isomer4) | D |
| 29 | 34.3 | 287, 332sh | 493 | 359, 357, 313, 161, 295 | Salvianolic acid A | 4.7 ± 0.5/2.42 |
| Total quantified phenolic content (mg/g) | 194.1 ± 15.9 | |||||
Values expressed as mg/g of extract; NP, Number of peak; D, Detected; TR, Retention time; RA, Rosmarinic acid, sh, shoulder.
FIGURE 2GC-MS chromatographic profile of the essential oil of T. serrulatus.
Chemical composition of the essential oil extracted from the aerial parts of T. serrulatus.
| Peak Nº | Compound name | TR (min.) | Ri | % Area | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | α-Thujene | 6.176 | 931 | 0.75 | 1.2 |
| 2 | α-Pinene | 6.374 | 937 | 0.14 | 1.2 |
| 3 | 3-Octanone | 7.945 | 986 | 0.07 | 1.2 |
| 4 | β-Myrcene | 8.092 | 991 | 2.26 | 1.2 |
| 5 | α-Phellandrene | 8.531 | 1003 | 0.09 | 1.2 |
| 6 | α-Terpinene | 8.929 | 1017 | 0.83 | 1.2 |
| 7 |
| 9.201 | 1022 | 9.39 | 1.2 |
| 8 |
| 9.348 | 1027 | 0.15 | 1.2 |
| 9 | (Z)-β-ocimene | 9.652 | 1038 | 0.14 | 1.2 |
| 10 | (E)-β-ocimene | 9.997 | 1049 | 0.17 | 1.2 |
| 11 | γ-Terpenene | 10.384 | 1060 | 9.34 | 1.2 |
| 12 | Linalool | 11.787 | 1099 | 0.35 | 1.2 |
| 13 | Terpinen-4-ol | 14.520 | 1177 | 0.33 | 1.2 |
| 14 | Thymol methyl ether | 16.520 | 1235 | 0.11 | 1.2 |
| 15 | Carvacrol methyl ether | 16.844 | 1244 | 2.77 | 1.2 |
| 16 | Thymol | 18.572 | 1291 | 56.24 | 1,2,3 |
| 17 | Carvacrol | 18.855 | 1299 | 15.44 | 1.2 |
| 18 | Thymol acetate | 20.540 | 1355 | 0.58 | 1.2 |
| 19 | Carvacrol acetate | 21.147 | 1371 | 0.20 | 1.2 |
| 20 | (E)-caryophyllene | 22.674 | 1419 | 0.31 | 1.2 |
| 21 | Germacrene D | 24.592 | 1481 | 0.07 | 1.2 |
| 22 | β-Bisabolene | 25.409 | 1509 | 0.26 | 1.2 |
Identification method: 1, comparison of the Kovats retention indices with published data; 2, comparison of mass spectra with those listed in the NIST 2.2; 3, co-injection with authentic compound.
Antioxidant activity of Thymus serrulatus aqueous extract and essential oil.
| Sample | Radical capture (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| •DPPH | •OH | •NO | |
| TSEO | 94.51 ± 0.08 | 51.35 ± 0.59 | 34.89 ± 11.88 |
| TSAE | 93.60 ± 0.03 | 48.89 ± 1.29 | ND |
| Quercetin | 92.98 ± 0.38 | ND | ND |
Results expressed as the mean of % inhibition ± standard deviation. TSEO, Thymus serrulatus essential oil; TSAE, Thymus serrulatus aqueous extract; •OH, hydroxyl radical; NO, nitric oxide radical; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical; ND, not detected.
Inhibitory ability (IC50, mg/mL) of Thymus serrulatus aqueous extract and essential oil against the digestive enzymes α-glucosidase and α-amylase.
| Sample | IC50 value (mg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|
| α-amylase | α-glucosidase | |
| TSEO | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| TSAE | 24.47 ± 0.29 | 2.47 ± 0.45 |
| Acarbose | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 16.88 ± 10.69 |
Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation. TSEO, Thymus serrulatus essential oil; TSAE, Thymus serrulatus aqueous extract.
Hypoglycemic effects of the aqueous extract and essential oil of T. serrulatus in normoglycemic mice.
| Treatment groups | Fasting blood glucose concentration (mg/dl) | % Change in FBG (hr. 0–6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 1 h | 3 h | 6 h | ||
| 1 (negative control) | 85.67 ± 0.80 | 81.17 ± 0.79 | 75.00 ± 1.13 | 73.33 ± 0.95 | −14.40% |
| 2 (TSAE 150 mg/kg) | 85.50 ± 1.20 | 79.67 ± 0.95 | 70.33 ± 2.40 | 77.67 ± 0.92 | −9.16% |
| 3 (TSAE 300 mg/kg) | 84.33 ± 1.23 | 84.17 ± 2.52 | 71.33 ± 2.29 | 65.33 ± 2.32*** | −22.53% |
| 4 (TSAE 600 mg/kg) | 76.17 ± 0.87 | 78.00 ± 0.89 | 67.83 ± 0.60* | 66.67 ± 0.88** | −12.46% |
| 5 (TSEO 150 mg/kg) | 75.83 ± 0.31 | 82.17 ± 0.48 | 77.00 ± 0.37 | 81.00 ± 0.63 | +6.82% |
| 6 (TSEO 300 mg/kg) | 83.83 ± 0.48 | 84.00 ± 0.45 | 76.17 ± 0.95 | 79.33 ± 0.56* | −5.37% |
| 7 (TSEO 600 mg/kg) | 77.33 ± 1.02 | 76.50 ± 1.02 | 74.17 ± 1.08 | 75.17 ± 1.05 | −2.79% |
| 8 (GB 10 mg/kg) | 82.50 ± 0.67 | 71.00 ± 0.58*** | 65.83 ± 0.95*** | 63.67 ± 0.42*** | −22.82% |
TSAE, aqueous extract of T. serrulatus, TSEO: essential oil of T. serrulatus, GB, Glibenclamide. Each value is presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (M ± SEM), n = 6, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, *, **, *** statistical significance as compared to the negative control group, “+” percent increase in blood glucose level, “−” percent decrease in blood glucose level.
