Literature DB >> 33994219

Predation landscapes influence migratory prey ecology and evolution.

Megan C Sabal1, Mark S Boyce2, Corie L Charpentier3, Nathan B Furey4, Thomas M Luhring5, Hans W Martin6, Michael C Melnychuk7, Robert B Srygley8, C Michael Wagner9, Aaron J Wirsing10, Ronald C Ydenberg11, Eric P Palkovacs12.   

Abstract

Migratory prey experience spatially variable predation across their life cycle. They face unique challenges in navigating this predation landscape, which affects their perception of risk, antipredator responses, and resulting mortality. Variable and unfamiliar predator cues during migration can limit accurate perception of risk and migrants often rely on social information and learning to compensate. The energetic demands of migration constrain antipredator responses, often through context-dependent patterns. While migration can increase mortality, migrants employ diverse strategies to balance risks and rewards, including life history and antipredator responses. Humans interact frequently with migratory prey across space and alter both mortality risk and antipredator responses, which can scale up to affect migratory populations and should be considered in conservation and management.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anthropogenic change; antipredator behavior; migration; predation risk

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33994219     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  4 in total

1.  Sea Lamprey Alarm Cue Comprises Water- and Chloroform- Soluble Components.

Authors:  Emily L Mensch; Amila A Dissanayake; Muraleedharan G Nair; C Michael Wagner
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.793

2.  Attenuation and recovery of an avoidance response to a chemical antipredator cue in an invasive fish: implications for use as a repellent in conservation.

Authors:  C Michael Wagner; Jason D Bals; Mikaela E Hanson; Anne M Scott
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Is hunting nonintentionally selective? A test using game bird capture-dead recoveries.

Authors:  Emilienne Grzegorczyk; Léa Bézier; Kévin Le-Rest; Alain Caizergues; Charlotte Francesiaz; Jocelyn Champagnon; Matthieu Guillemain; Cyril Eraud
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Shade affects magnitude and tactics of juvenile Chinook salmon antipredator behavior in the migration corridor.

Authors:  Megan C Sabal; Michelle L Workman; Joseph E Merz; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.