Mirmilad Khoshknab1, Ling Kuo1,2,3, Tarek Zghaib1, Jeffrey Arkles1, Pasquale Santangeli1, Francis E Marchlinski1, Yuchi Han1, Benoit Desjardins4, Saman Nazarian1. 1. Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a life-threatening complication. We sought to measure the association of esophageal temperature attenuation with radiofrequency (RF) electrode impedance, contact force, and distance from the esophagus. METHODS: The retrospective study cohort included 35 patients with mean age 64 ± 10 years, of whom 74.3% were male, and 40% had persistent AF. All patients had undergone preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) followed by AF ablation with luminal esophageal temperature monitoring. Lesion locations were co-registered with CMR image segmentations of left atrial and esophageal anatomy. Luminal esophageal temperature, time matched RF lesion data, and ablation distance from the nearest esophageal location were collected as panel data. RESULTS: Luminal esophageal temperature changes corresponding to 3667 distinct lesions, delivered with mean power 27.9 ± 5.5 W over a mean duration of 22.2 ± 10.5 s were analyzed. In multivariable analyses, clustered per patient, examining posterior wall lesions only, and adjusted for lesion power and duration as set by the operator, lesion distance from the esophagus (-0.003°C/mm, p < .001), and baseline impedance (-0.015°C/Ω, p < .001) were associated with changes in luminal esophageal temperature. CONCLUSION: Esophageal luminal temperature rises are associated with shorter lesion distance from esophagus and lower baseline impedance during RF lesion delivery. When procedural strategy requires RF delivery near the esophagus, selection of sites with higher baseline impedance may improve safety.
INTRODUCTION: Esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a life-threatening complication. We sought to measure the association of esophageal temperature attenuation with radiofrequency (RF) electrode impedance, contact force, and distance from the esophagus. METHODS: The retrospective study cohort included 35 patients with mean age 64 ± 10 years, of whom 74.3% were male, and 40% had persistent AF. All patients had undergone preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) followed by AF ablation with luminal esophageal temperature monitoring. Lesion locations were co-registered with CMR image segmentations of left atrial and esophageal anatomy. Luminal esophageal temperature, time matched RF lesion data, and ablation distance from the nearest esophageal location were collected as panel data. RESULTS: Luminal esophageal temperature changes corresponding to 3667 distinct lesions, delivered with mean power 27.9 ± 5.5 W over a mean duration of 22.2 ± 10.5 s were analyzed. In multivariable analyses, clustered per patient, examining posterior wall lesions only, and adjusted for lesion power and duration as set by the operator, lesion distance from the esophagus (-0.003°C/mm, p < .001), and baseline impedance (-0.015°C/Ω, p < .001) were associated with changes in luminal esophageal temperature. CONCLUSION: Esophageal luminal temperature rises are associated with shorter lesion distance from esophagus and lower baseline impedance during RF lesion delivery. When procedural strategy requires RF delivery near the esophagus, selection of sites with higher baseline impedance may improve safety.
Authors: Jennifer E Cummings; Robert A Schweikert; Walid I Saliba; J David Burkhardt; Johannes Brachmann; Jens Gunther; Volker Schibgilla; Atul Verma; MarkAlain Dery; John L Drago; Fethi Kilicaslan; Andrea Natale Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-07-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Chirag R Barbhaiya; Saurabh Kumar; Yu Guo; Judy Zhong; Roy M John; Usha B Tedrow; Bruce A Koplan; Laurence M Epstein; William G Stevenson; Gregory F Michaud Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2015-12-23
Authors: Nicolas Doll; Michael A Borger; Alexander Fabricius; Susann Stephan; Jan Gummert; Friedrich W Mohr; Johann Hauss; Hans Kottkamp; Gerd Hindricks Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Carlo Pappone; Hakan Oral; Vincenzo Santinelli; Gabriele Vicedomini; Christopher C Lang; Francesco Manguso; Lucia Torracca; Stefano Benussi; Ottavio Alfieri; Robert Hong; William Lau; Kirk Hirata; Neil Shikuma; Burr Hall; Fred Morady Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-05-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Shiro Nakahara; Rafael J Ramirez; Eric Buch; Yoav Michowitz; Marmar Vaseghi; Carlos de Diego; Noel G Boyle; Aman Mahajan; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-09-17 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Moloy Das; Jonathan J Loveday; Gareth J Wynn; Sean Gomes; Yawer Saeed; Laura J Bonnett; Johan E P Waktare; Derick M Todd; Mark C S Hall; Richard L Snowdon; Simon Modi; Dhiraj Gupta Journal: Europace Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 5.214