FIGURE 3Effects of the aqueous extract and essential oil on OGTT in normoglycemic mice: change in BGL (mg/dl) at different time intervals.
Effects of aqueous extract and essential oil of T. serrulatus on FBG level (mg/dl) in STZ induced diabetic mice.
| Treatment groups | Fasting blood glucose level (mg/dl) | % Change in BGL (day 0–21) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | ||
| 1 (normal control) | 97.33 ± 1.15 | 107.83 ± 1.33 | 101.67 ± 1.96 | 91.17 ± 0.95 | −6.33% |
| 2 (diabetic control) | 271.67 ± 2.73 | 281.00 ± 5.01 | 268.17 ± 5.28 | 270.69 ± 6.42 | −0.36% |
| 3 (TSAE 150 mg/kg) | 292.83 ± 2.20 | 291.17 ± 5.13 | 274.50 ± 4.46 | 249.83 ± 5.08* | −14.68% |
| 4 (TSAE 300 mg/kg) | 284.33 ± 2.09 | 261.50 ± 4.87 | 251.83 ± 5.70 | 228.83 ± 6.82*** | −19.52% |
| 5 (TSAE 600 mg/kg) | 294.17 ± 2.40 | 253.00 ± 5.46** | 251.83 ± 4.99*** | 164.33 ± 4.68*** | −44.14% |
| 6 (TSEO 150 mg/kg) | 281.67 ± 3.13 | 278.00 ± 6.59 | 263.83 ± 6.45 | 254.00 ± 4.82 | −9.82% |
| 7 (TSEO 300 mg/kg) | 289.00 ± 2.33 | 274.83 ± 4.30 | 237.67 ± 12.75* | 226.17 ± 5.01*** | −21.74% |
| 8 (TSEO 600 mg/kg) | 256.83 ± 3.36 | 243.00 ± 5.98*** | 194.67 ± 4.19*** | 177.67 ± 4.33*** | −30.82% |
| 9 (GB 10 mg/kg) | 288.00 ± 5.08 | 180.33 ± 4.67*** | 140.83 ± 6.90*** | 112.83 ± 5.42*** | −60.82% |
TSAE, aqueous extract of T. serrulatus, TSEO: essential oil of T. serrulatus, GB, glibenclamide. Each value is presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (M ± SEM), n = 6, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 *, **, *** statistical significance as compared to the negative control group given 2% tween 80 10 mg/kg, “−” percent decrease in blood glucose level.
Effects of aqueous extract and essential oil of T. serrulatus on body weight in STZ induced diabetic mice.
| Treatment group | Body weight of mice (g) | % Change in body weight | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | ||
| 1 (Normal control) | 27.20 ± 1.14 | 26.73 ± 0.90 | 27.47 ± 0.91 | 28.55 ± 1.10 | +4.96% |
| 2 (Diabetic control) | 24.78 ± 0.81 | 23.52 ± 0.43 | 21.80 ± 0.80 | 19.83 ± 0.42 | −19.97% |
| 3 (TSAE 150 mg/kg) | 24.82 ± 0.83 | 23.85 ± 2.07 | 22.50 ± 0.68 | 21.08 ± 0.70 | −15.05% |
| 4 (TSAE 300 mg/kg) | 26.75 ± 1.84 | 25.22 ± 1.54 | 24.15 ± 1.89 | 24.13 ± 0.87 | −9.78% |
| 5 (TSAE 600 mg/kg) | 24.70 ± 0.61 | 24.27 ± 0.35 | 23.78 ± 0.49 | 24.22 ± 1.10 | −1.96% |
| 6 (TSEO 150 mg/kg) | 26.12 ± 1.57 | 24.77 ± 1.92 | 24.17 ± 1.06 | 21.30 ± 0.38 | −18.44% |
| 7 (TSEO 300 mg/kg) | 24.55 ± 1.57 | 22.55 ± 1.25 | 22.20 ± 0.58 | 22.75 ± 0.64 | −7.33% |
| 8 (TSEO 600 mg/kg) | 23.90 ± 0.38 | 22.42 ± 0.54 | 22.92 ± 0.83 | 23.27 ± 0.66 | −2.65% |
| 9 (GB 10 mg/kg) | 25.35 ± 1.68 | 24.45 ± 0.63 | 24.27 ± 0.39 | 25.03 ± 1.50 | −1.25% |
TSAE, aqueous extract of T. serrulatus, TSEO, essential oil of T. serrulatus, GB, Glibenclamide. Each value is presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (M ± SEM), n = 6, “+” percent increase in body weight of mice, “−” percent decrease in body weight of mice.