Literature DB >> 33994068

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on BD-IPMNS progression to malignancy.

A Balduzzi1, G Marchegiani2, T Pollini1, M Biancotto1, A Caravati1, E Stigliani1, A Burelli1, C Bassi1, R Salvia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of presumed branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) of the pancreas are referred to a surveillance program due to the relatively low risk of malignancy. We aim to evaluate all available data from observational studies focused on the risks of BD-IPMN progression and malignancy to provide vital insights into its management in clinical practice.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted at PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase for observational studies published before January 1st, 2020. The progression of BD-IPMN was defined as the development of worrisome features (WFs) or high-risk stigmata (HRS) during surveillance. Overall malignancy was defined as all malignancies, such as malignant IPMN, concomitant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and other malignancies, including BD-IPMN with high-grade sec. Baltimore consensus 2015 or BD-IPMN with high-grade dysplasia (carcinoma in situ) sec. WHO 2010. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the presence of a mural nodule as a possible predictor of malignancy.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included, with a total of 8941 patients with a presumed BD-IPMN. The progression rate was 20.2%, and 11.8% underwent surgery, 29.5% of whom showed malignancy at the final pathology. Of those, 78% had malignant IPMNs, and 22% had concomitant pancreatic cancer. Overall, 0.5% had distant metastasis. The meta-analysis showed that the risk of malignancy in the presence of a mural nodule >5 mm had a RR of 5.457 (95% CI 1.404-21.353), while a nonenhancing mural nodule or an enhancing mural nodule < 5 mm had a RR of 5.286 (95% CI 1.805-15.481) of harboring malignancy.
CONCLUSION: Most presumed BD-IPMNs entering surveillance do not become malignant. Of those submitted to surgery, concomitant PDAC adds to the overall risk of detecting malignancy.
Copyright © 2021 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Branch duct-IPMN; IPMN; Malignancy; Pancreatic cysts; Pancreatic surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33994068     DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreatology        ISSN: 1424-3903            Impact factor:   3.996


  4 in total

Review 1.  Humoral Predictors of Malignancy in IPMN: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Enrico C Nista; Tommaso Schepis; Marcello Candelli; Lucia Giuli; Giulia Pignataro; Francesco Franceschi; Antonio Gasbarrini; Veronica Ojetti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  State-of-the-art surgical treatment of IPMNs.

Authors:  Roberto Salvia; Anna Burelli; Giampaolo Perri; Giovanni Marchegiani
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Risk stratification tools for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Alberto Balduzzi; Roberto Salvia; Matthias Löhr
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas: a distinct entity among pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Gaetano Paolino; Irene Esposito; Seung-Mo Hong; Olca Basturk; Paola Mattiolo; Takuma Kaneko; Nicola Veronese; Aldo Scarpa; Volkan Adsay; Claudio Luchini
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 7.778

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.