Kathryn L Lovero1, Cale Basaraba1, Saida Khan1, Antonio Suleman1, Dirceu Mabunda1, Paulino Feliciano1, Palmira Dos Santos1, Wilza Fumo1, Flavio Mandlate1, M Claire Greene1, Andre Fiks Salem1, Jennifer J Mootz1, Ana Olga Mocumbi1, Cristiane S Duarte1, Lidia Gouveia1, Maria A Oquendo1, Melanie M Wall1, Milton L Wainberg1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Lovero, Basaraba, Greene, Fiks Salem, Mootz, Duarte, Wall, Wainberg); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Basaraba, Wall); Health Directorate of Maputo City, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique (Khan, Mabunda); Universidade Eduardo Mondlane School of Medicine, Maputo, Mozambique (Khan, Mabunda, dos Santos, Fumo, Mandlate, Mocumbi, Gouveia); Health Directorate of Nampula Province, Ministry of Health, Nampula, Mozambique (Suleman, Feliciano); Nampula Psychiatric Hospital, Nampula, Mozambique (Suleman, Feliciano); Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique (dos Santos, Fumo, Mandlate, Gouveia); National Institutes of Health, Marracuene, Mozambique (Mocumbi); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Oquendo).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Stepped mental health care requires a rapid method for nonspecialists to detect illness. This study aimed to develop and validate a brief instrument, the Mental Wellness Tool (mwTool), for identification and classification. METHODS: Cross-sectional development and validation samples included adults at six health facilities in Mozambique. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview diagnoses were the criterion standard. Candidate items were from nine mental disorder and functioning assessments. Regression modeling and expert consultation determined best items for identifying any mental disorder and classifying positives into disorder categories (severe mental disorder, common mental disorder, substance use disorder, and suicide risk). For validation, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for any mental disorder (index and proxy respondents) and disorder categories (index). RESULTS: From the development sample (911 participants, mean±SD age=32.0±11 years, 63% female), 13 items were selected-three with 0.83 sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.79-0.86) for any mental disorder and 10 additional items classifying participants with a specificity that ranged from 0.72 (severe mental disorder) to 0.90 (suicide risk). For validation (453 participants, age 31±11 years, 65% female), sensitivity for any mental disorder was 0.94 (95% CI=0.89-0.97) with index responses and 0.73 (95% CI=0.58-0.85) with family proxy responses. Specificity for categories ranged from 0.47 (severe mental disorder) to 0.93 (suicide risk). Removing one item increased severe mental disorder specificity to 0.63 (95% CI=0.58-0.68). CONCLUSIONS: The mwTool performed well for identification of any mental disorder with index and proxy responses to three items and for classification into treatment categories with index responses to nine additional items.
OBJECTIVE: Stepped mental health care requires a rapid method for nonspecialists to detect illness. This study aimed to develop and validate a brief instrument, the Mental Wellness Tool (mwTool), for identification and classification. METHODS: Cross-sectional development and validation samples included adults at six health facilities in Mozambique. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview diagnoses were the criterion standard. Candidate items were from nine mental disorder and functioning assessments. Regression modeling and expert consultation determined best items for identifying any mental disorder and classifying positives into disorder categories (severe mental disorder, common mental disorder, substance use disorder, and suicide risk). For validation, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for any mental disorder (index and proxy respondents) and disorder categories (index). RESULTS: From the development sample (911 participants, mean±SD age=32.0±11 years, 63% female), 13 items were selected-three with 0.83 sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.79-0.86) for any mental disorder and 10 additional items classifying participants with a specificity that ranged from 0.72 (severe mental disorder) to 0.90 (suicide risk). For validation (453 participants, age 31±11 years, 65% female), sensitivity for any mental disorder was 0.94 (95% CI=0.89-0.97) with index responses and 0.73 (95% CI=0.58-0.85) with family proxy responses. Specificity for categories ranged from 0.47 (severe mental disorder) to 0.93 (suicide risk). Removing one item increased severe mental disorder specificity to 0.63 (95% CI=0.58-0.68). CONCLUSIONS: The mwTool performed well for identification of any mental disorder with index and proxy responses to three items and for classification into treatment categories with index responses to nine additional items.
Authors: Harvey A Whiteford; Louisa Degenhardt; Jürgen Rehm; Amanda J Baxter; Alize J Ferrari; Holly E Erskine; Fiona J Charlson; Rosana E Norman; Abraham D Flaxman; Nicole Johns; Roy Burstein; Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kelly Posner; Gregory K Brown; Barbara Stanley; David A Brent; Kseniya V Yershova; Maria A Oquendo; Glenn W Currier; Glenn A Melvin; Laurence Greenhill; Sa Shen; J John Mann Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Benjamin Gierk; Sebastian Kohlmann; Kurt Kroenke; Lena Spangenberg; Markus Zenger; Elmar Brähler; Bernd Löwe Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Herbert Y Kressel; Nader Rifai; Robert M Golub; Douglas G Altman; Lotty Hooft; Daniël A Korevaar; Jérémie F Cohen Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Brandon A Kohrt; Laura Asher; Anvita Bhardwaj; Mina Fazel; Mark J D Jordans; Byamah B Mutamba; Abhijit Nadkarni; Gloria A Pedersen; Daisy R Singla; Vikram Patel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stephanie K Y Choi; Eleanor Boyle; Ann N Burchell; Sandra Gardner; Evan Collins; Paul Grootendorst; Sean B Rourke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Milton L Wainberg; Kathryn L Lovero; Cristiane S Duarte; Andre Fiks Salem; Milena Mello; Charl Bezuidenhout; Jennifer Mootz; Paulino Feliciano; Antonio Suleman; Palmira Fortunato Dos Santos; Myrna M Weissman; Francine Cournos; Andrea Horvath Marques; Wilza Fumo; Dirceu Mabunda; Jean-Marie E Alves-Bradford; Marcelo Mello; Jair J Mari; Phuti Ngwepe; Zuleyha Cidav; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Andrew Medina-Marino; Melanie Wall; Lidia Gouveia; Maria A Oquendo Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Kathryn L Lovero; Salma Ebrahim Adam; Carolina Ezequias Bila; Elda D Canda; Maria Eduarda Fernandes; Teresa I Baltazar Rodrigues; Mariel C Tai Sander; Claude A Mellins; Cristiane S Duarte; Palmira Fortunato Dos Santos; Milton L Wainberg Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 4.144